Baka

R Brickston said:

Billy Baka's brain x-ray was pictured in an article that is part of
National Geographic's ongoing anthropology research series:

http://tinyurl.com/jnbd5

D'oh! (Gotta admit, LOL )

I think he really plonked you finally; ta freaking da!

Bill Sornson said:

R Brickston said:

Billy Baka's brain x-ray was pictured in an article that is part of
National Geographic's ongoing anthropology research series:

http://tinyurl.com/jnbd5

D'oh! (Gotta admit, LOL )

I think he really plonked you finally; ta freaking da!

I did plonk him and the only way I see his childish posts is when
someone else replies to him. Since Mozilla and Thunderbird are open
source and I am a decent programmer I may get the source code and build
a better filter module that looks for his name inside the message, too.
Bill Baka

Bill Sornson said:

R Brickston said:

Billy Baka's brain x-ray was pictured in an article that is part of
National Geographic's ongoing anthropology research series:

http://tinyurl.com/jnbd5

D'oh! (Gotta admit, LOL )

I think he really plonked you finally; ta freaking da!

yeah, that's a real heartbreaker!

Bill Baka said:

Bill Sornson said:

R Brickston said:

Billy Baka's brain x-ray was pictured in an article that is part of
National Geographic's ongoing anthropology research series:

http://tinyurl.com/jnbd5

D'oh! (Gotta admit, LOL )

I think he really plonked you finally; ta freaking da!

I did plonk him and the only way I see his childish posts is when
someone else replies to him. Since Mozilla and Thunderbird are open
source and I am a decent programmer I may get the source code and build
a better filter module that looks for his name inside the message, too.
Bill Baka

Billy, my "childish" posts are certainly no worse than your long tall
tales about how macho you allegedly are. Hardly anyone believes your
bullcrap.

"Bill Baka" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Bill Sornson said:

R Brickston said:

Billy Baka's brain x-ray was pictured in an article that is part of
National Geographic's ongoing anthropology research series:

http://tinyurl.com/jnbd5

D'oh! (Gotta admit, LOL )

I think he really plonked you finally; ta freaking da!

I did plonk him and the only way I see his childish posts is when someone
else replies to him. Since Mozilla and Thunderbird are open source and I
am a decent programmer I may get the source code and build a better filter
module that looks for his name inside the message, too.
Bill Baka

I think I'm going to have to put R Brickston on the permanent block list,
too. All he seems to do is rant against you. I have very few people on
the permanent block list. I usually just ignore their left-leaning rants.

Charles of Schaumburg.

n5hsr said:

"Bill Baka" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Bill Sornson said:

R Brickston wrote:
> Billy Baka's brain x-ray was pictured in an article that is part of
> National Geographic's ongoing anthropology research series:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/jnbd5
D'oh! (Gotta admit, LOL )

I think he really plonked you finally; ta freaking da!

I did plonk him and the only way I see his childish posts is when someone
else replies to him. Since Mozilla and Thunderbird are open source and I
am a decent programmer I may get the source code and build a better filter
module that looks for his name inside the message, too.
Bill Baka

I think I'm going to have to put R Brickston on the permanent block list,
too. All he seems to do is rant against you. I have very few people on
the permanent block list. I usually just ignore their left-leaning rants.

Charles of Schaumburg.

I'm a day or 2 ahead of you since he is my only permanent plonk.
Bill Baka

Bill Baka said:

I did plonk him and the only way I see his childish posts is when
someone else replies to him. Since Mozilla and Thunderbird are open
source and I am a decent programmer I may get the source code and build
a better filter module that looks for his name inside the message, too.
Bill Baka

Doesn't Thunderbird let you filter by regex on the message body as it is?
Seems like a pretty stark missing feature.

--
Jim

n5hsr said:

"Bill Baka" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Bill Sornson said:

R Brickston wrote:
> Billy Baka's brain x-ray was pictured in an article that is part of
> National Geographic's ongoing anthropology research series:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/jnbd5

D'oh! (Gotta admit, LOL )

I think he really plonked you finally; ta freaking da!

I did plonk him and the only way I see his childish posts is when someone
else replies to him. Since Mozilla and Thunderbird are open source and I
am a decent programmer I may get the source code and build a better filter
module that looks for his name inside the message, too.
Bill Baka

I think I'm going to have to put R Brickston on the permanent block list,
too. All he seems to do is rant against you. I have very few people on
the permanent block list. I usually just ignore their left-leaning rants.

Charles of Schaumburg.

Left? Have you been paying attention, Chuck?

