"Mark Leuck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Resound" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
Just this once...
The problem here is that actually you DON'T listen to (read) what's going
on. I've read very few, if any of your posts that actually relate to the
main topic of discussion. You tend to latch on to some minor point as a
vehicle for "the Great" Ed Dolan to pontificate and then wind up
surprised
at the lack of gratitude displayed by we ignorant trogs for your supposed
wisdom.
No offense but it's you that doesn't "read" what's going on, Ed is a
lonely
old guy who in my opinion has never owned a recumbent and I doubt ever
seen
one in real life. Oh sure he claims he has 12 laying around the house but
in
reality thats the sofa, dresser, table, bookcase, chair etc, he can't post
items that relate to the newsgroup because HE DOESN'T KNOW THE SUBJECT.
I appreciate the proper punctuation Mark. My God, you even put a period at
the end of your last sentence. I don't believe you have ever done that
before.
Why Mark persists in thinking I am lonely is a mystery to me. I am alone a
lot, but I am never lonely. People with well stocked minds are never lonely.
It is also a mistake to think that hermits are lonely. Nothing could be
further from the truth.
I will post on the subject of recumbent bicycles if and when I ever come
across anything that peaks my interest. So far there has not been anything
said on the subject that has interested me, including all of Mark Leuck's
few posts on the subject. Does it seem reasonable that anyone who has every
copy ever published of RCN and read every issue two or three times does not
know anything about recumbents? I go for quality, not quantity. What you
mostly find on ARBR is nothing but rubbish and trash posts. If you want to
know anything worth knowing about recumbents, subscribe to RCN. Bob Bryant
is the editor and he knows what the hell he is talking about 100% of the
time.
Quoted message said:Ed likes conversation, he likes to stir conversation up when it doesn't
exist, sometimes he'll insult someone or say something provocative just to
get a rise from others, it doesn't matter what the subject is as long as
it
sparks a reaction...ANY reaction.
Anyone here on Usenet who does NOT like conversation. If so, then I suggest
the [censored] tube (TV) where you can be bored to your heart's content.
My insult and invective is always in response. I never start that kind of
rubbish. The problem is that others are not used to intellectual type
discussions. They take offense when none is intended. I can't be responsible
for what is going on in their small minds when they are reading my great
mind.
If others are polite with me, then I am polite back. If others are rude with
me, then I am rude back, only I will escalate the rudeness since I never
initiated it. How else are rude blokes ever going to learn anything.
--
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota