Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

"best" carbon fork?

Started by Jim Beam · · Last activity · 15 posts · 1,615 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
24 September 2003
Last activity
13 October 2003
Original author
Jim Beam
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,615
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. i'm thinking of finally making the investment in a carbon fork - i love the ride qualities on the
    bikes i've tested that have them. what experience does the group have with failures and based on
    that, which would be the best to use/avoid?

    you bike shop folks - i /really/ want to hear about service failures from you!

    i have a 1" steerer and am "clydesdale". ideally, i want something that's strong enough so the frame
    fails before the fork when i hit that big pothole...

    jb

  2. "jim beam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    i'm thinking of finally making the investment in a carbon fork - i love the ride qualities on the
    bikes i've tested that have them. what experience does the group have with failures and based on
    that, which would be the best to use/avoid?

    you bike shop folks - i /really/ want to hear about service failures from you!

    i have a 1" steerer and am "clydesdale". ideally, i want something that's strong enough so the
    frame fails before the fork when i hit that big pothole...

    jb


    If you're a Clydesdale and running a 1" steerer, make sure that you get either an AL or steel
    steerer "just in case."

    Reynolds Ouzo Comps are good forks with an AL steerer.

    Mike

  3. "Mike S." <mikeshaw2@coxDOTnet> wrote in message news:93kcb.9027$vj2.1696@fed1read06...

    Quoted message said:

    "jim beam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    i'm thinking of finally making the investment in a carbon fork - i love the ride qualities on
    the bikes i've tested that have them. what experience does the group have with failures and
    based on that, which would be the best to use/avoid?

    you bike shop folks - i /really/ want to hear about service failures from you!

    i have a 1" steerer and am "clydesdale". ideally, i want something that's strong enough so the
    frame fails before the fork when i hit that big pothole...

    Quoted message said:

    If you're a Clydesdale and running a 1" steerer, make sure that you get either an AL or steel
    steerer "just in case."

    Reynolds Ouzo Comps are good forks with an AL steerer.

    Wound-up makes carbon forks for tandems. I'd look into those.

    Matt O.

  4. "jim beam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    i'm thinking of finally making the investment in a carbon fork - i love the ride qualities on the
    bikes i've tested that have them. what experience does the group have with failures and based on
    that, which would be the best to use/avoid? you bike shop folks - i /really/ want to hear about
    service failures from you! i have a 1" steerer and am "clydesdale". ideally, i want something
    that's strong enough so the frame fails before the fork when i hit that big pothole... jb


    I have a True Temper Alpha Q CX fork (all carbon 1 1/8" steerer but they also have 1"😉. I had a
    major high speed crash with it. The handle bar was bent, and turbed 90° on the steerer, the wheel
    got hit so hard that the skewer could not hold the wheel in the fork and the wheel came out of true
    (it was tightly secured!), the rider (196 lb with a 8 lb Camelback) was badly beaten up, but the
    fork was in perfect shape! I am using it daily.

    TrueTemper has different models of Alpha Q: Sub3 (295g), Pro (360g), Aero
    (380g), and a tandem model X2 (445g), but I have not tested any of them. If I ever will need an
    other carbon fork, however, I would buy an other Alpha Q due to this crash test.

    Erik L

  5. jim beam said:

    i'm thinking of finally making the investment in a carbon fork - i love the ride qualities on the
    bikes i've tested that have them. what experience does the group have with failures and based on
    that, which would be the best to use/avoid?

    There are stories of failures, but they aren't common -- I've never seen one. Jobst talks about
    "just riding along" failures, but these must be extremely rare, or people would be falling down with
    shattered forks on races and centuries.

    Lots of folks in the 90+Kg range, like me, ride carbon forks with no problems. Mine is a Kinesis,
    with a steel steerer. Works fine.

