Traveller ® said:On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:19:55 +0000 (UTC), Donovan Rebbechi
snip...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:If you don't want to run with a GPS or race with a HRM, then don't. Just
because someone else does, doesn't make them any less of a runner.
I've run with both a GPS and a heart rate monitor at various times. But I
don't devote a great deal of time and effort to "analyzing" my run(s), and I
really don't understand what purpose it would serve.
So why use them at all?
Here's one example of how I've used a GPS -- there's a route my training group
runs in the trails. I can go for a run with the group, use the GPS to map the
route, so I can run that route on my own in future. Or use the GPS as a
navigation tool. Or even use it to get an approximate measure of milage (though
this isn't even all that good for this, because a guesstimate is usually pretty
accurate)
Heart rate monitors ? I use heart rate based training on tempo runs,
especially during winter when I don't have measured courses to work with.
Usually, I'd do the run on a track and monitor pace carefully, but if there's
no good measure of distance available, I monitor heart rate. One can do
similar with interval training. Generally, I'd prefer to do speed work on a
track but it's not practical in winter when the tracks are all snowed out. I
also used the HRM on easier runs during injury rehab, to prevent myself from
pushing too hard in training. Likewise, one can also use them during tapering
for similar reasons -- to avoid pushing too hard during a training period that
requires a backoff.
But the idea that a typical training run requires "analysis" is ridiculous.
Just get the miles/time in, at a conversational pace, that's about all there
is to iit. If want to do analysis for its own sake, out of scientific curiosity
or something, knock yourself out with it, but it's not going to help your
running.
Cheers,
--
Donovan Rebbechi
http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/