UK and Europe · Public discussion

Impotence!

Started by Paul Smith · · Last activity · 71 posts · 4,403 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
15 June 2003
Last activity
17 June 2003
Original author
Paul Smith
Posts
71
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,403
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 71
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Disgruntled Goat said:
    you know? said:
    Paul Smith said:

    This is your final warning. You are no longer in my kill file. If you libel me again, I will
    instruct lawyers to take action against you.

    ROFLMAO! I'm sure we can arrange a suitable sized angry mob to pelt you with eggs at the hearing
    and howl with derision when the case is thrown out!

    Count me in. Should be a giggle watching it laughed out of court. Jeez, what a tosspot.

    Hey, that's *my* special description of PS, leave "tosspot" out of it!

    Actually, "[censored]"'s more to the point.

    Trev

  2. "Paul Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Thomas' tom at greysheep dot co dot uk said:
    Quoted message said:

    You lose. My final warning stands.

    Quoted message said:

    Eh? If you have such a good case, why should you warn "just one more


    time"?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Why not just go ahead and get on with it?

    Why would I want to sue anyone?

    I'd just like him to stop with the libel, and I fully expect my final warning will be sufficient.

    It still seems rather odd that you cannot understand at all why the disabled should have
    parking spaces.

    Perhaps that lack of understanding is in its self a symptom of a disability. In which case, we
    should leave you usenet space to spout your lack of comprehension without taking the [censored].

    uk.transport. FAQ painted with orange lines.

  3. James Annan said:

    Paul Smith wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    This is your final warning. You are no longer in my kill file. If you libel me again, I will
    instruct lawyers to take action against you.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Care to try your luck?

    Quoted message said:

    ROFL! You [censored]!

    Scoff all you like. If John B is foolish enough to libel me again I shall sue him. Then let's see
    who's laughing.
    --
    Paul Smith Scotland, UK safespeed.org.uksafespeed.org.uk please remove "XYZ" to reply by email speed
    cameras cost lives

  4. Trevor Barton said:
    Quoted message said:

    This is your final warning. You are no longer in my kill file. If you libel me again, I will
    instruct lawyers to take action against you.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Care to try your luck?

    Quoted message said:

    Hey, I'll libel you ... you're a [censored]!

    Don't be silly.
    --
    Paul Smith Scotland, UK safespeed.org.uksafespeed.org.uk please remove "XYZ" to reply by email speed
    cameras cost lives

  5. John B said:

    Says something for its impotence I suppose.

    Is that "the impotence of being enest", or just a lost consonant?

    I'll get me troll... 🙂

    --
    Jim Price

    jimprice.dsl.pipex.comjimprice.dsl.pipex.com

    Conscientious objection is hard work in an economic war.

  6. "Trevor Barton" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Hey, I'll libel you ... you're a [censored]!

    Isn't it a little hard (if you will excuse the use of the word that singularly fails to describe the
    medical condition) to be both impotent and a [censored]?

    T

  7. Paul Smith <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    James Annan said:

    Paul Smith wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    This is your final warning. You are no longer in my kill file. If you libel me again, I will
    instruct lawyers to take action against you.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Care to try your luck?

    Quoted message said:

    ROFL! You [censored]!

    Scoff all you like. If John B is foolish enough to libel me again I shall sue him.

    Can you explain what you believe the libel to be, so that I can commit it too?

    Quoted message said:

    Then let's see who's laughing.

    All of us, I believe.

    James

  8. James Annan said:
    Paul Smith said:

    This is your final warning. You are no longer in my kill file. If you libel me again, I will
    instruct lawyers to take action against you.

    Care to try your luck?

    ROFL! You [censored]!

    James

    Nicely summed up.

    John B

  9. Trevor Barton said:
    Paul Smith said:
    John B said:

    Richard wrote:

    This is your final warning. You are no longer in my kill file. If you libel me again, I will
    instruct lawyers to take action against you.

    Care to try your luck?

    Hey, I'll libel you ... you're a [censored]!

    One of the standard defences in libel is to prove that the libel is in fact a truth.

