wolfix said:I agree. A rider right now has to be almost embarressed to be a cyclists in the ProTour. The guy that wins this year will have the title of winning a TDF where no one important was there. [Even if that is not true]
When other riders are adding fuel to the doping presss [Boonen] the story becomes the main event.
When doping has taken down the "nice guy" of cycling [Jan Ullrich] it makes it believable that "everyone" is doping.
This years event is not a TDF classic , nor has the legendary status of other TDF's of past. The word "epic" has to do with the fan's patience with the sport more then it applies to the riders.
I'm not at all sure that had Basso or Ullrich won - we wouldn't think "It's just because Lance wasn't there". I'm pretty sure I'd think that, I think Lance had it in the tank to win another year (though I definitely think he did the right thing, even though I wanted to be able to watch him a year more, being a new fan of him and the sport).
This year winner was suppose to end up as second best as it is, and actually - without the three biggest names, it makes things look more even, in a way.
Yes, comparing to last year at least, this peloton is riding in the shadow of a rather big elephant no one really want to talk about, but I still think we're seeing some fair bit of cycling that has nothing to do with doping.