"R Brickston" <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

n5hsr said:

"Bill Baka" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Bill Sornson wrote:
> R Brickston wrote:
>> Billy Baka's brain x-ray was pictured in an article that is part of
>> National Geographic's ongoing anthropology research series:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/jnbd5
>
> D'oh! (Gotta admit, LOL )
>
> I think he really plonked you finally; ta freaking da!
I did plonk him and the only way I see his childish posts is when
someone
else replies to him. Since Mozilla and Thunderbird are open source and I
am a decent programmer I may get the source code and build a better
filter
module that looks for his name inside the message, too.
Bill Baka

I think I'm going to have to put R Brickston on the permanent block list,
too. All he seems to do is rant against you. I have very few people on
the permanent block list. I usually just ignore their left-leaning rants.

Charles of Schaumburg.

Left? Have you been paying attention, Chuck?

Yes I have. Me thinks the gentleman doth protest too much.

Charles of Schaumburg

n5hsr said:

"R Brickston" <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

n5hsr said:

"Bill Baka" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Bill Sornson wrote:
>> R Brickston wrote:
>>> Billy Baka's brain x-ray was pictured in an article that is part of
>>> National Geographic's ongoing anthropology research series:
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/jnbd5
>>
>> D'oh! (Gotta admit, LOL )
>>
>> I think he really plonked you finally; ta freaking da!
> I did plonk him and the only way I see his childish posts is when
> someone
> else replies to him. Since Mozilla and Thunderbird are open source and I
> am a decent programmer I may get the source code and build a better
> filter
> module that looks for his name inside the message, too.
> Bill Baka

I think I'm going to have to put R Brickston on the permanent block list,
too. All he seems to do is rant against you. I have very few people on
the permanent block list. I usually just ignore their left-leaning rants.

Charles of Schaumburg.

Left? Have you been paying attention, Chuck?

Yes I have. Me thinks the gentleman doth protest too much.

Charles of Schaumburg

Chuck, if your going to try and fool us by being a clever dolt and
quote The Bard, please try and get it right.

Jim Higson said:

Bill Baka said:

I did plonk him and the only way I see his childish posts is when
someone else replies to him. Since Mozilla and Thunderbird are open
source and I am a decent programmer I may get the source code and build
a better filter module that looks for his name inside the message, too.
Bill Baka

Doesn't Thunderbird let you filter by regex on the message body as it is?
Seems like a pretty stark missing feature.

It has an everything possible filter on e-mail but not on news, which
strangely enough is in the same program. It strikes me as strange too.
Bill Baka

Brickston ("thick as a brick"😉 wrote, in part:

Quoted message said:

Chuck, if your going to try and fool us by being a clever dolt and
quote The Bard, please try and get it right.

Or the right homophone of "your", which in the case of YOUR post, would
be YOU'RE. If YOU'RE gonna rip on someone's misquoting, you have to be
perfect yourself. Or you look like a dumbass.

Oh, and "try and fool" is also wrong, try "try TO fool".

Hope that helps,

D'ohBoy

D'ohBoy said:

Brickston ("thick as a brick"😉 wrote, in part:

Quoted message said:

Chuck, if your going to try and fool us by being a clever dolt and
quote The Bard, please try and get it right.

Or the right homophone of "your", which in the case of YOUR post, would
be YOU'RE. If YOU'RE gonna rip on someone's misquoting, you have to be
perfect yourself. Or you look like a dumbass.

Oh, and "try and fool" is also wrong, try "try TO fool".

Hope that helps,

D'ohBoy

"Your, "You're." Common speeling mistake of the masses. Quoting
Shakespeare is on another level with a much higher threshold of
correct usage.

D'ohBoy said:

Brickston ("thick as a brick"😉 wrote, in part:

Quoted message said:

Chuck, if your going to try and fool us by being a clever dolt and
quote The Bard, please try and get it right.

Or the right homophone of "your", which in the case of YOUR post, would
be YOU'RE. If YOU'RE gonna rip on someone's misquoting, you have to be
perfect yourself. Or you look like a dumbass.

Oh, and "try and fool" is also wrong, try "try TO fool".

Hope that helps,

D'ohBoy

Finally,
Somebody else exposing our biggest jerk.
Cheers,
Bill Baka

R Brickston said:

D'ohBoy said:

Brickston ("thick as a brick"😉 wrote, in part:

Quoted message said:

Chuck, if your going to try and fool us by being a clever dolt and
quote The Bard, please try and get it right.

Or the right homophone of "your", which in the case of YOUR post, would
be YOU'RE. If YOU'RE gonna rip on someone's misquoting, you have to be
perfect yourself. Or you look like a dumbass.

Oh, and "try and fool" is also wrong, try "try TO fool".

