General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Asics 2100

Started by Doug Freese · · Last activity · 82 posts · 2,456 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 November 2004
Last activity
20 November 2004
Original author
Doug Freese
Posts
82
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,456
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 82
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The 2100's are out and for those that had problems with 2090's, they
    have redesigned the sole pattern. For me that is good news since the
    change to the 90's was a disaster for me. The distribution and placement
    of the plugs would make my one foot feel like I had a rock in my sock.
    Anywho, I'm going to order a pair and give them a try. I wore all the
    20nn series with blind love until the 90's. A run of about 1.5 hours
    should tell me quickly if the change is for the better.

    I've been wearing the NB 2112's and they don't irritate and particular
    spot but the feel like bricks after a two hour run.

    I know they are hot off the shelf but has anyone tried them and care to
    comment?

    -DougF

  2. Quoted message said:

    A run of about 1.5 hours
    should tell me quickly if the change is for the better.

    Negative. It take longer thaqn that for your feet and leg muscles to adjust to
    them. Try walking in them for a couple of days first. Then do a gradual
    buildup.

  3. "FabulustRunner" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A run of about 1.5 hours
    should tell me quickly if the change is for the better.

    Negative. It take longer thaqn that for your feet and leg muscles to
    adjust to
    them. Try walking in them for a couple of days first. Then do a
    gradual
    buildup.

    I did not mean to imply that I would run for that length of time right
    out of box. My point was the problem even after break-in would manifest
    about 1.5 hours into a run.

    OTOH, while I can't not speak to the 2100's I can tell you that I could
    take the 20NN series out of the box and run 20+ miles without any
    problem and have done that many, many times. If course I don't know how
    the 2100's behave. You can never go wrong allowing shoes to slowly break
    in but for some models, it isn't necessary.

    -DF

  4. Quoted message said:

    I did not mean to imply that I would run for that length of time right
    out of box.

    Whew! You had me worried <wiping sweat from brow>

    Quoted message said:

    My point was the problem even after break-in would manifest
    about 1.5 hours into a run.

    Gotcha.

    Quoted message said:

    OTOH, while I can't not speak to the 2100's I can tell you that I could
    take the 20NN series out of the box and run 20+ miles without any
    problem and have done that many, many times.

    I've had a few models over the years I could do that with. I think it indicates
    a good choice for your feet.

    Quoted message said:

    If course I don't know how
    the 2100's behave. You can never go wrong allowing shoes to slowly break

    True.

  5. did not know you liked being on the bleeding edge of shoe models doug. i like
    others to be the beta site....and then read reviews at rw, rrs, etc...on the
    general character of the shoe....and see if a consensus is forming.

    $90. just itching to be the first kid on the block w/the new shoe? if i were
    gonna go $90, i'd plop another $20 more and take a hard look at the kayano
    x....no? do you do most of your off-road running in these shoes doug?

    however if after a couple of runs the shoe was simply not agreeing with me..i
    would not turn them into the walk around shoe and absolutely will send them
    back for a refund. that's one thing i feel people don't do enough of, "return
    shoes".

    Ya know what would be kind of interesting and fun Doug. Do an email or fax to
    Asics and tell them how they screwed you on the 2090 and ask them why you
    should buy a 2100 now? Keep/Retain the response..buy the 2100...and then
    respond back to Asics on how you feel about the shoe.

  6. << turn them into the walk around shoe and absolutely will send them
    back for a refund. that's one thing i feel people don't do enough of, "return
    shoes". >>

    ....hazard a guess ~|

    _______
    Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
    <A
    HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo">http://journal
    s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo</A>

  7. << fax to
    Asics and tell them how they screwed you on the 2090 and ask them why you
    should buy a 2100 now? Keep/Retain the response..buy the 2100...and then
    respond back to Asics on how you feel about the shoe. >>

    sucks

    _______
    Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
    <A
    HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo">http://journal
    s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo</A>

  8. "Doug Freese" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The 2100's are out and for those that had problems with 2090's, they
    have redesigned the sole pattern. For me that is good news since the
    change to the 90's was a disaster for me. The distribution and placement
    of the plugs would make my one foot feel like I had a rock in my sock.
    Anywho, I'm going to order a pair and give them a try. I wore all the
    20nn series with blind love until the 90's. A run of about 1.5 hours
    should tell me quickly if the change is for the better.

