UK and Europe · Public discussion

Chainline problems

Started by Coyoteboy · · Last activity · 8 posts · 463 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
15 October 2007
Last activity
16 October 2007
Original author
Coyoteboy
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
463
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I came to swap my old cranks for even older ones (both square taper) but
    found my new older old cranks (lol) lined the rings up closer to the frame.
    Not a big problem but in order to get the right BB to set the new (larger)
    rings out from the frame I'm going to need to shimmy the chainline out
    towards ~6th cog down at the back on an 8speed block. This seems too far and
    is somewhat annoying, especially as I've sacrificed the granny ring for
    weight and to get the crank closer to the chainstays. Any suggestions? I'm
    trying to extend the life of my frame and didnt want to invest in a whole
    new set of cranks as the der-hanger is faulty anyway and the forks are
    threaded - it just does the job for now.

  2. "Coyoteboy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I came to swap my old cranks for even older ones (both square taper) but
    found my new older old cranks (lol) lined the rings up closer to the frame.
    Not a big problem but in order to get the right BB to set the new (larger)
    rings out from the frame I'm going to need to shimmy the chainline out
    towards ~6th cog down at the back on an 8speed block. This seems too far
    and is somewhat annoying, especially as I've sacrificed the granny ring for
    weight and to get the crank closer to the chainstays. Any suggestions? I'm
    trying to extend the life of my frame and didnt want to invest in a whole
    new set of cranks as the der-hanger is faulty anyway and the forks are
    threaded - it just does the job for now.

    If you're using larger rings and they won't clear the chainstay without
    moving them out (by fitting the longer BB), you've got no choice in the
    matter...

    (I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "I'm going to need to shimmy the
    chainline out", since the chainline is purely a function of where the cogs
    are)

    cheers,
    clive

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, Coyoteboy
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I came to swap my old cranks for even older ones (both square taper) but
    found my new older old cranks (lol) lined the rings up closer to the frame.
    Not a big problem but in order to get the right BB to set the new (larger)
    rings out from the frame I'm going to need to shimmy the chainline out
    towards ~6th cog down at the back on an 8speed block. This seems too far and
    is somewhat annoying, especially as I've sacrificed the granny ring for
    weight and to get the crank closer to the chainstays. Any suggestions? I'm
    trying to extend the life of my frame and didnt want to invest in a whole
    new set of cranks as the der-hanger is faulty anyway and the forks are
    threaded - it just does the job for now.


    Are the rear dropouts properly aligned with the bottom bracket? It
    sounds as if your frame may be out of track.

  4. Clive George said:

    "Coyoteboy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I came to swap my old cranks for even older ones (both square taper)
    but found my new older old cranks (lol) lined the rings up closer to
    the frame. Not a big problem but in order to get the right BB to set
    the new (larger) rings out from the frame I'm going to need to shimmy
    the chainline out towards ~6th cog down at the back on an 8speed
    block. This seems too far and is somewhat annoying, especially as I've
    sacrificed the granny ring for weight and to get the crank closer to
    the chainstays. Any suggestions? I'm trying to extend the life of my
    frame and didnt want to invest in a whole new set of cranks as the
    der-hanger is faulty anyway and the forks are threaded - it just does
    the job for now.

    If you're using larger rings and they won't clear the chainstay without
    moving them out (by fitting the longer BB), you've got no choice in the
    matter...

    (I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "I'm going to need to shimmy the
    chainline out", since the chainline is purely a function of where the
    cogs are)

    cheers,
    clive

    Well i meant that i have no choice but to move the rings out so the line
    of the centre ring is way off-centre.

  5. Rob Morley said:

    Are the rear dropouts properly aligned with the bottom bracket? It
    sounds as if your frame may be out of track.

    Not entirely sure, no. The bike does have a habit of requiring some
    right-lean to hold it steady when riding no-handed. I put this down to
    my bottom as i seem to require the same on my other bike too! I'm not
    sure how im going to try to measure its centrality (word?!)

    J

  6. In article said:
    Rob Morley said:

    Are the rear dropouts properly aligned with the bottom bracket? It
    sounds as if your frame may be out of track.

    Not entirely sure, no. The bike does have a habit of requiring some
    right-lean to hold it steady when riding no-handed. I put this down to
    my bottom as i seem to require the same on my other bike too! I'm not
    sure how im going to try to measure its centrality (word?!)

    See http://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-spacing.html and scroll down
    to "Checking Alignment (Symmetry)".

  7. In the referenced article said:
    Rob Morley said:

    Are the rear dropouts properly aligned with the bottom bracket? It
    sounds as if your frame may be out of track.

    Not entirely sure, no. The bike does have a habit of requiring some
    right-lean to hold it steady when riding no-handed. I put this down
    to my bottom as i seem to require the same on my other bike too!

    Doesn't have to be your physiology. A small amount of lean may
    be necessary for counteract the camber of the road[1]. You may
    also be "lopsided" if you've cash, keys etc concentrated in one
    pocket rather than distributed evenly. And, of course, luggage
    distribution on the bike may make you lopsided.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not sure how im going to try to measure its centrality (word?!)

    Sheldon Brown to the rescue. See his string method for checking
    frame alignment:

    http://sheldonbrown.com/frame-spacing.html

    [1] That's why trike riders have forearms like Popeye. They're
    constantly heaving on the handlebars to stop the trike veering
    into the gutter :-)
    --
    Dennis Davis, BUCS, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
    [email hidden]

  8. In article <[email hidden]>, Alan Braggins
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    In article said:
    Rob Morley said:

    Are the rear dropouts properly aligned with the bottom bracket? It
    sounds as if your frame may be out of track.

    Not entirely sure, no. The bike does have a habit of requiring some
    right-lean to hold it steady when riding no-handed. I put this down to
    my bottom as i seem to require the same on my other bike too! I'm not
    sure how im going to try to measure its centrality (word?!)

    See http://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-spacing.html and scroll down
    to "Checking Alignment (Symmetry)".


    Alternatively if you have the bottom bracket out just put a 2 foot
    straight edge along each side of the shell to check the dropout offset.
    That checks just the rear end alignment rather than relying on the head
    tube being in the right place too.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.