X-No-Archive: yes
Donovan Rebbechi <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:MWL said:X-No-Archive: yes
Why the X-No-Archive ? Too bad, I'm quoting you (and taking care not to snip),
so you're on the record now.
Cuz I'm a troll, mate. My words dont need to be preserved for
posterity.
Quoted message said:If you don't think your post is good enough that you're prepared to go on the
record with it (even under a pseudonym), then why should anyone take you
seriously ?
Back when I was trolling in mfw, I had some problems. So I now take
care to use a pseudo and the noarchive.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Surely you jest, mate. Had one too many tallie or you becoming a
Taswegian?
One, how do you know he has impressive credentials?
He could be making it all up, but why would he bother ?
You could be a spokesman for the Bush administration.
You did not answer the question. To repeat: "How do *you* know?"
Quoted message said:It's seldom of
direct relevance. What is of more immediate relevance to topical discussion
here is that he has a better understanding of the research in exercise science
than any other regular poster in this forum. He's already demonstrated a
command of topical subject matter that is consistent with what you'd expect
of someone with graduate level education.
Agreed.
But, when a person is apt to lie in other situations to his
convenience, anything he says in others settings becomes suspect. You
just never know when
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:Two, even if he did, I would take anything he says with a barrel of
salt since he does not shy away from stateing utter lies. Like this
I'd take him seriously, because he consistently posts informative content on
the topic of this newsgroup.
You strike me as the type of guy who wouldn't take Jim Ryun seriously either,
because he's a Republican congressman,. Never mind that he's also a 4 minute
miler.
AHA!!! Now we wade into politics like a saltie. Who in the world said
anything about his politics. (We now know that he is a right wing
Republican hiding behind a Libertarien mask and who's first ever post
(pansy)bashing Bush was provoked by a troll, but then I digress.) I
dint go into politics. So let's us stick to the facts here.
Based on this line he said:Quoted message said:I think one of the UN resolutions stated that if Saddam broke the
resolutions, the UN could return. The US was actually doing what the
UN refused to do since the French, Germans and Russians were getting
sweet deals with Iraq.
I said he lied. What does this have to do with politics. Absolutely
nothing. Any, I mean ANY, news source, will show that this is a lie.
CNN, nbc, abc, bbc, fox, any....
So, mate, here's my question to you: Did he lie?
Now there are many ways to answer this:
1- Completely ignore this post since it's coming from a troll. Folks
will understand that but you and I will know that you have acted like
a chook.
2- Give a simple yes/no answer. which would be the most appropriate
thing to do and it would enhance your reputation as an intelligent
logical and analytical thinker who can answer questions based on fact,
from the mind, without regard for prior reputations, and not from the
heart or political bias.
3- Fudge like Sam/Bush like to do. But this would put a *severe* dent
in your hard earned reputation as hardnosed, no-nonsense, non-PC, PC
weanie disdaining, tough guy.
4- You can avoid creating bad blood between you and Sam or other fans
of Sam by choosing to reply to me in email. But again, this would be a
dent in your reputation.
Let the world see what kind of an Angel you are, mate.
MWL
--------
Quoted message said:The rest of your post is included, unabridged, for the archives.
Quoted message said:one:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl2094236599d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=rcwTc.216%243O3.98%40newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net
where he says:
I think one of the UN resolutions stated that if Saddam broke the
resolutions, the UN could return. The US was actually doing what the
UN
refused to do since the French, Germans and Russians were getting
sweet
deals with Iraq.
C'mon does he not know that the UN was ALREADY there when the US went
in?? And that they only left the week before the US started bombing?
It is obvious that he gets his information from right wing sources
like that drug addict Limbagh. Shameless liars. Both of them.
And you want to tell people to believe some liar that has impressive
credentials?? Are you turning into a Pommie, mate? Or just afraid of
the Yankees?
MWL
------------
Quoted message said:he usually prefers not to boast about them, he might be willing to speak up for a
good cause.
Cheers,