    I've been wearing the NB 2112's and they don't irritate and particular
    spot but the feel like bricks after a two hour run.

    I know they are hot off the shelf but has anyone tried them and care to
    comment?

    The 2080s were the first "real" running shoes I bought, and I was very happy
    with them. Unfortunately, when their time was up I found that the 2090s were
    uncomfortably narrow in the toebox. FWIW, to answer Lance's
    question--dropping an extra $20 on the Kayanos gets you a shoe that feels
    and responds quite differently. Which is a waste of money, of course, if you
    like what the 20X0s do. It's kind of like saying "I really liked my Ford
    Escort, but they don't make 'em any more. Do you think I'll like the Focus?"
    and hearing back, "why try the Focus, when for an extra $20,000 you can get
    an Explorer?"

  9. << It's kind of like saying "I really liked my Ford
    Escort, but they don't make 'em any more. Do you think I'll like the Focus?"
    and hearing back, "why try the Focus, when for an extra $20,000 you can get
    an Explorer?"

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Just a Landrover roving night ~
    Roll over, Rover.
    What Hocus Pocus, wrought you?
    Irony, true, but you!
    Just a well-wrought space explorer
    Who tears my heart ~
    Stokes my art, too.
    Wears down my resistance
    To time's prism.
    What Hocus Pocus, what rhymes me?
    Wrap your golden serpentine
    Chain round me,
    Tie me
    Tight,
    Bound true.
    You!

    _______
    Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
    <A
    HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo">http://journal
    s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo</A>

  10. Leafing through rec.running, I read DrLith's message of 16 Nov 2004:

    Quoted message said:

    The 2080s were the first "real" running shoes I bought, and I was very
    happy with them. Unfortunately, when their time was up I found that
    the 2090s were uncomfortably narrow in the toebox. FWIW, to answer
    Lance's question--dropping an extra $20 on the Kayanos gets you a shoe
    that feels and responds quite differently. Which is a waste of money,
    of course, if you like what the 20X0s do. It's kind of like saying "I
    really liked my Ford Escort, but they don't make 'em any more. Do you
    think I'll like the Focus?" and hearing back, "why try the Focus, when
    for an extra $20,000 you can get an Explorer?"

    I had the GT-2030s back in '98. I don't even remember what they looked
    like. All I have in my log is "305 miles, too stiff." I can't believe I ran
    that far in them if they really wear too stiff. I assume they've improved
    on this model. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 4 and GTS 5 were the first running
    shoes that allowed me to run 15+ miles out of the box. I would like to try
    the 2100s and throw them into the rotation.

    Is the 2100 a similar shoe to the GTS 5?

    Phil M.

  11. << To time's prism.
    What Hocus Pocus, what rhymes me?
    Wrap your golden serpentine
    Chain round me,
    Tie me
    Tight,
    Bound true.
    You! >>

    Are you my Ecco
    Or my rhyme?
    Are you real,
    And do you hear
    The same
    As me? Or
    Am I
    Alone,
    Hearing..My voice
    Only.

    _______
    Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
    <A
    HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo">http://journal
    s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo</A>

  12. << What Hocus Pocus, what rhymes me?
    Wrap your golden serpentine
    Chain round me, >>

    ....my voice,
    Hoarse,
    So tired, from
    Screaming after
    You...
    Horse,
    Or hoarseraqddish?
    Or kaddish?
    Or mother,
    Mine?
    I await your
    Answer
    tome.

    _______
    Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
    <A
    HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo">http://journal
    s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo</A>

  13. << ...my voice,
    Hoarse,
    So tired, from
    Screaming after
    You...
    Horse,
    Or hoarseraqddish? >>

    ...or a hazy, \crazy salad
    daze?

    _______
    Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
    <A
    HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo">http://journal
    s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo</A>

  14. Quoted message said:

    try
    the 2100s and throw them into the rotation.

    Save me a web search. How much?

  15. << You...
    Horse,
    Or hoarseraqddish? >>

    ...or a hazy, \crazy salad
    daze? >>

    ....who speaks
    now to me?