Hope that helps,

D'ohBoy

"Your, "You're." Common speeling mistake of the masses. Quoting
Shakespeare is on another level with a much higher threshold of
correct usage.

But R,

You accept errors common to the masses in yourself but upbraid others
who fail to quote Shakespeare verbatim?!

Your usage of "try and" is offensive too, and the mark of the commoner.

Hypocrisy. Don't pretend to be something you aren't.

D'ohBoy, who holds to a higher standard those who hold others to a
higher standard.

Bill Baka said:

D'ohBoy said:

Brickston ("thick as a brick"😉 wrote, in part:

Quoted message said:

Chuck, if your going to try and fool us by being a clever dolt and
quote The Bard, please try and get it right.

Or the right homophone of "your", which in the case of YOUR post, would
be YOU'RE. If YOU'RE gonna rip on someone's misquoting, you have to be
perfect yourself. Or you look like a dumbass.

Oh, and "try and fool" is also wrong, try "try TO fool".

Hope that helps,

D'ohBoy

Finally,
Somebody else exposing our biggest jerk.
Cheers,
Bill Baka

Oh, Bill,

You're an annoying [censored] too.

D'ohBoy

D'ohBoy said:

R Brickston said:

D'ohBoy said:

Brickston ("thick as a brick"😉 wrote, in part:

> Chuck, if your going to try and fool us by being a clever dolt and
> quote The Bard, please try and get it right.
Or the right homophone of "your", which in the case of YOUR post, would
be YOU'RE. If YOU'RE gonna rip on someone's misquoting, you have to be
perfect yourself. Or you look like a dumbass.

Oh, and "try and fool" is also wrong, try "try TO fool".

Hope that helps,

D'ohBoy

"Your, "You're." Common speeling mistake of the masses. Quoting
Shakespeare is on another level with a much higher threshold of
correct usage.

But R,

You accept errors common to the masses in yourself but upbraid others
who fail to quote Shakespeare verbatim?!

Your usage of "try and" is offensive too, and the mark of the commoner.

Hypocrisy. Don't pretend to be something you aren't.

D'ohBoy, who holds to a higher standard those who hold others to a
higher standard.

A. I am not Brickston.
B. I never quote the bard.
Bill Baka

D'ohBoy said:

Bill Baka said:

D'ohBoy said:

Brickston ("thick as a brick"😉 wrote, in part:

> Chuck, if your going to try and fool us by being a clever dolt and
> quote The Bard, please try and get it right.
Or the right homophone of "your", which in the case of YOUR post, would
be YOU'RE. If YOU'RE gonna rip on someone's misquoting, you have to be
perfect yourself. Or you look like a dumbass.

Oh, and "try and fool" is also wrong, try "try TO fool".

Hope that helps,

D'ohBoy

Finally,
Somebody else exposing our biggest jerk.
Cheers,
Bill Baka

Oh, Bill,

You're an annoying [censored] too.

D'ohBoy

I merely seed the group when it gets slow. Dolan seems to be going after
the real top 'annoying' poster but won't trim his replies.
Bill Baka

D'ohBoy said:

R Brickston said:

D'ohBoy said:

Brickston ("thick as a brick"😉 wrote, in part:

> Chuck, if your going to try and fool us by being a clever dolt and
> quote The Bard, please try and get it right.

Or the right homophone of "your", which in the case of YOUR post, would
be YOU'RE. If YOU'RE gonna rip on someone's misquoting, you have to be
perfect yourself. Or you look like a dumbass.

Oh, and "try and fool" is also wrong, try "try TO fool".

Hope that helps,

D'ohBoy

"Your, "You're." Common speeling mistake of the masses. Quoting
Shakespeare is on another level with a much higher threshold of
correct usage.

But R,

You accept errors common to the masses in yourself but upbraid others
who fail to quote Shakespeare verbatim?!

Well, should The Bard be better quoted or should one pay more
attention to common gramatical errors and spelling?

Quoted message said:

Your usage of "try and" is offensive too, and the mark of the commoner.

Yes, yet another often occuring failure of the masses to write well.
However, I'm not ashamed and go forth on usenet unrepentant.

Quoted message said:

Hypocrisy. Don't pretend to be something you aren't.

I ain't.

Quoted message said:

D'ohBoy, who holds to a higher standard those who hold others to a
higher standard.

Brickston doesn't care about common writing errors, but takes an extra
critical look at anyone quoting The Bard.

Would you pay the same attention to detail when you are dressing prior
to picking up the local bar-fly banging queen as you would for a date
with say, a pre-pregnant/birthing Julia Roberts?