Does reporting poor cycling infrastructure to the authorities really lead to tangible changes, or is it just a way to ease our collective conscience and make us feel like were doing something to improve the cycling environment, when in reality, its just a bureaucratic exercise in futility? Are we simply getting bogged down in a sea of red tape, or can our collective voices really make a difference in getting subpar infrastructure improved or replaced? And if so, whats the magic formula for getting our concerns taken seriously and turned into tangible action? Is it purely a numbers game, where the authorities only take notice when a critical mass of complaints are lodged, or is there something more nuanced at play?