UK and Europe · Public discussion

Canti brakes power hanger

Started by Tim Hall · · Last activity · 10 posts · 570 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
19 February 2007
Last activity
20 February 2007
Original author
Tim Hall
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
570
Views / 30 days
8

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've been tinkering with the brakes on my recumbent.

    At present both front and rear are Dia Compe cantis as fitted to it
    when new - about 8 years ago. I've managed to adjust the rear (using
    sheldon's and park tools' websites so it actually does something.

    The front is a bit more difficult. The cable goes to a "power hanger"
    - a right angled widget that sits where the cable yoke would. It's
    attached to the fork crown by a bolt and terminates the brake cable
    outer. The inner cable carries on down to one of the brake arms. A
    short cable joins it to the other brake arm. When the brake lever is
    squeezed, the directly attached lever moves, contacts the rim and
    stops moving. The power hanger then swivels, pulling the other arm
    into play.

    A bit complicated to describe.

    I don't think it's that good and am minded to get rid of it, but
    before I do, has anyone got any tips and wrinkles as to how to adjust
    it?

    Tim

  2. Tim Hall said:

    The front is a bit more difficult. The cable goes to a "power hanger"
    - a right angled widget that sits where the cable yoke would. It's
    attached to the fork crown by a bolt and terminates the brake cable
    outer. The inner cable carries on down to one of the brake arms. A
    short cable joins it to the other brake arm. When the brake lever is
    squeezed, the directly attached lever moves, contacts the rim and
    stops moving. The power hanger then swivels, pulling the other arm
    into play.

    A bit complicated to describe.

    Is it like the one on page 47 of this PDF?

    http://www.marzocchi.com/admin/download.asp?IDFolder=126&LN=UK&Sito=mtb&Campo=ManualeUnico&IDOggetto=2892

    If so, the PDF has some brief instructions, but I don't remember it being
    particularly difficult to adjust (I had one of those forks
    back-in-the-day).

    Anthony

  3. Tim Hall said:

    I've been tinkering with the brakes on my recumbent.

    At present both front and rear are Dia Compe cantis as fitted to it
    when new - about 8 years ago. I've managed to adjust the rear (using
    sheldon's and park tools' websites so it actually does something.

    The front is a bit more difficult. The cable goes to a "power hanger"
    - a right angled widget that sits where the cable yoke would. It's
    attached to the fork crown by a bolt and terminates the brake cable
    outer. The inner cable carries on down to one of the brake arms. A
    short cable joins it to the other brake arm. When the brake lever is
    squeezed, the directly attached lever moves, contacts the rim and
    stops moving. The power hanger then swivels, pulling the other arm
    into play.

    A bit complicated to describe.

    I don't think it's that good and am minded to get rid of it, but
    before I do, has anyone got any tips and wrinkles as to how to adjust
    it?

    Tim

    Ignore the powerhanger when you adjust the brakes. Only thing worth
    noting is that (just as with conventional setup cantilevers) the lenght
    of the cable section is critical. If you have canti's on a post, it is
    most likely that braking will improve by sliding the blocks out as much
    as they will go.

    --
    ---
    Marten Gerritsen

    INFOapestaartjeM-GINEERINGpuntNL
    www.m-gineering.nl

  4. I'm sure the recommendations of the other two posters will solve your
    problems as cantis are basically sound, but if you want to try a better
    system I would suggest you look at Magura HS11s at about 70 quid for front
    and rear. I've now got these on my 'bent, my tandem, and my tourer and for
    me they are the "best"
    Got mine from the CTC shop.

    SW

  5. Steve Watkin said:

    I'm sure the recommendations of the other two posters will solve your
    problems as cantis are basically sound, but if you want to try a better
    system I would suggest you look at Magura HS11s at about 70 quid for front
    and rear. I've now got these on my 'bent, my tandem, and my tourer and for
    me they are the "best"

    I use HS-33s, similar but the next model up. And I must say they're
    just miles ahead of any manual rim brakes I've ever used. More
    powerful, easier to modulate, easier to adjust, so recommendation seconded.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  6. "Peter Clinch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Steve Watkin said:

    I'm sure the recommendations of the other two posters will solve your
    problems as cantis are basically sound, but if you want to try a better
    system I would suggest you look at Magura HS11s at about 70 quid for
    front and rear. I've now got these on my 'bent, my tandem, and my tourer
    and for me they are the "best"

    I use HS-33s, similar but the next model up. And I must say they're just
    miles ahead of any manual rim brakes I've ever used. More powerful,
    easier to modulate, easier to adjust, so recommendation seconded.