    On the other hand, I do not believe there is all that much difference in ride. When you test-ride
    those bikes, how can you tell how much of the ride is due to the fork, versus the new wheels, tires,
    frame, etc? You can't. Biggest thing you will notice, if you are replacing a steel fork, is that the
    bike will be a bit lighter (like 300-400g --- a significant amount, I guess).

    I personally would be uncomfortable with a carbon steerer. But then, I prefer a threaded steerer, so
    steel is an easy winner.

    Quoted message said:

    i have a 1" steerer and am "clydesdale". ideally, i want something that's strong enough so the
    frame fails before the fork when i hit that big pothole...

    That's odd. Let's see: frame cost: $1000, more or less. Fork cost: $150. Which would you prefer to
    fail first? I mean, in this scenario, you are going down no matter what breaks.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | When you are up to your ass in alligators, it's hard to remember _`\(,_ | that your initial
    objective was to drain the swamp. -- LBJ (_)/ (_) |

  6. In article <93kcb.9027$vj2.1696@fed1read06>, mikeshaw2@coxDOTnet says...

    Quoted message said:

    If you're a Clydesdale and running a 1" steerer, make sure that you get either an AL or steel
    steerer "just in case."

    Reynolds Ouzo Comps are good forks with an AL steerer.

    AL??? I would stick with steel if I was a big guy.
    -----------------
    Alex __O _-\<,_ (_)/ (_)

  7. "jim beam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    i'm thinking of finally making the investment in a carbon fork - i love the ride qualities on the
    bikes i've tested that have them. what experience does the group have with failures and based on
    that, which would be the best to use/avoid?

    you bike shop folks - i /really/ want to hear about service failures from you!

    i have a 1" steerer and am "clydesdale". ideally, i want something that's strong enough so the
    frame fails before the fork when i hit that big pothole...

    jb

    I've never seen a catastrophic failure of a carbon fork myself. All of the failures I've see related
    to carbon frames and forks usually have occurred at the joins of the tubes. Usually fork dropouts
    come loose, or the seat tube/BB joint will start to crack (not that the tube is failing, but the
    bond is failing where the tube joins to the bb shell, which are usually alu or some type of separate
    part). I have seen enough of these failures to make me lose some trust in carbon frames. The Trek
    OCLV bikes are much better at this, but the failure rate still far exceeds steel (only my anecdotal
    evidence to go on here..perhaps shakey ground!). They have a great guarantee and all that, but it IS
    a hassle. I've NEVER seen a loose dropout on a good steel frame or fork. I've seen at least 3 on
    carbon forks. And I've seen many more steel bikes than carbon.

    OTOH, if you inspect regularly and don't mind the return policy if you do get a bad fork or frame,
    there are benefits to be had with carbon..most people cite the ride quality and stiffness,
    lightweight. I won't argue they're not nice to ride because I do like them. But for a hammer-head
    idiot like me, I'll stick to steel and alu.

    Cheers,

    Scott..

  8. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    i have a 1" steerer and am "clydesdale". ideally, i want something that's strong enough so the
    frame fails before the fork when i hit that big pothole...

    That's odd. Let's see: frame cost: $1000, more or less. Fork cost: $150. Which would you prefer to
    fail first? I mean, in this scenario, you are going down no matter what breaks.

    that's true! i'm just real conservative.

    i was on a fast decent this summer on a shady road. hit a big pothole which i didn't see, but
    managed to stay on. it was a tremendously violent whack giving me an impressive flat spot on my
    front rim and haematomas on both palms from the the shock. but my [steel] frame & fork held.

    going carbon, i just worry that a carbon fork in the same situation might shatter. a friend's son
    was riding track about 3 or 4 years ago and his fork just splintered for no apparent reason. bloody
    nose, chipped teeth, etc. - that's why i'm asking to see what others' experience has been.

    jb

  9. Mike S.' mikeshaw2@coxDOTnet said:

    If you're a Clydesdale and running a 1" steerer, make sure that you get either an AL or steel
    steerer "just in case."

