Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Difficulty in tire changing

Started by Paul Cassel · · Last activity · 76 posts · 3,173 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
15 October 2005
Last activity
2 November 2005
Original author
Paul Cassel
Posts
76
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,173
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 61–76 of 76
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. someone said:
    Antti Salonen said:

    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 27.1 W
    Michelin Pro2 Race 29.2 W
    Michelin Carbon 34.7 W
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 35.4 W
    Hutchinson Fusion 39.6 W
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 40.3 W
    Continental Grand Prix 3000 46.6 W

    Quoted message said:

    Are they claiming you need almost double the energy to push the
    worst tire compared to the best tire? That's kind of hard to
    believe unless these numbers are extremely small compared to other
    forces (like aerodynamics). How do these tire differences translate
    into actual speed differences?

    We could compare these results with the ones often discussed here:

    http://www.terrymorse.com/bike/imgs/rolres.gif

    where such differences become more palpable.

    Jobst Brandt

  2. C said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Antti Salonen said:

    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 27.1 W
    Michelin Pro2 Race 29.2 W
    Michelin Carbon 34.7 W
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 35.4 W
    Hutchinson Fusion 39.6 W
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 40.3 W
    Continental Grand Prix 3000 46.6 W

    Are they claiming you need almost double the energy to push the worst tire
    compared to the best tire?

    Yes they do.

    That's kind of hard to believe unless these

    Quoted message said:

    numbers are extremely small compared to other forces (like aerodynamics).

    I can output about 220 Watts in a lactate steady mode. A 20 Watt
    difference is a LOT. No Grand Prix 3000 for me ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    How do these tire differences translate into actual speed differences?

    It depends.

    Lou

    --
    Posted by news://news.nb.nu

  3. C said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Antti Salonen said:

    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 27.1 W
    Michelin Pro2 Race 29.2 W
    Michelin Carbon 34.7 W
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 35.4 W
    Hutchinson Fusion 39.6 W
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 40.3 W
    Continental Grand Prix 3000 46.6 W

    Are they claiming you need almost double the energy to push the worst tire
    compared to the best tire?

    Yes they do.

    That's kind of hard to believe unless these

    Quoted message said:

    numbers are extremely small compared to other forces (like aerodynamics).

    I can output about 220 Watts in a lactate steady mode. A 20 Watt
    difference is a LOT. No Grand Prix 3000 for me ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    How do these tire differences translate into actual speed differences?

    It depends.

    Lou

    --
    Posted by news://news.nb.nu

  4. C said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Antti Salonen said:

    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 27.1 W
    Michelin Pro2 Race 29.2 W
    Michelin Carbon 34.7 W
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 35.4 W
    Hutchinson Fusion 39.6 W
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 40.3 W
    Continental Grand Prix 3000 46.6 W

    Are they claiming you need almost double the energy to push the worst tire
    compared to the best tire?

    Yes they do.

    That's kind of hard to believe unless these

    Quoted message said:

    numbers are extremely small compared to other forces (like aerodynamics).

    I can output about 220 Watts in a lactate steady mode. A 20 Watt
    difference is a LOT. No Grand Prix 3000 for me ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    How do these tire differences translate into actual speed differences?

    It depends.

    Lou

    --
    Posted by news://news.nb.nu

  5. Thanks for those numbers...

    This is a huge range of Crr... and it has a big effect on speed.

    Crr= Prr/(W*V) = Prr/ (85kg*9.81m*35km/hr*.2778) = Prr*.0001233

    Tire Prr Crr Speed*
    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 27.1 W .00334 23.22
    Michelin Pro2 Race 29.2 W .00360 23.14
    Michelin Carbon 34.7 W .00428 22.94
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 35.4 W .00436 22.91
    Hutchinson Fusion 39.6 W .00488 22.76
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 40.3 W .00497 22.73
    Continental Grand Prix 3000 46.6 W .00575 22.50

    *
    185lb rider + bike
    250W rider output
    CdA = .32m^2 (racing crouch, normal road bike)
    Transmission efficiency = 96%

    So... they tested these in a lab, on a big drum? Continental must be
    very unhappy about this...

  6. Thanks for those numbers...

    This is a huge range of Crr... and it has a big effect on speed.

    Crr= Prr/(W*V) = Prr/ (85kg*9.81m*35km/hr*.2778) = Prr*.0001233

    Tire Prr Crr Speed*
    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 27.1 W .00334 23.22
    Michelin Pro2 Race 29.2 W .00360 23.14
    Michelin Carbon 34.7 W .00428 22.94
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 35.4 W .00436 22.91
    Hutchinson Fusion 39.6 W .00488 22.76
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 40.3 W .00497 22.73
    Continental Grand Prix 3000 46.6 W .00575 22.50

    *
    185lb rider + bike
    250W rider output
    CdA = .32m^2 (racing crouch, normal road bike)
    Transmission efficiency = 96%

    So... they tested these in a lab, on a big drum? Continental must be
    very unhappy about this...

