"Lanceandrew" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:did not know you liked being on the bleeding edge of shoe models doug.
i like
others to be the beta site....and then read reviews at rw, rrs,
etc...on the
general character of the shoe....and see if a consensus is forming.
As I said I had used the 20NN line for years and years doing all my
ultra training and races in them. The changes for the 90's did not help
me but I don't know if the every one else loved them. Only Asics knows
and I don't think they readily give out those numbers.
Quoted message said:$90. just itching to be the first kid on the block w/the new shoe?
if i were
gonna go $90, i'd plop another $20 more and take a hard look at the
kayano
x....no?
I did look at the Kayono but the sole looked just like the 90's so I did
not try them. When you're going to spend 10 to 20+ hours in the same
shoes, money is not an issue.
Quoted message said:do you do most of your off-road running in these shoes doug?
I do ALL my running in the same model road, trail, 10k, 100miles. I'm
not one to try to shave a few ounces during a race. I'm not referencing
your ordeal at NYC.
Quoted message said:however if after a couple of runs the shoe was simply not agreeing
with me..i
would not turn them into the walk around shoe and absolutely will send
them
back for a refund. that's one thing i feel people don't do enough
of, "return
shoes".
I could have sent them back but chose to keep them for my shorter runs.
Quoted message said:Ya know what would be kind of interesting and fun Doug. Do an email
or fax to
Asics and tell them how they screwed you on the 2090 and ask them why
you
should buy a 2100 now? Keep/Retain the response..buy the 2100...and
then
respond back to Asics on how you feel about the shoe.
I did send off a very detailed description of why the changes to the
90's failed for me. I never even got a form response, Thanks for your
comments.
-Doug