jim beam said:i'm thinking of finally making the investment in a carbon fork - i love the ride qualities on the
bikes i've tested that have them. what experience does the group have with failures and based on
that, which would be the best to use/avoid?
There are stories of failures, but they aren't common -- I've never seen one. Jobst talks about
"just riding along" failures, but these must be extremely rare, or people would be falling down with
shattered forks on races and centuries.
Lots of folks in the 90+Kg range, like me, ride carbon forks with no problems. Mine is a Kinesis,
with a steel steerer. Works fine.
On the other hand, I do not believe there is all that much difference in ride. When you test-ride
those bikes, how can you tell how much of the ride is due to the fork, versus the new wheels, tires,
frame, etc? You can't. Biggest thing you will notice, if you are replacing a steel fork, is that the
bike will be a bit lighter (like 300-400g --- a significant amount, I guess).
I personally would be uncomfortable with a carbon steerer. But then, I prefer a threaded steerer, so
steel is an easy winner.
Quoted message said:i have a 1" steerer and am "clydesdale". ideally, i want something that's strong enough so the
frame fails before the fork when i hit that big pothole...
That's odd. Let's see: frame cost: $1000, more or less. Fork cost: $150. Which would you prefer to
fail first? I mean, in this scenario, you are going down no matter what breaks.
--
David L. Johnson
__o | When you are up to your ass in alligators, it's hard to remember _`\(,_ | that your initial
objective was to drain the swamp. -- LBJ (_)/ (_) |