    Aluminum steerers are a terrible idea, especially for 1" steerers and _especially_ for heavy riders.
    Even the thickest of them are no better than half as stiff as a steel steerer. Surprisingly many of
    them are stuffed with a *steel* sleeve for reinforcement. That should tell you something.

    To put it in perspective, a normal 1" OD/.875" ID steel steerer is about 24% stiffer than a 1" solid
    rod of aluminum of the same length, even though the aluminum rod weighs 47% more.

    Furthermore, aluminum alloys strong enough to serve reliably as steer tubes (e.g. 7075-T6,
    7050-T7451, 7178-T651, Easton EA70, etc.) have lousy ductility and elongation characteristics.
    Meaning they won't bend much before they snap off. So much for "just in case".

    Until 1.5" headsets come to road bikes, steel is the material for steer tubes. There just isn't room
    for a decent steerer made of anything else.

    Chalo Colina

  10. I can not make any comment about long term reliability yet because I have only had it for a few
    months, but I got the Kestrel and am happy. Being 6'5", 250 lbs, I share your concerns about
    strenth. I decided that I wanted a steel steerer, and one piece legs and crown (figured fewer joints
    to fail). The Kestrel fit my critera well, and did not cost an arm and a leg.

    I will say that I did not feel a huge difference between the carbon fork and my old steel one. It is
    noticably lighter though, and does seem to dampen shock a little bit better.

    Hope this helps, Scott

    "jim beam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    i'm thinking of finally making the investment in a carbon fork - i love the ride qualities on the
    bikes i've tested that have them. what experience does the group have with failures and based on
    that, which would be the best to use/avoid?

    you bike shop folks - i /really/ want to hear about service failures from you!

    i have a 1" steerer and am "clydesdale". ideally, i want something that's strong enough so the
    frame fails before the fork when i hit that big pothole...

    jb

  11. I don't agree. I think most 1" carbon steerers today are just fine so long as you you buying a
    reputable manufacturer's fork and ensure it is professionally installed. I have a True Temper Alpha
    Q Pro (their larger rider fork) and it is easily one of the most solid and compliant forks I have
    ever ridden: steel, aluminum or carbon! I personally worry a great deal more about the bonding
    between fork blades and aluminum/steel steerers than I do a complete, well made carbon fork.

    Terry

    Mike S. said:

    "jim beam" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    i'm thinking of finally making the investment in a carbon fork - i love the ride qualities on the
    bikes i've tested that have them. what experience does the group have with failures and based on
    that, which would be the best to use/avoid?

    you bike shop folks - i /really/ want to hear about service failures from you!

    i have a 1" steerer and am "clydesdale". ideally, i want something that's strong enough so the
    frame fails before the fork when i hit that big pothole...

    jb

    If you're a Clydesdale and running a 1" steerer, make sure that you get either an AL or steel
    steerer "just in case."

    Reynolds Ouzo Comps are good forks with an AL steerer.

    Mike

  12. jim beam said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    i have a 1" steerer and am "clydesdale". ideally, i want something that's strong enough so the
    frame fails before the fork when i hit that big pothole...

    That's odd. Let's see: frame cost: $1000, more or less. Fork cost: $150. Which would you prefer
    to fail first? I mean, in this scenario, you are going down no matter what breaks.

    that's true! i'm just real conservative.

    i was on a fast decent this summer on a shady road. hit a big pothole which i didn't see, but
    managed to stay on. it was a tremendously violent whack giving me an impressive flat spot on my
    front rim and haematomas on both palms from the the shock. but my [steel] frame & fork held.

    going carbon, i just worry that a carbon fork in the same situation might shatter. a friend's son
    was riding track about 3 or 4 years ago and his fork just splintered for no apparent reason. bloody
    nose, chipped teeth, etc. - that's why i'm asking to see what others' experience has been.

    jb


    ......................