    ;-)

    John B

  10. Paul Smith said:
    John B said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> Can anybody actually provide any evidence of this happening to them, or is this story just
    >> another attempt by the media to banish cycling to the outer reaches of normality.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >Err... This new thread is another attempt at a P**l Sm*th troll. He's just been truly routed
    >by his tosspot mates on his anti-disabled persons viewpoints so now he's back here.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    That's libel. It's not a "troll". I haven't been "routed" and I don't have any "anti-disabled
    persons" viewpoints.

    Quoted message said:

    So you deny, amongst other opinions, that you posted:

    Quoted message said:

    "Personally I don't see why disabled folk should get special treatment."

    I wrote that. It is true. "I don't see why" does not state or imply an "anti disabled persons
    viewpoint". In fact I think everyone should be treated equally.

    Let's remind you of another post you made regarding the disabled: "If they get one privileged, then
    another, then another, pretty soon I'll be a second class citizen brought down to their level. Is
    that right? I don't think so."

    So much for equality.

    John B

  11. Just zis Guy said:

    On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 19:30:21 +0100, Mohammed Saeed Al-Smith <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [quote from Mohammed Saeed Al-Smith]

    "Personally I don't see why disabled folk should get special treatment."

    Quoted message said:

    I wrote that. It is true. "I don't see why" does not state or imply an "anti disabled persons
    viewpoint". In fact I think everyone should be treated equally.

    Except that by definition giving them "equal" treatment when they have unequal access amounts to
    discrimination.

    Quite.

    He also posted: "If they get one privileged, then another, then another, pretty soon I'll be a
    second class citizen brought down to their level. Is that right? I don't think so."

    That doesn't sound much like equal treatment at all.

    John B

  12. James Annan said:

    Paul Smith <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    James Annan said:

    Paul Smith wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    > This is your final warning. You are no longer in my kill file. If you libel me again, I will
    > instruct lawyers to take action against you.

    Quoted message said:

    > Care to try your luck?

    Quoted message said:

    ROFL! You [censored]!

    Scoff all you like. If John B is foolish enough to libel me again I shall sue him.

    Can you explain what you believe the libel to be, so that I can commit it too?

    I'm waiting too.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Then let's see who's laughing.

    All of us, I believe.

    I am.

    John B

  13. Trevor Barton said:
    Disgruntled Goat said:
    you know? said:

    On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:47:14 +0100, Paul Smith <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >This is your final warning. You are no longer in my kill file. If you libel me again, I will
    >instruct lawyers to take action against you.

    ROFLMAO! I'm sure we can arrange a suitable sized angry mob to pelt you with eggs at the hearing
    and howl with derision when the case is thrown out!

    Count me in. Should be a giggle watching it laughed out of court. Jeez, what a tosspot.

    Hey, that's *my* special description of PS, leave "tosspot" out of it!

    Pardon me. :-) It's so utterly suitable, though.

    Quoted message said:

    Actually, "[censored]"'s more to the point.

    Or ignorant scumbag. Or dangerous speed-crazed lunatic petrol-head.

    Hey Smiffy, giss a clue what I gotta do to be sued by you as well! C'mon, I haven't got time to go
    through every insult.

    --
    DG

    Bah!

  14. Paul Smith said:
    James Annan said:

    Paul Smith wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    This is your final warning. You are no longer in my kill file. If you libel me again, I will
    instruct lawyers to take action against you.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Care to try your luck?

    Quoted message said:

    ROFL! You [censored]!

    Nah. [censored] have at least some use. All this turd is useful for is either compost or as a mobile
    organ-bank.

    Quoted message said:

    Scoff all you like. If John B is foolish enough to libel me again I shall sue him. Then let's see
    who's laughing.

    The judge all the way out of court and your brief all the way to the bank, most likely.

    --
    DG

    Bah!

  15. In "]news:[email hidden], Tony W <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:


    Isn't it a little hard (if you will excuse the use of the word that singularly fails to describe
    the medical condition) to be both impotent and a [censored]?

    One can but try ;-)

    Tony

    --
    raven-family.comraven-family.com

    "All truth goes through three steps: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed.
    Finally, it is accepted as self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer

  16. "Richard" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Can anybody actually provide any evidence of this happening to them, or is this story just another
    attempt by the media to banish cycling to the outer reaches of normality. I have personally been
    cycling for around 10 years during which time I have fathered 2 children and had no problems in
    the lower regions. I suspect that the exercise actually improves circulation and increases blood
    flow to that area. I do however stand to be corrected.

