Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Cottered Cranks with Fixed Gear

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 14 posts · 1,028 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
10 November 2005
Last activity
13 November 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,028
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have recently come into posession of a 1950's Raleigh Lenton that was
    converted into a fixed gear somewhere around the early 80's. My LBS
    has given it the once over, but advised me to change the original steel
    cottered cranks as soon as possible, on the grounds that they would
    invevitably fly apart at an intersection forthwith, especially on a
    fixed gear bike.

    The cotters seem to be in good condition, and the cranks are currently
    secure. I'm currently using the bike on my daily commute.

    Are the cottered cranks truly a ticking time bomb, or is the LBS being
    unnecessarily cautious here?

    Jeff 8-)

  2. A properly installed cottered crank will be no problem with a fixed
    gear. This was done for years, and there was not a rash of failures.
    I had a similar set up, and it works as you would expect.

  3. Let's see ... this bike has been a fixie for probably 20 years, with
    no problem with the cottered cranks. Cottered cranks are a sturdy and
    durable design. Did you ever take the cranks off of a cottered set-up?
    Without a special tool, it takes alot of hammer force to pound out the
    cotter -- which is held secure with a nut and washer on the narrow end.
    What? Vibration is going to loosen the nut, it will fall off, and
    then without warning the crank will fly off? If by some remote
    possibility the nut did fall off, you would feel slop in the crank way
    before anything bad happened. (Just like you feel slop in a cotterless
    crank that is loosening up.) Then it would be a simple matter of
    replacing and tightening the nut.

    The LBS can make $100 bucks or so if they "upgrade" your bike. I wonder
    what kind of experience your LBS has with cottered fixies? What is
    their experience re. the failure rate of cottered fixies vs. cotterless
    on fixies.

    I'm a little cynical here. I asked my LBS to install a "sealed
    bearing" BB on my fixie -- in part just to support them. A couple of
    months later the BB loosened, IMO because of improper installation --
    not tight enough. They said it was my fault, as my "back pedal for
    stopping" was the cause of the problem -- and charged me for the
    repair. Actually, I have front and rear brakes, and use them for most
    of my slowing down. I now do pretty much all of my own repair work.

    Regards,
    Larry

  4. Let's see ... this bike has been a fixie for probably 20 years, with
    no problem with the cottered cranks. Cottered cranks are a sturdy and
    durable design. Did you ever take the cranks off of a cottered set-up?
    Without a special tool, it takes alot of hammer force to pound out the
    cotter -- which is held secure with a nut and washer on the narrow end.
    What? Vibration is going to loosen the nut, it will fall off, and
    then without warning the crank will fly off? If by some remote
    possibility the nut did fall off, you would feel slop in the crank way
    before anything bad happened. (Just like you feel slop in a cotterless
    crank that is loosening up.) Then it would be a simple matter of
    replacing and tightening the nut.

    The LBS can make $100 bucks or so if they "upgrade" your bike. I wonder
    what kind of experience your LBS has with cottered fixies? What is
    their experience re. the failure rate of cottered fixies vs. cotterless
    on fixies.

    I'm a little cynical here. I asked my LBS to install a "sealed
    bearing" BB on my fixie -- in part just to support them. A couple of
    months later the BB loosened, IMO because of improper installation --
    not tight enough. They said it was my fault, as my "back pedal for
    stopping" was the cause of the problem -- and charged me for the
    repair. Actually, I have front and rear brakes, and use them for most
    of my slowing down. I now do pretty much all of my own repair work.

    Regards,
    Larry

  5. As they say on Car Talk, "Somebody needs to make a boat payment."

    Other than being a bit heavy, cottered cranks are refreshingly durable,
    handsome, and mechanically straight-forward. Keep them--and get some
    slot cleated shoes and wool shorts just to spite those bike shop
    jagoffs. :P

    Only reason to replace would be if the chainring's worn, but
    steel/chrome rings last virtually forever.

  6. Quoted message said:

    I have recently come into posession of a 1950's Raleigh Lenton that was
    converted into a fixed gear somewhere around the early 80's. My LBS
    has given it the once over, but advised me to change the original steel
    cottered cranks as soon as possible, on the grounds that they would
    invevitably fly apart at an intersection forthwith, especially on a
    fixed gear bike.

    The cotters seem to be in good condition, and the cranks are currently
    secure. I'm currently using the bike on my daily commute.

    Are the cottered cranks truly a ticking time bomb, or is the LBS being
    unnecessarily cautious here?

    Not so much unnecessarily cautious. I'd go for either maliciously lying to
    get you to spend money, or dangerously incompetent wrt bikes older than
    the mechanic.

    There's nothing wrong with steel cranks or cottered cranks, as long as you
    don't care about weight, and you don't want to take them apart,
    respectively. Once you do want to take them apart, cottered cranks become
    a bit of a liability, but there's certainly no reason to replace the
    crankset until the BB croaks.

    Jasper

  7. They're not a PITA to take apart either, unless somebody's
    over-tightened the cotters. Soak the area with penetrating lube before
    trying to undo 50 y/o cotters. If you do have to drill them out, you
    can buy new cotter pins.

  8. Quoted message said:

    I have recently come into posession of a 1950's Raleigh Lenton that was
    converted into a fixed gear somewhere around the early 80's. My LBS
    has given it the once over, but advised me to change the original steel
    cottered cranks as soon as possible, on the grounds that they would
    invevitably fly apart at an intersection forthwith, especially on a
    fixed gear bike.

    The cotters seem to be in good condition, and the cranks are currently
    secure. I'm currently using the bike on my daily commute.

