Mark Hickey wrote:
> Raptor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Mark Hickey wrote:
>>> Well said, John. Though it will fall on the deaf ears of those
>>> convinced due to political expediency that they somehow know more of
>>> what's going on halfway around the world than those who are actually
>>> participating (and re-upping).
>> Why do you assume anyone calling for a change is ignorant?
>
> I'm not. I'm saying that those who claim to know more about local
> conditions in Iraq and Afghanistan are ignorant.
But we've seen a plethora of signs that the top leadership DON'T know
what's going on. And we've also seen the hard numbers, which indicate
that the only thing that's in our favor is the body count. That was
always in our favor, and means nothing against sufficiently determined
enemies.
>> Better
>> question: why do you assume Shrub or Rumsfeld will ever pull their heads
>> out of their asses? And why do you assume defeating radical Islam is
>> their top priority?
>
> Hey, for all I know lunch is their top priority. Other than that, all
> I can do is go by what they CLAIM is their top priority. And it's
> hard to imagine one that's higher right now.
Their claims are the only thing indicating their top priority is winning
the war. A smart person goes beyond claims. We can look at the patterns,
the facts, the reactions to facts. Based on all that, the top priority
of the current people currently in charge is staying in charge.
> But my participation in this thread has gone on long enough (as has
> the thread). Again, I heartily thank John for his service to our
> country, and welcome him home. History will prove GWB right or wrong
> on his approach to the radical Islam problem, no matter what political
> expediency says today.
We already have five years of history, as long as WWII took, and it
doesn't look good for Shrub.
--
Lynn Wallace
http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
If FDR fought fascism the way Bush fights terrorism, we'd all be
speaking German now.