  7. Thanks for those numbers...

    This is a huge range of Crr... and it has a big effect on speed.

    Crr= Prr/(W*V) = Prr/ (85kg*9.81m*35km/hr*.2778) = Prr*.0001233

    Tire Prr Crr Speed*
    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 27.1 W .00334 23.22
    Michelin Pro2 Race 29.2 W .00360 23.14
    Michelin Carbon 34.7 W .00428 22.94
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 35.4 W .00436 22.91
    Hutchinson Fusion 39.6 W .00488 22.76
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 40.3 W .00497 22.73
    Continental Grand Prix 3000 46.6 W .00575 22.50

    *
    185lb rider + bike
    250W rider output
    CdA = .32m^2 (racing crouch, normal road bike)
    Transmission efficiency = 96%

    So... they tested these in a lab, on a big drum? Continental must be
    very unhappy about this...

  8. The numbers I got on rollers for the Cx, & pro race 2 pretty much
    match these. No surprise on the GP3000 either. The ultra-thin
    "race only" Conti Supersonic was one of the slowest tires I tested.

    BTW, the Veloflex master (clincher) was slow too.

    -jens

  9. The numbers I got on rollers for the Cx, & pro race 2 pretty much
    match these. No surprise on the GP3000 either. The ultra-thin
    "race only" Conti Supersonic was one of the slowest tires I tested.

    BTW, the Veloflex master (clincher) was slow too.

    -jens

  10. The numbers I got on rollers for the Cx, & pro race 2 pretty much
    match these. No surprise on the GP3000 either. The ultra-thin
    "race only" Conti Supersonic was one of the slowest tires I tested.

    BTW, the Veloflex master (clincher) was slow too.

    -jens

  11. Ron Ruff said:

    So... they tested these in a lab, on a big drum? Continental must be
    very unhappy about this...

    Yes, the tyres were tested on what looks like a steel drum. The wheel
    and inner tube were the same for all tyres and the pressure always 7.0
    bar. The equipment was actually Continental's so the result probably
    didn't come as a surprise to them.

    Of course their tyres also had strong points like excellent puncture
    resistance and a combination of low weight and good mileage. They just
    aren't very fast. I don't know if it's an exaggeration to say that they
    are not suitable for competition.

    The rolling friction coefficients in your post were a bit off, but here
    are all coefficients from the mag, lowest first. All tyres were
    foldable 23-mm clinchers.

    Deda Tre Giro d'Italia 0.0038
    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 0.0039
    Michelin Pro 2 Race 0.0042
    Vittoria Diamante Pro Rain 0.0044
    Michelin Megamium 2 0.0047
    Pariba Revolution 0.0048
    Michelin Carbon 0.0050
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 0.0051
    Schwalbe Stelvio Plus 0.0052
    Schwalbe Stelvio Evolution Front 0.0056
    Continental GP Force (rear specific) 0.0057
    Hutchinson Fusion 0.0057
    Schwalbe Stelvio Evolution Rear 0.0057
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 0.0058
    Ritchey Pro Race Slick WCS 0.0058
    Schwalbe Stelvio 0.0059
    Specialized S-Works Mondo 0.0061
    Continental GP 3000 0.0067
    Hutchinson Top Speed 0.0069
    Continental GP Attack (front specific) 0.0073

    The test also included a calculation that on a flat 40 km time trial, a
    rider with a 300 W power output would finish 2 minutes and 18 seconds
    faster with the Deda Tre tyres than with Hutchinson Top Speed.

    -as

  12. Ron Ruff said:

    So... they tested these in a lab, on a big drum? Continental must be
    very unhappy about this...

    Yes, the tyres were tested on what looks like a steel drum. The wheel
    and inner tube were the same for all tyres and the pressure always 7.0
    bar. The equipment was actually Continental's so the result probably
    didn't come as a surprise to them.

    Of course their tyres also had strong points like excellent puncture
    resistance and a combination of low weight and good mileage. They just
    aren't very fast. I don't know if it's an exaggeration to say that they
    are not suitable for competition.

    The rolling friction coefficients in your post were a bit off, but here
    are all coefficients from the mag, lowest first. All tyres were
    foldable 23-mm clinchers.

    Deda Tre Giro d'Italia 0.0038
    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 0.0039
    Michelin Pro 2 Race 0.0042
    Vittoria Diamante Pro Rain 0.0044
    Michelin Megamium 2 0.0047
    Pariba Revolution 0.0048
    Michelin Carbon 0.0050
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 0.0051
    Schwalbe Stelvio Plus 0.0052
    Schwalbe Stelvio Evolution Front 0.0056
    Continental GP Force (rear specific) 0.0057
    Hutchinson Fusion 0.0057
    Schwalbe Stelvio Evolution Rear 0.0057
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 0.0058
    Ritchey Pro Race Slick WCS 0.0058
    Schwalbe Stelvio 0.0059
    Specialized S-Works Mondo 0.0061
    Continental GP 3000 0.0067
    Hutchinson Top Speed 0.0069
    Continental GP Attack (front specific) 0.0073

    The test also included a calculation that on a flat 40 km time trial, a
    rider with a 300 W power output would finish 2 minutes and 18 seconds
    faster with the Deda Tre tyres than with Hutchinson Top Speed.

