I ran into this link today and decided to put it here for anyone who may
happen to use an I-Pod. Many of us don't need music 24/7 but for those
who do this is relevant.
Bill
Road Cycling · Public discussion
For I-Pod users
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 4 April 2006
- Last activity
- 19 April 2006
- Original author
- Bill Baka
- Posts
- 81
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 2,042
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Better yet, get rid of the in-ear phones and get some full cup cans
which are further away from your ear bits. Not totally safe either at
high volume, but better--and nicer sound as well. Cheap Sennheiser
HD202s will blow the stock 'phones away.Don't wear them on your bike.
-
Thanks Bill.
Personally, it's not too relevant. I rarely raise the volume above
25%. If it's noisy enough to require much more than that, it's too
noisy to be listening to music.Jeff
-
landotter said:
Better yet, get rid of the in-ear phones and get some full cup cans
which are further away from your ear bits. Not totally safe either at
high volume, but better--and nicer sound as well. Cheap Sennheiser
HD202s will blow the stock 'phones away.Don't wear them on your bike.
Definitely not on a bike, but I have seen pedestrians wearing them and
not in the least aware of their surroundings. Maybe those are the
targets for a 'Darwin' event. It may not be a direct relation, but I did
hear a story of a woman so involved in a cell phone conversation that
she walked in front of a train.
Be safe.
Bill -
"Bill Baka" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
landotter said:
Better yet, get rid of the in-ear phones and get some full cup cans
which are further away from your ear bits. Not totally safe either at
high volume, but better--and nicer sound as well. Cheap Sennheiser
HD202s will blow the stock 'phones away. Don't wear them on your bike.
Definitely not on a bike, but I have seen pedestrians wearing them and not
in the least aware of their surroundings. Maybe those are the targets for
a 'Darwin' event. It may not be a direct relation, but I did hear a story
of a woman so involved in a cell phone conversation that she walked in
front of a train.
Be safe.
BillLet's not start this again.
-
Gooserider said:
"Bill Baka" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
landotter said:
Better yet, get rid of the in-ear phones and get some full cup cans
which are further away from your ear bits. Not totally safe either at
high volume, but better--and nicer sound as well. Cheap Sennheiser
HD202s will blow the stock 'phones away. Don't wear them on your bike.
Definitely not on a bike, but I have seen pedestrians wearing them and not
in the least aware of their surroundings. Maybe those are the targets for
a 'Darwin' event. It may not be a direct relation, but I did hear a story
of a woman so involved in a cell phone conversation that she walked in
front of a train.
Be safe.
BillLet's not start this again.
Oh the "don't wear headphones because it's againt the law on a bike" vs
the smug "I'm so special I don't need to obey the law" discussion? -
Quoted message said:
Oh the "don't wear headphones because it's againt the law on a bike" vs
the smug "I'm so special I don't need to obey the law" discussion?
Plus, if you play loud music while you ride, you yell "On Your Left" WAY
too loud...--
John Calnan
http://www.calnan-web.com/weblog -
landotter said:
Oh the "don't wear headphones because it's againt the law on a bike" vs
the smug "I'm so special I don't need to obey the law" discussion?Against the law where?
Laters,
Marz
-
Marz said:
landotter said:
Oh the "don't wear headphones because it's againt the law on a bike" vs
the smug "I'm so special I don't need to obey the law" discussion?Against the law where?
Most US states have a law against wearing headphones and operating a
vehicle. Exceptions exist for those stoopit cellie phone getups with
one earphone--in *most* states. -
John Calnan said:
Quoted message said:
Oh the "don't wear headphones because it's againt the law on a bike" vs
the smug "I'm so special I don't need to obey the law" discussion?
Plus, if you play loud music while you ride, you yell "On Your Left" WAY
too loud...Dude, like get a bell. It's uber L337. :-D
Seriously though, I find that people process a "ding ding" a hell of a
lot faster than the more complex "on yer left". -
Most, if not all, Canadian provinces ban the use of headphones while
operating a vehicle.Jeff
-
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Most, if not all, Canadian provinces ban the use of headphones while
operating a vehicle.Jeff
Do you have cite/site? My understanding was that Ontario bans full
headphones that cover the entire ear but allow 'bud' earphones.I searched around the MTO site but couldn't find anything definitive.
