Hi cant find the post i placed on here a couple of days ago so not sure it went on. i am trekking machu picchu next september for autism and have never done anything like this before. would appreciate any advice, assistance or hints from people? I am a little worried about the altitude and need to know the best way of practising for this in england.
-- Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
Hi cant find the post i placed on here a couple of days ago so not sure it went on. i am trekking machu picchu next september for autism and have never done anything like this before. would appreciate any advice, assistance or hints from people? I am a little worried about the altitude and need to know the best way of practising for this in england.
Collette your post did appear. Basically you can't specifically "practice" for altitude in this country. The only training you can do is by going to places that are at altitude. Most probably you will only be able to do this on your actual trip. Don't worry, almost all trips like yours have peopple who are not acclimatissed to altitude. The trick is to gain altitude slowly to let your body get used to teh altitude changes. The porganisers of your trip should have it organised so that your approach walk is nice and slow and that each day you slowly gain altitude over your provious day. This is the way that everyone on treks becomes acclimatised to altitude.
You can help yourself before you go by doing as much walking (with a light pack) as you can to build up your general fitness. When you're doing your training walks you should be looking at building up your stamina by walking relatively longer distances rather than bulding up your speed by dashing over short distances. Whatever distance you start with take it easy at first and build up.
Its fine skitting a regular but its lame to do that to someone who's genuinely confused /looking for help.
Who is skitting (whatever that means)? I posted what I did in a genuine attempt to help the poster. What more could I have done? -- Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
In message <[email hidden]>, SteveO@?.?.invalid writes
Quoted message said:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:34:37 +0100, Andrew <spamtrap@localhost.>
Quoted message said:
Col said:
Hi cant find the post i placed on here a couple of days ago so not sure it went on.
This thread?
Its fine skitting a regular but its lame to do that to someone who's genuinely confused /looking for help.
I think you misunderstood, Steve. The 'this thread' referred to the Google reference Andrew gave following your quotation. [I think he's one of those chaps who think Google own usenet].
I think you misunderstood, Steve. The 'this thread' referred to the Google reference Andrew gave following your quotation. [I think he's one of those chaps who think Google own usenet].
No, I am one of those chaps who like to help people and think that Google provide the only comprehensive archive of Usenet following their buyout of Dejanews. As you are so clever, perhaps you could educate me otherwise? -- Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
I think you misunderstood, Steve. The 'this thread' referred to the Google reference Andrew gave following your quotation. [I think he's one of those chaps who think Google own usenet].
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:02:19 +0100, Andrew <spamtrap@localhost.>
Quoted message said:
No, I am one of those chaps who like to help people and think that Google provide the only comprehensive archive of Usenet following their buyout of Dejanews. As you are so clever, perhaps you could educate me otherwise?
Sorry Andrew, my mistake. Your post read as a "Look Here [dimwit]" by its brevity. I was obviously mistaken, thou art verily of great goodness at heart and a purveyor of fine truths.
In message <[email hidden]>, Andrew <spamtrap@localhost.?.invalid> writes
Quoted message said:
Michael Farthing said:
I think you misunderstood, Steve. The 'this thread' referred to the Google reference Andrew gave following your quotation. [I think he's one of those chaps who think Google own usenet].
No, I am one of those chaps who like to help people and think that Google provide the only comprehensive archive of Usenet following their buyout of Dejanews. As you are so clever, perhaps you could educate me otherwise?
OK wrist slapped. Shouldn't have put in that last sentence. [BTW The first sentence was supposed to be supporting you!]
Yup, what reads fine to one person, can offend another.
At work there's quite a few who CAPITALISE any words or sentences they think is important. The ammount of times I've sworn to kill the mug who wrote an email to me only to find them an oldish little harmless woman....
Thanks very much to you all for the advice, much appreciated. Happy walking! col x "Michael Farthing" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In message <[email hidden]>, Andrew <spamtrap@localhost.?.invalid> writes
Quoted message said:
Michael Farthing said:
I think you misunderstood, Steve. The 'this thread' referred to the Google reference Andrew gave following your quotation. [I think he's one of those chaps who think Google own usenet].
No, I am one of those chaps who like to help people and think that Google provide the only comprehensive archive of Usenet following their buyout of Dejanews. As you are so clever, perhaps you could educate me otherwise?
OK wrist slapped. Shouldn't have put in that last sentence. [BTW The first sentence was supposed to be supporting you!]