    It's so easy to put your mind at ease as many do, and just avoid carbon. Metal forks are
    time-tested, and can be quite light. If the carbon is for for weight savings, note the difference
    between the carbon fork you want and a top-drawer aluminum one. Drop your body weight by that much,
    an easy task.. anyone with any body fat can lose a pound a week by lowering what goes into the hole
    in their face by 500 calories a day. It's just a change of eating habits. Habits are cobwebs, then
    cables -- Spanish proverb.

  13. Terry Rudd said:

    I have a True Temper Alpha Q Pro (their larger rider fork) and it is easily one of the most solid
    and compliant forks I have ever ridden

    "Most solid and compliant"-- whew, brother, you smell like you've been huffing those perfume cards
    from the magazine stand! Do you mean "stiff yet flexible", or is it "rigid but also springy"?
    Perhaps "confidence-inspiring yet lively"!

    Try these on:
    - Reassuringly heavy yet surprisingly light
    - Glitteringly shiny but glare-free
    - Noxiously stinky yet gently fragrant

    How about "oxymoronic, but at the same time mutually exclusive"!

    Quoted message said:

    I personally worry a great deal more about the bonding between fork blades and aluminum/steel
    steerers than I do a complete, well made carbon fork.

    If you think that "all carbon" forks have continuous fibers running from the legs, through the
    crown, into the steerer, you are mistaken. The manufacturers of these forks use carbon tubing for
    the steerers AFAIK. And that means there is only a glue line of epoxy holding one part to the other
    regardless of what material the parts are made of. Either you have faith in glue, or you do not.

    That is an issue apart from the fact that carbon steerers can break without bending and without
    warning, while metal steerers will often show some signs of failure before they give way.

    Chalo Colina

  14. Quoted message said:

    I have a True Temper Alpha Q CX fork I had a major high speed crash with it. The handle bar was
    bent, and turbed 90° on the steerer, the wheel got hit so hard that the skewer could not hold the
    wheel in the fork and the wheel came out of true (it was tightly secured!), the rider (196 lb with
    a 8 lb Camelback) was badly beaten up, but the fork was in perfect shape! I am using it daily.

    Erik,

    Well, you had better check it VERY carefully.

    My friend, too, had an Alpha Q fork, BARELY tapped it crossing a railroad track, and both fork
    blades collapsed in a "catastrophic" failure. The only history on the fork other than being
    ridden 20,000 miles or so by a 125 lb woman was that she had two crashes on the bike--in both
    cases the fork appeared to be "perfect" and she used subsequently "used it daily." Until now,
    that is. As mentioned below, this is what Jobst Brandt would definitely describe as a "failure
    while riding around."

    Kent

  15. "KEM" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have a True Temper Alpha Q CX fork I had a major high speed crash with it. The handle bar was
    bent, and turbed 90° on the steerer, the wheel got hit so hard that the skewer could not hold
    the wheel in the fork and the wheel came out of true (it was tightly secured!), the rider (196
    lb with a 8 lb Camelback) was badly beaten up, but the fork was in perfect shape! I am using it
    daily.

    Erik,

    Well, you had better check it VERY carefully.

    My friend, too, had an Alpha Q fork, BARELY tapped it crossing a railroad track, and both fork
    blades collapsed in a "catastrophic" failure. The only history on the fork other than being ridden
    20,000 miles or so by a 125 lb woman was that she had two crashes on the bike--in both cases the
    fork appeared to be "perfect" and she used subsequently "used it daily." Until now, that is. As
    mentioned below, this is what Jobst Brandt would definitely describe as a "failure while riding
    around."

    That's pretty scary, and illustrates how there's no telling the condition of a carbon fork, short of
    X-raying it or something (which is what they do with race car and aircraft parts). Thus, it's
    probably important to know a carbon fork's history. If it's been crashed, retire it.

    The same goes for aluminum. I've never really trusted aluminum road forks. In fact, I wonder if the
    fork in your story actually broke at the the aluminum steerer.

    The big advantage of a steel fork is that it "wears its heart on its sleeve." Any damage, or lack
    thereof, is immediately apparent.

    Matt O.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.