    _______
    Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
    <A
    HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo">http://journal
    s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo</A>

  16. Quoted message said:

    i like
    others to be the beta site....and then read reviews at rw, rrs, etc...on the
    general character of the shoe....and see if a consensus is forming.

    Me too.

    Quoted message said:

    $90.

    TY, you answered my last post.

    Quoted message said:

    just itching to be the first kid on the block w/the new shoe? i

    <scuffys>

    Quoted message said:

    Do an email or fax to
    Asics and tell them how they screwed you on the 2090 and ask them why you
    should buy a 2100 now?

    Would you write to Chevrolet and complain about the Blazer you've been driving
    for the last 10 years?

  17. Quoted message said:

    Kayanos gets you a shoe that feels


    and responds quite differently.
    ____

    i disagree with you and why turn to inappropriate analogies as opposed to
    speaking to the issue of the two shoes?

    i think you're doing that because you're not very knowleged on the two shoes
    and it's easier to speak off-topic. the kayano x has all the technology of
    the 2100 _plus!_. in fact, both are made for medium for feet w/medium to low
    arches.

    please, give me a break..these are not wildly different shoes at all (as you
    suggest). the kayano x is a verticle upgrade and it's my opinion that the
    majority of the people that like a 2100 would also be fine w/a kayano x.

    plus the 2100 is an unknown. you can atleast read dozens of reviews on the
    kayano x from numerous different boards and sites. in addition to that,
    knowing the OP is into off-road running....the kayano x is going to hold up
    better to the rigors of off-road running being a more sturdy shoe capable of
    supporting the heavier runnner.
    in sum, i don't think it's a stretch at all to sugges the kayano x translating
    just fine for the would be 2100 buyer. there are more points suggesting it can
    than it can't.

    but don't listen to me...if i knew anything about shoes i would not be healing
    from severe blisters right now....

    go for it dougy, buy into the hype, be the beta site, pay for the R&D and
    advertising, let us know how the shoe is so i can buy it in the summer for $39
    in clearance when the new 2100 model comes out

  18. I was about to blast you until I read this:

    Quoted message said:

    but don't listen to me...if i knew anything about shoes i would not be
    healing
    from severe blisters right now....

    Uh huh...

  19. "DrLith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    You still in love, Lithy babe?

  20. "Lanceandrew" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    did not know you liked being on the bleeding edge of shoe models doug.
    i like
    others to be the beta site....and then read reviews at rw, rrs,
    etc...on the
    general character of the shoe....and see if a consensus is forming.

    As I said I had used the 20NN line for years and years doing all my
    ultra training and races in them. The changes for the 90's did not help
    me but I don't know if the every one else loved them. Only Asics knows
    and I don't think they readily give out those numbers.

    Quoted message said:

    $90. just itching to be the first kid on the block w/the new shoe?
    if i were
    gonna go $90, i'd plop another $20 more and take a hard look at the
    kayano
    x....no?

    I did look at the Kayono but the sole looked just like the 90's so I did
    not try them. When you're going to spend 10 to 20+ hours in the same
    shoes, money is not an issue.

    Quoted message said:

    do you do most of your off-road running in these shoes doug?

    I do ALL my running in the same model road, trail, 10k, 100miles. I'm
    not one to try to shave a few ounces during a race. I'm not referencing
    your ordeal at NYC.

    Quoted message said:

    however if after a couple of runs the shoe was simply not agreeing
    with me..i
    would not turn them into the walk around shoe and absolutely will send
    them
    back for a refund. that's one thing i feel people don't do enough
    of, "return
    shoes".

    I could have sent them back but chose to keep them for my shorter runs.

    Quoted message said:

    Ya know what would be kind of interesting and fun Doug. Do an email
    or fax to
    Asics and tell them how they screwed you on the 2090 and ask them why
    you
    should buy a 2100 now? Keep/Retain the response..buy the 2100...and
    then
    respond back to Asics on how you feel about the shoe.

    I did send off a very detailed description of why the changes to the
    90's failed for me. I never even got a form response, Thanks for your
    comments.

    -Doug

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.