Road Cycling · Public discussion

Armstrong and Lemond

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 106 posts · 4,368 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
18 July 2005
Last activity
23 July 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
106
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,368
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 106
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Interesting interview, but I was a bit suprised that Lance is still so
    irritated with Lemond. It's really too bad that Lemond and Lance don't
    have a better relationship. I just hope that Lance will play a bigger
    role in US cycling then Lemond has. I think that Lemond could have
    really helped racing in the US if he did more.

    "PLAYBOY: If you win another Tour or three, will you retire, sit around
    on the couch and get fat?
    ARMSTRONG:: I'll be a fitness junkie forever, not out of shape like
    some guys. But I'm not naming names... achoo-lemond!

    PLAYBOY: During that sneeze one side of your mouth mentioned Greg
    LeMond, your boyhood hero, who won three Tours but now rips you. He
    suspects you're a doper. What's your relationship with LeMond?
    ARMSTRONG:: None. What he did in 1989 and 1990 was phenomenal. But
    Greg's not even worth talking about today. And I don't need to hear
    from him -- he'd only shove his foot farther down his mouth."

  2. (http://www.playboy.com/arts-entertainment/features/lancearmstrong/index.html
    )

    Sorry forgot to include the url....

  3. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Interesting interview, but I was a bit suprised that Lance is still so
    irritated with Lemond. It's really too bad that Lemond and Lance don't
    have a better relationship. I just hope that Lance will play a bigger
    role in US cycling then Lemond has. I think that Lemond could have
    really helped racing in the US if he did more.

    "PLAYBOY: If you win another Tour or three, will you retire, sit around
    on the couch and get fat?
    ARMSTRONG:: I'll be a fitness junkie forever, not out of shape like
    some guys. But I'm not naming names... achoo-lemond!

    PLAYBOY: During that sneeze one side of your mouth mentioned Greg
    LeMond, your boyhood hero, who won three Tours but now rips you. He
    suspects you're a doper. What's your relationship with LeMond?
    ARMSTRONG:: None. What he did in 1989 and 1990 was phenomenal. But
    Greg's not even worth talking about today. And I don't need to hear
    from him -- he'd only shove his foot farther down his mouth."


    What I always found stupid about greg is how he in his latter years would
    always talk up his chances in the tour and falter miserably. year after
    year.

    Laz

  4. Come on now - even when Greg was winning we ALL knew he was a whiny
    little baby. That didn't stop him from winning but let's face it - he
    never had to grow up and he plainly didn't.

    Lance is something else altogether. I expect to see some really big
    things from him in the future. He isn't just a pair of legs attached to
    a brain the size of a vole's.

  5. [email hidden] wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    (http://www.playboy.com/arts-entertainment/features/lancearmstrong/inde
    x.html )

    Sorry forgot to include the url....

    Thanks for the link.

    Looks like the author reads rbr because Lafferty was mentioned:

    "He is also reviled by a vocal minority who call him a dope-abusing
    slimeball."

    NS

  6. Nev Shea said:

    Looks like the author reads rbr because Lafferty was mentioned:
    "He is also reviled by a vocal minority who call him a dope-abusing
    slimeball."

    I don't recall Lafferty evel calling LANCE a slimeball. Anyway vocal
    minority sounds like a good name for a rock band.

  7. "Donald Munro" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Nev Shea said:

    Looks like the author reads rbr because Lafferty was mentioned:
    "He is also reviled by a vocal minority who call him a dope-abusing
    slimeball."

    I don't recall Lafferty evel calling LANCE a slimeball. Anyway vocal
    minority sounds like a good name for a rock band.

    The furthest I gone is to say that, IMO, a prima facae case has been made
    that Armstrong has used illegal performance enhancing substances. That
    could be rebutted by direct answers from Armstrong to the difficult
    questions that all but Walsh and Ballestier are willing to ask. Perhaps
    some of those questions will be asked in any of several court cases
    involving Armstrong,strong--a point that Daniel Coyle has made in his book
    and in interviews.

    Vocal minorities are always better than silent majorities. :-)

  8. Donald Munro said:
    Quoted message said:

    Anyway vocal minority sounds like a good name for a rock band.

    B. Lafferty said:

    Vocal minorities are always better than silent majorities. :-)

    Silent majority sounds a bit like early Philip Glass.

  9. On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:23:40 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The furthest I gone is to say that, IMO, a prima facae case has been made
    that Armstrong has used illegal performance enhancing substances.