    For those who don't know, the essential difference between the HS11 and the
    HS33 is (or certainly used to be) the size of the master cylinder. The HS33
    one has a smaller diameter, so for the same finger movement, less fluid gets
    moved, and hence the brake pads move a bit less. (25% IIRC). The force on
    the pads however goes up by the same amount, ie better brakes. Given that
    the HS11/22/66 had plenty of spare lever movement, changing the
    movement/force compromise like they did for the HS33 is very sensible, and
    as such I'd always get them, given the choice.

    cheers,
    clive

  7. in message <[email hidden]>, Tim Hall

    (') said:

    I've been tinkering with the brakes on my recumbent.

    At present both front and rear are Dia Compe cantis as fitted to it
    when new - about 8 years ago. I've managed to adjust the rear (using
    sheldon's and park tools' websites so it actually does something.

    The front is a bit more difficult. The cable goes to a "power hanger"
    - a right angled widget that sits where the cable yoke would. It's
    attached to the fork crown by a bolt and terminates the brake cable
    outer. The inner cable carries on down to one of the brake arms. A
    short cable joins it to the other brake arm. When the brake lever is
    squeezed, the directly attached lever moves, contacts the rim and
    stops moving. The power hanger then swivels, pulling the other arm
    into play.

    A bit complicated to describe.

    I don't think it's that good and am minded to get rid of it, but
    before I do, has anyone got any tips and wrinkles as to how to adjust
    it?

    Yes. Replace it with a proper straddle wire. The contraption you describe
    (yes, I remember them) is an abortion.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    IMHO, there aren't enough committed Christians, but that's care
    in the community for you. -- Ben Evans

  8. Simon Brooke said:
    Quoted message said:


    I don't think it's that good and am minded to get rid of it, but
    before I do, has anyone got any tips and wrinkles as to how to adjust
    it?

    Yes. Replace it with a proper straddle wire. The contraption you describe
    (yes, I remember them) is an abortion.

    It being a recumbent, these things are probably fitted for a reason
    (lack of space or a bendy steerer causing vibrations)
    If you want to do away with the powerhanger it is probably necessary to
    convert to V-s or HS
    --
    ---
    Marten Gerritsen

    INFOapestaartjeM-GINEERINGpuntNL
    www.m-gineering.nl

  9. Tim Hall said:

    A bit complicated to describe.

    I have one of these on my recumbent - it's there because the normal
    canti arrangement would foul the boom.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think it's that good and am minded to get rid of it, but
    before I do, has anyone got any tips and wrinkles as to how to adjust
    it?

    The only adjustment which makes any difference is the secondary cable
    length, which is adjusted such that the brake pads have the same
    clearance on each side. The position you put the brake pads in will
    have more effect, as that will determine the angle of the canti
    calipers. I would adjust the brake pads so that at the end of the
    cable travel (brake fully applied, new pads) the straddle cable is
    perpendicular to a line from the canti post to the cable attachment at
    the end of the canti caliper. That's not easy to explain either, but
    adjusted like that I get as good a performance as I've ever had out of
    cantis.

    Getting rid of a setup like that can be tricky if there is not enough
    clearance to allow un-fouled cable routing to a canti hanger, and
    enough cable to the straddle to allow full operation of the brakes. V
    brakes might work, but might mess up the feel of the brakes.

    JimP

  10. In article <[email hidden]>, JimP
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Tim Hall said:

    A bit complicated to describe.

    I have one of these on my recumbent - it's there because the normal
    canti arrangement would foul the boom.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think it's that good and am minded to get rid of it, but
    before I do, has anyone got any tips and wrinkles as to how to adjust
    it?

    The only adjustment which makes any difference is the secondary cable
    length, which is adjusted such that the brake pads have the same
    clearance on each side. The position you put the brake pads in will
    have more effect, as that will determine the angle of the canti
    calipers. I would adjust the brake pads so that at the end of the
    cable travel (brake fully applied, new pads) the straddle cable is
    perpendicular to a line from the canti post to the cable attachment at
    the end of the canti caliper. That's not easy to explain either, but
    adjusted like that I get as good a performance as I've ever had out of
    cantis.

    That's the way to do it. :-)

    Quoted message said:


    Getting rid of a setup like that can be tricky if there is not enough
    clearance to allow un-fouled cable routing to a canti hanger, and
    enough cable to the straddle to allow full operation of the brakes. V
    brakes might work, but might mess up the feel of the brakes.


    It shouldn't make a huge amount of difference to feel - the power hanger
    probably already causes more cable pull than a regular canti straddle
    arrangement. If mini-Vees will fit they would seem to be the ideal
    solution.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.