    -as

  13. Antti Salonen said:

    The rolling friction coefficients in your post were a bit off

    Ah! The problem is that I put 35 rather than 30 in the equation. This
    is how it should have read:

    Crr= Prr/(W*V) = Prr/ (85kg*9.81m*30km/hr*.2778) = Prr*.0001233

    But, with the Crr values there is no need to convert. Here is the speed
    and differentials for all of the tires:

    Tire Crr Speed* Delta

    Deda Tre Giro d'Italia 0.0038 23.08
    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 0.0039 23.05 0.03
    Michelin Pro 2 Race 0.0042 22.96 0.12
    Vittoria Diamante Pro Rain 0.0044 22.90 0.18
    Michelin Megamium 2 0.0047 22.81 0.27
    Pariba Revolution 0.0048 22.78 0.30
    Michelin Carbon 0.0050 22.72 0.36
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 0.0051 22.69 0.39
    Schwalbe Stelvio Plus 0.0052 22.66 0.42
    Schwalbe Stelvio Evolution Front 0.0056 22.54 0.54
    Continental GP Force (rear) 0.0057 22.51 0.57
    Hutchinson Fusion 0.0057 22.51 0.57
    Schwalbe Stelvio Evolution Rear 0.0057 22.51 0.57
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 0.0058 22.48 0.60
    Ritchey Pro Race Slick WCS 0.0058 22.48 0.60
    Schwalbe Stelvio 0.0059 22.45 0.63
    Specialized S-Works Mondo 0.0061 22.39 0.69
    Continental GP 3000 0.0067 22.21 0.87
    Hutchinson Top Speed 0.0069 22.15 0.93
    Continental GP Attack (front) 0.0073 22.04 1.04

    *
    in MPH
    185lb rider + bike
    250W rider output
    CdA = .32m^2 (racing crouch, normal road bike)
    Transmission efficiency = 96%

  14. Antti Salonen said:

    The rolling friction coefficients in your post were a bit off

    Ah! The problem is that I put 35 rather than 30 in the equation. This
    is how it should have read:

    Crr= Prr/(W*V) = Prr/ (85kg*9.81m*30km/hr*.2778) = Prr*.0001233

    But, with the Crr values there is no need to convert. Here is the speed
    and differentials for all of the tires:

    Tire Crr Speed* Delta

    Deda Tre Giro d'Italia 0.0038 23.08
    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 0.0039 23.05 0.03
    Michelin Pro 2 Race 0.0042 22.96 0.12
    Vittoria Diamante Pro Rain 0.0044 22.90 0.18
    Michelin Megamium 2 0.0047 22.81 0.27
    Pariba Revolution 0.0048 22.78 0.30
    Michelin Carbon 0.0050 22.72 0.36
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 0.0051 22.69 0.39
    Schwalbe Stelvio Plus 0.0052 22.66 0.42
    Schwalbe Stelvio Evolution Front 0.0056 22.54 0.54
    Continental GP Force (rear) 0.0057 22.51 0.57
    Hutchinson Fusion 0.0057 22.51 0.57
    Schwalbe Stelvio Evolution Rear 0.0057 22.51 0.57
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 0.0058 22.48 0.60
    Ritchey Pro Race Slick WCS 0.0058 22.48 0.60
    Schwalbe Stelvio 0.0059 22.45 0.63
    Specialized S-Works Mondo 0.0061 22.39 0.69
    Continental GP 3000 0.0067 22.21 0.87
    Hutchinson Top Speed 0.0069 22.15 0.93
    Continental GP Attack (front) 0.0073 22.04 1.04

    *
    in MPH
    185lb rider + bike
    250W rider output
    CdA = .32m^2 (racing crouch, normal road bike)
    Transmission efficiency = 96%

  15. Antti Salonen said:

    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 27.1 W
    Michelin Pro2 Race 29.2 W
    Michelin Carbon 34.7 W
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 35.4 W
    Hutchinson Fusion 39.6 W
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 40.3 W
    Continental Grand Prix 3000 46.6 W

    Any Schwalbe tires in the test?

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  16. Antti Salonen said:

    Vittoria Open Corsa Evo CX 27.1 W
    Michelin Pro2 Race 29.2 W
    Michelin Carbon 34.7 W
    Panaracer Stradius Pro 35.4 W
    Hutchinson Fusion 39.6 W
    Continental Ultra GatorSkin 40.3 W
    Continental Grand Prix 3000 46.6 W

    Any Schwalbe tires in the test?

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.