    Are the cottered cranks truly a ticking time bomb, or is the LBS being
    unnecessarily cautious here?

    Jeff 8-)

    Since cottered cranks were the gold standard for track sprinting for
    many years after cotterless cranks were standard on road bikes I would
    say that your LBS is full of BS. Reg Harris used cottered cranks and
    they worked fine for him.
    Phil Brown

  9. Quoted message said:

    I have recently come into posession of a 1950's Raleigh Lenton that was
    converted into a fixed gear somewhere around the early 80's. My LBS
    has given it the once over, but advised me to change the original steel
    cottered cranks as soon as possible, on the grounds that they would
    invevitably fly apart at an intersection forthwith, especially on a
    fixed gear bike.

    The cotters seem to be in good condition, and the cranks are currently
    secure. I'm currently using the bike on my daily commute.

    Are the cottered cranks truly a ticking time bomb, or is the LBS being
    unnecessarily cautious here?

    At best, unnecessarily cautious. Any concern that such cranks are
    sudden-failure-prone when there is reverse pressure involved is
    unfounded in my opinion. Although cottered cranks vanished for good
    reasons, it had more to do with weight and ease of assembly and
    servicing than failures. The square taper allows assembly without the
    need for a box of cotters and the attendant filing and fitting, and
    it's easier to make a durable aluminum crank with a square taper than
    with a cotter. There are lots of very old cottered-crank bikes
    running aound whose BB has never been apart for anything but a little
    grease (if that), and a good many are and have been in daily use by
    pedicab and cargo-bike operators who spend a lot of time standing on
    the pedals waiting for a break in traffic. I on't think you have
    anything to worry about with your old setup; I'd just ride it. The
    worst that might happen is that the crank might loosen up, which isn't
    something that goes from wiggle to wobble to whoops in a hurry.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  10. philcycles said:


    Quoted message said:

    I have recently come into posession of a 1950's Raleigh Lenton that was
    converted into a fixed gear somewhere around the early 80's. My LBS
    has given it the once over, but advised me to change the original steel
    cottered cranks as soon as possible, on the grounds that they would
    invevitably fly apart at an intersection forthwith, especially on a
    fixed gear bike.

    The cotters seem to be in good condition, and the cranks are currently
    secure. I'm currently using the bike on my daily commute.

    Are the cottered cranks truly a ticking time bomb, or is the LBS being
    unnecessarily cautious here?

    Jeff 8-)

    Since cottered cranks were the gold standard for track sprinting for
    many years after cotterless cranks were standard on road bikes I would
    say that your LBS is full of BS. Reg Harris used cottered cranks and
    they worked fine for him.
    Phil Brown

    no experience with fixed gear and cottered cranks, but cotters will not
    last if you knock them in from the wrong side. From which can be
    deduced that if your riding style involves large torque reversals you
    could have trouble.
    --
    ---
    Marten Gerritsen

    INFOapestaartjeM-GINEERINGpuntNL
    www.m-gineering.nl

  11. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    maxo said:

    They're not a PITA to take apart either, unless somebody's
    over-tightened the cotters. Soak the area with penetrating lube before
    trying to undo 50 y/o cotters. If you do have to drill them out, you
    can buy new cotter pins.

    I will add here to soak overnight with a penetrating
    lubricant. This is a general rule. Whenever I want to work
    on a years old fastener I add the penetrating oil and
    leave it for 24 hours.

    --
    Michael Press

  12. "maxo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    As they say on Car Talk, "Somebody needs to make a boat payment."

    Other than being a bit heavy, cottered cranks are refreshingly durable,
    handsome, and mechanically straight-forward. Keep them--and get some
    slot cleated shoes and wool shorts just to spite those bike shop
    jagoffs. :P

    Only reason to replace would be if the chainring's worn, but
    steel/chrome rings last virtually forever.

    I have been using cottered Raleigh cranks for years on both my fixed gear
    and coaster brake rain bike. After several thousand miles on each the only
    problem I have is that I wore out the bottom bracket on the rain bike and am
    having a hard time finding a replacement spindle.

    The bike shop you went to is wrong on this topic but that does not make them
    all bad. The local shop here that gives me tremendous service on my cottered
    bikes is not the place I take my Campagnolo 10s for service. I am sure there
    are shops that do both well but I have not found one yet.

    Dave Reckoning
    Noblesville, IN

  13. Werehatrack said:


    At best, unnecessarily cautious. Any concern that such cranks are
    sudden-failure-prone when there is reverse pressure involved is
    unfounded in my opinion.

    Amen. there is no greater example of reverse pressure than a sprinter
    doing a track stand.
    Phil Brown

  14. oh.jeff said:

    I have recently come into posession of a 1950's Raleigh Lenton that was
    converted into a fixed gear somewhere around the early 80's. My LBS
    has given it the once over, but advised me to change the original steel
    cottered cranks as soon as possible, on the grounds that they would
    invevitably fly apart at an intersection forthwith, especially on a
    fixed gear bike.

    Horseshit. How did we ever survive back in the days when millions of
    bikes had cottered cranks.

    Quoted message said:

    Are the cottered cranks truly a ticking time bomb, or is the LBS being
    unnecessarily cautious here?

    Cottered cranks are a PITA to work on, since you have to drive out and
    replace the cotters to pull the crank arm. They don't want to be
    bothered, plus they want to sell you something.

    OTOH, aluminum cranks are a lot lighter. But there is a cool factor to
    the steel cranks.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | You will say Christ saith this and the apostles say this; but
    _`\(,_ | what canst thou say? -- George Fox.
    (_)/ (_) |

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.