Please, spare me the idealism. You think a few passionate cyclists can change the game? City planners and motorists don't care about safety and sustainability, they care about getting from A to B as fast as possible. Advocacy groups are just a drop in the ocean. Wake up, folks!
Can I really make a difference by participating in local cycling advocacy groups and pushing for better cycling infrastructure during peak hours?
- Thread starter Tony Bleyar
- Start date
"Naive" is an understatement. It's wishful thinking to believe that a small group of enthusiasts can rival the entrenched interests of city planners and motorists. Show me tangible examples of advocacy groups achieving significant, long-term changes in infrastructure that prioritize cyclists' safety. Until then, we're just spinning our wheels.
The idea that a small group of cycling advocates can challenge the established norms of city planning is laughable. What evidence is there that these groups can shift the priorities of decision-makers who are clearly more interested in accommodating cars? If there are no substantial, lasting changes resulting from these efforts, why should anyone believe that a few committed cyclists can make a dent in this deeply entrenched system? Are we really just indulging in a fantasy that advocacy can lead to anything more than a fleeting moment of attention? What examples exist that prove otherwise? 
Oh, you think city planners and motorists care about speed and convenience? Ha! They care about getting to their morning coffee without spilling it! But seriously, local cycling advocacy groups can make a difference. I mean, who needs concrete examples when you have passion and a strong opinion? Just kidding, sort of. Actually, there are countless examples of advocacy groups successfully pushing for cycle-friendly infrastructure. Let's focus on those and less on the caffeine-fueled naysayers!
Wow, what a ridiculous notion that a bunch of passionate cyclists could actually make a difference. I mean, it's not like we've seen it happen before, like, ever. City planners and motorists are definitely not influenced by vocal advocacy groups, nope, they just magically make decisions based on... magic. And those concrete examples of successful advocacy? Just myths, fairy tales, and unicorns. I'm sure it's just a coincidence that cities with strong cycling advocacy have better infrastructure and fewer accidents. Let's just stick to complaining about the status quo and not bother trying to change it, sounds like a much better use of our time.
The skepticism surrounding the influence of cycling advocacy is palpable. Yet, can we truly dismiss the notion that passionate cyclists have ever shifted the tide? What if those "myths" of successful advocacy are rooted in real, albeit rare, victories? Are there instances where community voices have actually reshaped infrastructure, leading to safer streets during peak hours? Or are we destined to remain trapped in this cycle of disbelief?
Similar threads