-
Gooserider said:
"Bill Baka" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
landotter said:
Better yet, get rid of the in-ear phones and get some full cup cans
which are further away from your ear bits. Not totally safe either at
high volume, but better--and nicer sound as well. Cheap Sennheiser
HD202s will blow the stock 'phones away. Don't wear them on your bike.Definitely not on a bike, but I have seen pedestrians wearing them and not
in the least aware of their surroundings. Maybe those are the targets for
a 'Darwin' event. It may not be a direct relation, but I did hear a story
of a woman so involved in a cell phone conversation that she walked in
front of a train.
Be safe.
BillLet's not start this again.
I didn't post that as a bicycle thing, just that there was an ear issue
with volume. Preserve your ears at home so you can hear when riding.
I don't expect anyone here to be dumb enough to wear phones AND ride.
Bill -
landotter said:
Gooserider wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Let's not start this again.
Quoted message said:
Oh the "don't wear headphones because it's againt the law on a bike"
vs the smug "I'm so special I don't need to obey the law" discussion?He said smugly.
How about the self-righteous "don't wear headphones because it's against the
law on a bike" (horrible sentence structure, BTW) versus the "don't need no
steenkin' ear-nanny bud police tellin' me what to do" retort?Choice is a good thing... BS
-
Bill Baka said:
I didn't post that as a bicycle thing, just that there was an ear issue
with volume. Preserve your ears at home so you can hear when riding.
I don't expect anyone here to be dumb enough to wear phones AND ride.
BillBut you posted it to a bike group so it's relavence to cycling will be
discussed.I drive by sight and I ride by sight while I enjoy listening to music.
I've always felt sorry for you simple folk who can't multi-task.Laters,
Marz
-
landotter said:
Oh the "don't wear headphones because it's againt the law on a bike" vs
the smug "I'm so special I don't need to obey the law" discussion?Where is it against the law? Not here, it ain't.
-
Quoted message said:
Most, if not all, Canadian provinces ban the use of headphones while
operating a vehicle.....which is completely silly when high school kids and other bright
sectors of society can upgrade their car's sound system so that it's
loud enough to set off other cars' alarms and rattle my house's windows
as they drive down the street.
\\paul -
Sorni said:
landotter said:
Gooserider wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Let's not start this again.
Quoted message said:
Oh the "don't wear headphones because it's againt the law on a bike"
vs the smug "I'm so special I don't need to obey the law" discussion?He said smugly.
How about the self-righteous "don't wear headphones because it's against the
law on a bike" (horrible sentence structure, BTW) versus the "don't need no
steenkin' ear-nanny bud police tellin' me what to do" retort?Choice is a good thing... BS
Choice? It's against the law. All of your dry-drunk grandstanding can't
change that.Anyway, shouldn't you be having lunch with Tom Delay, yet another
pompous dry drunk? He's got plenty of time these days.I'm sorry that English is my second language and it offends you so.
/sarcasm
-
Andrew Price said:
landotter said:
Oh the "don't wear headphones because it's againt the law on a bike" vs
the smug "I'm so special I don't need to obey the law" discussion?Where is it against the law? Not here, it ain't.
Really? It's against the law in most states, including NY, VA, PA, TN,
IL and so on.At any rate it's incredibly stupid, and even stupider is claiming that
it's not stupid. -
Marz said:
Bill Baka said:
I didn't post that as a bicycle thing, just that there was an ear issue
with volume. Preserve your ears at home so you can hear when riding.
I don't expect anyone here to be dumb enough to wear phones AND ride.
BillBut you posted it to a bike group so it's relavence to cycling will be
discussed.I drive by sight and I ride by sight while I enjoy listening to music.
I've always felt sorry for you simple folk who can't multi-task.I've always been annoyed by the pod-deaf people that can't hear my bike
bell.It has nothing to do with multitasking, it's akin to saying that it's
just as safe to drive at night with sunglasss on. Completely aburd
reasoning.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.