Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Info on Merckx EX frames

Started by Mike Lackey · · Last activity · 7 posts · 757 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
27 June 2004
Last activity
28 June 2004
Original author
Mike Lackey
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
757
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Have been trying to dig up information on a Merckx EX (ti)
    frame. A google search does not reveal very much. Any
    information, even if it seems trivial, will be appreciated.

    Mike Lackey Madison, AL

  2. Quoted message said:

    "Mike Lackey" [email hidden] Writes:

    Quoted message said:

    Have been trying to dig up information on a Merckx EX (ti)
    frame. A google search does not reveal very much. Any
    information, even if it seems trivial, will be appreciated.

    Both the Merckx EX and Merckx AX Titanium frames were
    actually manufactured by Litespeed for Merckx. As such, the
    frames were never carried a Litespeed warranty. In the US,
    these frames did carry a warranty for the original owner
    from Gita.

    The EX has a tapered seattube, a bi-ovalized down tube,
    oversized ovalized chainstays and I believe an ovalized top
    tube at the headtube. The AX frame does not have any
    ovalized tubes but does have tapered seat and downtubes.
    The AX chainstays are round with a Serotta like bend in
    them for additional heel clearance. BTW I own a Merckx AX.
    It seems stiff enough for climbing but I've had handling
    problems on high speed descents. Hopefully, the Merckx EX
    will be stiffer?

  3. Re Litespeed Merckx warranty. My #1 bike is a '96 Merckx
    AX, now with 22k miles on it. Three years ago the right
    chainstay fractured around the weld just in front of the
    dropout. LBS sent it to Litespeed for warranty repair.
    They did a beautiful job, by the way, and even applied all
    new decals.

    Re descent handling. There are some reports of high-speed
    shimmy with the Merckx AX, especially in larger frame sizes
    (mine is 58 cm) but I've never encountered it. I descend
    frequently in the 40-45 mph range and have passed 50 mph a
    few times. However, the steering is light and quick, so you
    really have to pay attention and avoid a death grip on the
    bar. (This said, it's not as comfy a descender as my
    Bianchi, which tracks and carves like perfect skis on
    perfect snow.)

    I think the more expensive EX has the same geometry as the
    AX but is stiffer (different alloy + some tubes) mainly for
    sprinters.

    Mike Yankee

    (Address is munged to thwart spammers. To reply, delete
    everything after "com".)

  4. Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (MikeYankee) Writes:

    Quoted message said:

    Re Litespeed Merckx warranty. My #1 bike is a '96 Merckx
    AX, now with 22k miles on it. Three years ago the right
    chainstay fractured around the weld just in front of the
    dropout. LBS sent it to Litespeed for warranty repair.
    They did a beautiful job, by the way, and even applied all
    new decals.

    Re descent handling. There are some reports of high-speed
    shimmy with the Merckx AX, especially in larger frame
    sizes (mine is 58 cm) but I've never encountered it. I
    descend frequently in the 40-45 mph range and have passed
    50 mph a few times. However, the steering is light and
    quick, so you really have to pay attention and avoid a
    death grip on the bar.

    Mike, my Merckx AX is about the same vintage as your AX. I
    have a 59 cm frame and I'm the original owner. However,
    when I contacted Litespeed about my high speed shimmy
    concerns, they told me that they didn't warranty the frame
    but Gita did. Gita gave me a run around you would not
    believe and I finally decided I would just keep my descents
    below 46 or so mph.

    So my frame is actually has a Litespeed warranty?

  5. Quoted message said:

    From: [email hidden] (VCopelan)

    Quoted message said:


    Mike, my Merckx AX is about the same vintage as your AX. I
    have a 59 cm frame and I'm the original owner.

    Does either of these frames have a "Belgium Handmade"
    sticker? (Blue arch with stars, writing below, located on
    the downtube just down from the headtube.) --TP

  6. "Mike Lackey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<gfIDc.190821$Ly.69939@attbi_s01>...

    Quoted message said:

    Have been trying to dig up information on a Merckx EX (ti)
    frame. A google search does not reveal very much. Any
    information, even if it seems trivial, will be
    appreciated.

    Mike Lackey Madison, AL

    Not sure what you're looking for, but here is a bit of what
    I know. Built by Litespeed to Merckx specs, like geometry,
    Italian bb threading, horizontal drop outs, bz-on front mech
    tab, 1" headtube, etc. I think they have been discontinued
    for '04. Also think there were two frame models built for
    Merckx by litespeed, the AX and the EX. Pretty sure AX was
    cheaper, straight guage tubes; EX was nicer, more expensive
    with double butted pipes. They have been around for years.
    Motorola used to ride Caloi/Merckx/Litespeeds back in the
    early to mid. nineties. --Jim

  7. Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (Meccanico di Bici) Writes:

    Quoted message said:

    Not sure what you're looking for, but here is a bit of what
    I know. Built by Litespeed to Merckx specs, like geometry,
    Italian bb threading, horizontal drop outs, bz-on front
    mech tab, 1" headtube, etc. I think they have been
    discontinued for '04. Also think there were two frame
    models built for Merckx by litespeed, the AX and the EX.
    Pretty sure AX was cheaper, straight guage tubes; EX was
    nicer, more expensive with double butted pipes. They have
    been around for years. Motorola used to ride
    Caloi/Merckx/Litespeeds back in the early to mid. nineties.

    Yes, the AX was slightly cheaper and did have some straight
    gauge tubes. However, both the downtube and the seattube
    were tapered on the AX. Those tubes are 1.250" diameter at
    the toptube or headtube. They are 1.375 at the bottom
    bracket. The EX had a number of shaped tubes and oversized
    chainstays but I'm not sure any of the tubes were butted
    either. And none of the AX or EX frames I've seen was setup
    for a braze-on style front derailleur. They all took a clamp-
    on derailleur.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.