UK and Europe · Public discussion

Folders ... ?

Started by elyob · · Last activity · 46 posts · 1,578 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
30 August 2006
Last activity
5 September 2006
Original author
elyob
Posts
46
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,578
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–46 of 46
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Tony Raven said:

    John B wrote on 01/09/2006 15:07 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    i agree the BF packs quite large and takes longer to fold and bag (about 4-5
    mins) but it does fit easily into all trains I have travelled on - it is not
    just a car and plane machine.

    You've had more luck than me then. I have taken the BF on two trains.
    One was the Oxenholme to Lancaster train at the end of the Cyclefest
    Folder ride in 2004 (which Bike Friday's CEO joined). There it had to
    be wedged (folded and bagged) onto two seats. Fortunately the train was
    not crowded. Another journey on Virgin I just about managed to squeezed
    it bagged and folded onto the luggage rack in the middle of the carriage
    although it stuck out into the corridor some way.

    I have become very suspicious of SWT recently.
    I take my BF on 3-4 trains a week and have only once had to bag it up this year -
    last Tuesday when they had a strike and said 'no bikes at all'.

    My DF does the same number of journeys and again its as easy as pie. Three years
    ago the guards checked reservations strictly, but no more.
    It is now so easy on SWT that I am highly wary of their motives as I don't think
    many people now book - despite the 'requirement' on certain trains. SWT could
    easily say no one takes a bike because there are no records of reservations :-(
    Of course it may be that they don't want to upset cyclists as the franchise is up
    for grabs.

    Quoted message said:

    The Brompton OTOH goes on the trains into and out of London several
    times a week.

    ditto, but not London.

    Quoted message said:

    However I have ridden centuries on the BF but would not even start to
    contemplate it on the Brommie although I know people do.

    Ditto.

    John B

  2. Erik Sandblom said:

    The titanium Brompton S2LX is 9,5kg while the Birdy Speed is 10,4kg. The
    Brompton only has two speeds though, the Birdy has nine. I think a
    six-speed Brompton, S6LX, would still be lighter but I'm not sure.

    Lighter, possibly, but it depends to what end you're getting light. For
    carting it about, yes, clearly better, but for performance there are
    other factors that would have more effect than a couple of hundred of
    grammes. I think the Birdy will easily outperform the Brom if you're in
    a hurry.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. daren said:

    Birdy: Light, good fold, expensive, I found them rather too twitchy and
    I'm 5' 10".

    To what extent is twitchy handling related to height?

    I'm 5'8". I found the Birdy to ride like a "normal" sporty bike (with
    the standard bars, haven't tried the swept-back "comfort" bars).

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  4. In article said:
    daren said:

    Birdy: Light, good fold, expensive, I found them rather too twitchy and
    I'm 5' 10".

    To what extent is twitchy handling related to height?

    I'm 5'8". I found the Birdy to ride like a "normal" sporty bike (with
    the standard bars, haven't tried the swept-back "comfort" bars).

    I'm 6'3" and found a Birdy much less twitchy than a Brompton with
    extended seatpost. I only had short test rides though.

  5. Peter Clinch said:
    daren said:

    Birdy: Light, good fold, expensive, I found them rather too twitchy and
    I'm 5' 10".

    To what extent is twitchy handling related to height?

    I'm 5'8". I found the Birdy to ride like a "normal" sporty bike (with
    the standard bars, haven't tried the swept-back "comfort" bars).

    Just didn't like the handling with comfort stem. The forward stem might
    put more weight over the front wheel and that may help. This was
    indoors at last year's Cycle show, and the contrast with the Mezzo
    ridden immediately afterwards was enormous. I had to try both twice as
    I was so suprised.

    My Brompton is fairly twitchy too I supose, but I just couldn't take to
    the Birdy at all.

    regards,
    daren
    --
    remove outer garment for reply

  6. Quoting Peter Clinch <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:
    daren said:

    Birdy: Light, good fold, expensive, I found them rather too twitchy and
    I'm 5' 10".


    To what extent is twitchy handling related to height?

    I'm 5' 10"; the Brompton's fine with both hands on the bars, but a little
    edgy when signalling.
    --
    OPTIONS=name:Kirsty,menustyle:C,female,lit_corridor,standout,time,showexp,hilit
    e_pet,catname:Akane,dogname:Ryoga,fruit:okonomiyaki,pickup_types:"!$?=/,scores:
    5 top/2 around,color,boulder:0,autoquiver,autodig,disclose:yiyayvygyc,pickup_bu
    rden:burdened,!cmdassist,msg_window:reversed,!sparkle,horsename:Rumiko,showrace

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.