Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Front derailleur selection

Started by hhu · · Last activity · 10 posts · 598 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
16 February 2005
Last activity
17 February 2005
Original author
hhu
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
598
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My new triple crankset has a 53 tooth big ring and a 30 tooth small
    ring. I've been looking for front derailleurs that can handle the 23
    teeth range and so far the biggest capacity I can find is 22 teeth. I
    haven't seen any designed for 53 tooth big rings- 52 teeth seems to be
    the limit...

    Can anyone recommend a 53-30, triple capable front derailleur?
    Or will the 22 tooth capable units work OK?

    Thanks!

  2. hhu said:

    My new triple crankset has a 53 tooth big ring and a 30 tooth small
    ring. I've been looking for front derailleurs that can handle the 23
    teeth range and so far the biggest capacity I can find is 22 teeth.

    Those capacity ratings are quite conservative. Any derailleur capable of
    shifting a triple should do, since most triples have an even larger jump
    between the big ring and granny.

    Quoted message said:

    haven't seen any designed for 53 tooth big rings- 52 teeth seems to be
    the limit...

    Again, not a big deal.

    Quoted message said:


    Can anyone recommend a 53-30, triple capable front derailleur? Or will
    the 22 tooth capable units work OK?

    In my experience, they should work fine.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | What is objectionable, and what is dangerous about extremists is
    _`\(,_ | not that they are extreme, but that they are intolerant.
    (_)/ (_) | --Robert F. Kennedy

  3. Quoted message said:

    My new triple crankset has a 53 tooth big ring and a 30 tooth small
    ring. I've been looking for front derailleurs that can handle the 23
    teeth range and so far the biggest capacity I can find is 22 teeth. I
    haven't seen any designed for 53 tooth big rings- 52 teeth seems to be
    the limit...

    Can anyone recommend a 53-30, triple capable front derailleur?
    Or will the 22 tooth capable units work OK?

    The biggest issue won't be the total capacity range (fudging one or two
    teeth past the published max should be no big deal) but rather how well it's
    designed for the largest/middle combo. For example, a derailleur made for a
    53/42/30 will have a differently-designed cage than one made for 53/39/30.
    In general, the larger the gap between the two larger chainrings, the more
    difficult shifting will be.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  4. hhu said:

    My new triple crankset has a 53 tooth big ring and a 30 tooth small
    ring. I've been looking for front derailleurs that can handle the 23
    teeth range and so far the biggest capacity I can find is 22 teeth. I
    haven't seen any designed for 53 tooth big rings- 52 teeth seems to be
    the limit...

    Can anyone recommend a 53-30, triple capable front derailleur?
    Or will the 22 tooth capable units work OK?...

    A standard Shimano front road derailleur will even work with 62-52-39
    rings, though there is not much room for error (<1 mm) in setting its
    vertical position.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Earth

  5. hhu uuhh said:

    Can anyone recommend a 53-30, triple capable front derailleur?
    Or will the 22 tooth capable units work OK?

    The 22t derailleurs work fine.

  6. hhu uuhh said:

    My new triple crankset has a 53 tooth big ring and a 30 tooth small
    ring. I've been looking for front derailleurs that can handle the 23
    teeth range and so far the biggest capacity I can find is 22 teeth. I
    haven't seen any designed for 53 tooth big rings- 52 teeth seems to be
    the limit...

    Can anyone recommend a 53-30, triple capable front derailleur?
    Or will the 22 tooth capable units work OK?

    Thanks!

    Hi, Shimano Dura-Ace Triple is designed to work with the DA 30-39-53
    crankset. I have one and it works just fine.

    Life is Good!
    Jeff

  7. Jeff Starr said:
    hhu uuhh said:

    My new triple crankset has a 53 tooth big ring and a 30 tooth small
    ring. I've been looking for front derailleurs that can handle the 23
    teeth range and so far the biggest capacity I can find is 22 teeth.
    I haven't seen any designed for 53 tooth big rings- 52 teeth seems
    to be the limit...

    Can anyone recommend a 53-30, triple capable front derailleur?
    Or will the 22 tooth capable units work OK?

    Thanks!

    Hi, Shimano Dura-Ace Triple is designed to work with the DA 30-39-53
    crankset. I have one and it works just fine.

    FWIW, I replaced my Ultegra crankset (30-42-52) with a DA (30-39-53), and my
    Ultegra FD still works fine. (In fact, I shouldn't have touched it
    probably, as it then took a bit of "experimenting" to get it right again.)

    Bill "half & half (DA and Ultegra, that is)" S.

  8. I have the 53-39-30 combo.

    Can you suggest any specific derailleurs for that sort of combo?

    Thanks!

  9. I'm all set, thanks for the replies!

  10. Quoted message said:

    I have the 53-39-30 combo.

    Can you suggest any specific derailleurs for that sort of combo?

    Thanks!

    Either the new Ultegra-10 triple or DuraAce Triple-9 should do well, as
    they're both made with a 39t middle in mind. Don't use the older Ultegra-9
    triple front though, as it was designed for a 52/42/30.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    IMBA, BikesBelong, NBDA member

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.