"MagillaGorilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:>>What does winning Sea Otter or Redlands get you? $6,500 maybe?
>>
>OK, I'll play along. What do you think it should be?
>
Generally speaking, in the hierarchy of sports from top level down to
amateur, give a equivalent of where you think US domestic professional
bicycle racing is in other sports.
What if we rolled the clock back to the rules/pro team structures we had
20
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:years ago? It really didn't make a difference whether the race or the
teams
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:were pro or amateur. There weren't enough pro riders to fill out a
field, so
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:most races were Pro 1/2. Has the liberal increase in issuing pro riders'
licenses and pro team licenses made a big difference? Even now, the
USPRO
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:road championships is open for foreign riders and teams.
On a different issue (not trying to entrap you, I promise), how do you
see
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:the quality of American domestic professional bicycle racing compared to
domestic professional bicycle racing in other countries? Domestic
professional bicycle racing meaning the field is comprised of at least
80%
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:teams based in that country.
I think the winner of a US pro/NRC race needs to get AT LEAST $10,000
especially when you consider he's got to split that with like 6 other
guys. That's a significant dilution factor that almost no other sport
has to contend with.
That's fine. Where's it going to come from? An alternative is that you
end up with just a handful of NRC races and all the other races just go on
anyway with their existing prizelists. As for the dilution, motorsports has
a significant factor as well.
The difference between the prize lists of events like Wimbledon and the
Masters is that those athletes _don't_ get a salary from a team and have to
pay their expenses out of their own pocket. Caddies get a split too, btw
(just not an equal one).
Quoted message said:
Making comparisons to 20 years ago is neither here nor there. Once
Lance leaves the sport, you likely won't have a U.S. company like
Discovery kicking in $15 million/year for a D1 team with medicore riders.
Sorry, but it is relevant.The depth of pro fields in the US 20 years ago
wasn't sufficient to hold credible, interesting races. I don't know exactly
how many licensed pros there were back then (excluding the one day
independents who paid for licenses so they could start CoreStates), but lets
say it's increased tenfold. Twenty years later, has the number of quality
pro riders increased tenfold as well, or has it just easier to get on a pro
team? Why should mediocre riders be on the start line for races with $10k to
win? Maybe that's why there aren't many $10k-to-win domestic races.
Quoted message said:
I think the US pro domestic scene has been slowly improving overall, but
the RATE of improvement pales in comparison to baseball, football, and
basketball. You can throw NASCAR in there even though it's not a sport
and their drivers by no means athletes (except in their own mind)
Generally speaking, in the hierarchy of sports from top level down to
amateur, give a equivalent of where you think US domestic professional
bicycle racing is in other sports.
Why would you expect a big improvement when it is a niche, not mainstream,
sport? Why is it we want the prestige and big money of a mainstream sport,
but want to maintain the snobbery of a niche sport?
Quoted message said:
The problem with US cycling is complex. I think the quality of the US
domestic scene is probably comparable to any European country.
Now I know you're not serious.
The
Quoted message said:bigest difference with the NRC is you have to get on a plane every
weekend. In Europe, it's less expensive to have a team compete in a
particular country/region.
Then with 1/3 less events to worry about this year, you should be one happy
ape. However, what do team expenses have to do with prizelists?