Ed Swierk said:Quoted message said:You WILL fall to the side on which the crank failed and if its a left crank you will dive under
passing traffic if there is any.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I've done it several times and was lucky to have no traffic.
Quoted message said:Is this alarming anyone else besides me? Shouldn't important parts of bicycles be designed not to
fail catastrophically under normal use (i.e. riding them)?
This is another item that James Annan might pursue, that of pedal attachment, because that is where
most cranks fail. As I have often written, we have left hand threads on left pedals for a reason,
that being that pedals always move in the crank even when tightened securely. Thier motion is
evident by visible fretting wear on the face of the crank from pedal contact. Besides, if
conventionsl cranks are used on tandems using reversed cranks, they loosen in use.
Quoted message said:There's no substitute for regular maintenance and safety checks, natch, but to this newbie, a
crank snapping in two seems to be well beyond normal wear-'n'-tear.
In this case there is. After breaking one crank per year, over many years, I modified my pedal
attachment to have a 90 degree conical seat like lug nuts on automobile wheels. THese nuts formerly
had left hand threads before the conical lug nut was invented. I no longer have crank failures and
no longer make a weekly magnifying glass inspection of my cranks since making this modification. The
cranks have outlived previous ones nearly tenfold to now.
I have shown the cranks, how they were modified, and explained the concept to various crank
manufacturers, including Shimano higher management at InterBike 2002. They dismiss the concept
similarly to the comments we have heard about disc brake wheel separation.
Jobst Brandt [email hidden] Palo Alto CA