    I have seen a study cited that runners generally have a higher sperm count than those who don't
    exercise. I would imagine cycling would give some similar benefits.

    On the article generally, it seems that this story appears every few years. I wouldn't
    worry about it.

    Toby

    --
    Remove spamtrap to reply by mail

  17. John B said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "Personally I don't see why disabled folk should get special treatment."

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I wrote that. It is true. "I don't see why" does not state or imply an "anti disabled persons
    viewpoint". In fact I think everyone should be treated equally.

    Quoted message said:

    Let's remind you of another post you made regarding the disabled: "If they get one privileged, then
    another, then another, pretty soon I'll be a second class citizen brought down to their level. Is
    that right? I don't think so."

    Quoted message said:

    So much for equality.

    Are you having trouble with comprehension?

    I'm discussing a matter of principle by logical extension. No more, no less.
    --
    Paul Smith Scotland, UK safespeed.org.uksafespeed.org.uk please remove "XYZ" to reply by email speed
    cameras cost lives

  18. Mohammed Saeed Al-Smith "wrote":

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > This is your final warning. You are no longer in my kill file. If you libel me again, I will
    > instruct lawyers to take action against you. Care to try your luck?

    James Annan, of disc brake fame, replied:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ROFL! You [censored]!

    And Deputy Under-Acolyte of the Church of the Mobile Death Greenhouse Smith replied:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Scoff all you like. If John B is foolish enough to libel me again I shall sue him. Then let's
    see who's laughing.

    To which James replied:

    Quoted message said:

    All of us, I believe.

    And to which I add, in the truest emulation of an AOL user, amen to that!

    --
    Guy
    ===
    I wonder if you wouldn't mind piecing out our imperfections with your thoughts; and while you're
    about it perhaps you could think when we talk of bicycles, that you see them printing their proud
    wheels i' the receiving earth; thanks awfully.

  19. "John B" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    [quote from Mohammed Saeed Al-Smith]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "Personally I don't see why disabled folk should get special treatment."

    Quoted message said:

    I wrote that. It is true. "I don't see why" does not state or imply an "anti disabled persons
    viewpoint". In fact I think everyone should be treated equally.

    Sez I:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Except that by definition giving them "equal" treatment when they have unequal access amounts to
    discrimination.

    Sez John B:

    Quoted message said:

    He also posted: "If they get one privileged, then another, then another, pretty soon I'll be a
    second class citizen brought down to their level. Is that right? I don't think so." That doesn't
    sound much like equal treatment at all.

    It sounds a lot like plain old-fashioned bigotry to me. Not that I'm likely to visit uk.tosspot to
    find out the complete context, because life is too short to visit that place more than once.

    --
    Guy
    ===
    I wonder if you wouldn't mind piecing out our imperfections with your thoughts; and while you're
    about it perhaps you could think when we talk of bicycles, that you see them printing their proud
    wheels i' the receiving earth; thanks awfully.

  20. "Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mohammed Saeed Al-Smith said:

    According to the BBC, cycling (or is that saddles?) may damage your

    Quoted message said:


    As you would see if you were a genuine contributor rather than a troll there are already two
    active threads quoting this story.

    Hey, he hasn't threatened you with libel. I thought he was after equal treatment for all? Then why's
    he giving Paul B special treatment. The rest of us want to be threatened with court action as well.

    Quoted message said:

    In other news, car drivers continue to kill people in large numbers, speeding motorists continue
    to try to shift the problem onto their victims, drivers stuck in traffic while commuting short
    distances across towns continue to blame other drivers, buses, commercial vehicles, the Government
    and the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy for their plight, and the chances of an intelligent thread
    involving Paul Smith remain at zero.

    And before you make any comment regarding having touched a raw nerve, be aware that I ride a
    recumbent.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com Advance
    notice: ADSL service in process of transfer to a new ISP. Obviously there will be a week of
    downtime between the engineer removing the BT service and the same engineer connecting the same
    equipment on the same line in the same exchange and billing it to the new ISP.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.