"psycholist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:Daniel,
I see lots of folks who take up cycling for weight loss
and never lose weight. Frankly, it's not exactly the best
choice for weight loss because it's a non-weight-bearing
activity and most folks who have real jobs can't do enough
of it, or won't work hard enough at it, to get much
benefit.
I agree that most people can't devote racer-like hours to
training, and that many people do not possess the intensity
to burn lots of calories cycling. However, weight-bearing
has little effect, I think. The reason people don't lose
weight when they cycle is because they are consuming more
calories than they burn. Didn't we have a 100+ thread about
this very subject not long ago?
Quoted message said:What I've read and what I believe based on years of
observing various riders, reading tons of stuff, etc. is
that you absolutely will not lose weight if you don't ride
with some intensity ... at least a couple of
times
Quoted message said:a week. There was a long time when the popular theory was
that, if you spent all your time training in a certain,
relatively easy, heart rate
zone,
Quoted message said:you were using fat as your fuel source instead of sugar.
Therefore,
staying
Quoted message said:in that range all the time would make you lose fat. Great
theory, but I never EVER saw that work for anyone.
Because they ate too much. It's easy to do---Powerbars,
Gatorade, pre-ride pasta gorge, post-ride beers and pizza.
If they ate at maintenance level calories and rode like you
say, they will lose weight.
Quoted message said:If you want to lose weight on the bike, you have to work
HARD on the bike. Lots of mile, lots of intervals of
intensity, etc.
Long slow distance seems to be the rule. Of course, some Poliquin-
type interval training helps, too. But calories are the key.
As bodybuilders say, "great abs are made in the kitchen".
Quoted message said:I don't have a "real" job. I'm self-employed and have a
farm. I have a flexible schedule and can ride alot. I get
in 250 to 300 miles per week pretty much all year round. I
don't race, but I do centuries with the
racer
Quoted message said:folks and turn in sub-5 hour rides regularly. That's
intensity for this
48
Quoted message said:year old body. I say all that to say this ... even with
all those miles
and
Quoted message said:near-race intensity, if I don't eat right, I gain weight.
Carbs like
pasta
Quoted message said:can be great fuel before a big ride, but most of the time,
if you want to lose, you've gotta discipline your diet. I
recommend you look at the Zone diet and learn its
principles. It's not really one of the fad diets. I'm not
a dietician, but the Zone principles seem to make sense
... balancing your fat, protein and carbohydrate intake to
keep your blood sugar at optimum levels. It's really
worked for me.
Good for you. But tricks aside, you cannot escape The Law of
Thermodynamics. If anyone consumes fewer calories than
burned, weight loss will occur. The key is burning fat and
not excessive amounts of muscle.
Quoted message said:One last thing. Crosstraining. Bicycling is great, but I
find it really helps to add a second activity when I want
to lose weight. For me, it's just walking. As I said, I
live on a farm and I simply walk the property each
morning. It takes about 20 minutes and gets the motor
going. For
some
Quoted message said:reason, the addition of a second activity like this really
pushes things into higher gear for me and I lose weight
quickly.
Weight lifting would be ideal. Growing muscle helps to burn
fat. Everybody should strength train, if for no other reason
than to maintain bone density. I don't want to end up a stick-
armed old man with great cardio ability. I want to end up a
strong old man with great cardio ability! :-)