In article <v5eKb.63513$I07.274322@attbi_s53>,
Peter Cole said:
I think it's a problem only in magazines. There are many ex-runners in the group I ride with, most
of them became too injured to continue running and turned to cycling for rehab. Running doesn't
seem to age gracefully.
I started out running about 5 years ago, and took up biking about 3 years ago after a knee injury.
In my limited experience:
Running pros: it is a more effecient exercise. I can get a better workout running than I can biking
simply because biking takes so much longer. I can go running in much worse weather (wet & cold) than
I am willing to ride in. I can run in the snow, but I won't ride in it.
Running cons: I've had more running injuries than any other kind. I've had ankle, knee, hip, and
groin injuries, and it is very frustrating to finally make some progress, then injure myself. I have
to take time off, and when I start back up it is like starting all over.
Riding pros: it is a lot more fun. After a hard ride, I'm tired, but I feel good, instead of sore
and exhausted after running. On a hot day, I would much rather ride than run. No matter what running
injuries I've inflicted on myself, I can still ride without pain.
Riding cons: it is not enough. Controlling my weight has been a constant battle, and riding alone
isn't good enough. I judge my cardio fitness level by measuring my resting heartrate, and riding
doesn't get it down to what running does. Much harder to ride in the winter when it is dark, cold,
and wet. I'm down to riding on the weekends (if I'm lucky).
So I try to do both, although I currently trying to get over yet another running injury...