    You obviously don't know the meaning of prima facae.

  10. "Jack Hollis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:23:40 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The furthest I gone is to say that, IMO, a prima facae case has been made
    that Armstrong has used illegal performance enhancing substances.

    You obviously don't know the meaning of prima facae.

    Do tell us the meaning of "prima facae" also spelled "facie" (mostly in the
    US).

  11. "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jack Hollis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:23:40 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The furthest I gone is to say that, IMO, a prima facae case has been made
    that Armstrong has used illegal performance enhancing substances.

    You obviously don't know the meaning of prima facae.

    Do tell us the meaning of "prima facae" also spelled "facie" (mostly in
    the US).

    It's French, right?

    PRIMA FACIE: Latin for "at first view." Refers to the minimum amount of
    evidence a plaintiff must have to avoid having a case dismissed. It is said
    that the plaintiff must make a prima facie case.

    Jim Flom, Attorney at Law

  12. "Jim Flom " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:0ORCe.137359$tt5.32368@edtnps90...

    Quoted message said:

    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jack Hollis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:23:40 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >The furthest I gone is to say that, IMO, a prima facae case has been
    >made
    >that Armstrong has used illegal performance enhancing substances.

    You obviously don't know the meaning of prima facae.

    Do tell us the meaning of "prima facae" also spelled "facie" (mostly in
    the US).

    It's French, right?

    PRIMA FACIE: Latin for "at first view." Refers to the minimum amount of
    evidence a plaintiff must have to avoid having a case dismissed. It is
    said that the plaintiff must make a prima facie case.

    Jim Flom, Attorney at Law

    Latin--but then you're not Rome trained.

  13. B. Lafferty said:


    "Jack Hollis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:23:40 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The furthest I gone is to say that, IMO, a prima facae case has been made
    that Armstrong has used illegal performance enhancing substances.

    You obviously don't know the meaning of prima facae.

    Do tell us the meaning of "prima facae" also spelled "facie" (mostly in the
    US).

    Prime Feces := [censored] "at the face" circumstantial evidence

  14. "gwhite" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    B. Lafferty said:


    "Jack Hollis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:23:40 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >The furthest I gone is to say that, IMO, a prima facae case has been
    >made
    >that Armstrong has used illegal performance enhancing substances.

    You obviously don't know the meaning of prima facae.

    Do tell us the meaning of "prima facae" also spelled "facie" (mostly in
    the
    US).

    Prime Feces := [censored] "at the face" circumstantial evidence

    That's almost funny. :-)

  15. Quoted message said:

    Interesting interview, but I was a bit suprised that Lance is still so
    irritated with Lemond. It's really too bad that Lemond and Lance don't
    have a better relationship. I just hope that Lance will play a bigger
    role in US cycling then Lemond has. I think that Lemond could have
    really helped racing in the US if he did more.

    "PLAYBOY: If you win another Tour or three, will you retire, sit around
    on the couch and get fat?
    ARMSTRONG:: I'll be a fitness junkie forever, not out of shape like
    some guys. But I'm not naming names... achoo-lemond!

    PLAYBOY: During that sneeze one side of your mouth mentioned Greg
    LeMond, your boyhood hero, who won three Tours but now rips you. He
    suspects you're a doper. What's your relationship with LeMond?
    ARMSTRONG:: None. What he did in 1989 and 1990 was phenomenal. But
    Greg's not even worth talking about today. And I don't need to hear
    from him -- he'd only shove his foot farther down his mouth."

    What a sad, unclassy, anger-fueled, immature side of Armstrong he shows
    us. So much for the modesty and grace he supposedly developed as a
    cancer victim, then survivor. Those qualities are apparently saved for
    his loyal friends and briefly after refreshers in media training.

    Did he have the same ugly words for Merckx before Merckx lost weight
    last year?

    Lemond shoving his foot farther down his mouth? Et tu, Lance.

  16. <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    What a sad, unclassy, anger-fueled, immature side of Armstrong he shows
    us.

    Sounds like a perfect fit for RBR.

  17. gwhite said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You obviously don't know the meaning of prima facae.

    Do tell us the meaning of "prima facae" also spelled "facie" (mostly in the
    US).

    Prime Feces := [censored] "at the face" circumstantial evidence

    Prima Facie \PRY-muh-FAY-shee; -shuh\, adverb:
    At first view; on the first appearance.

    =================================================
    adjective:
    1. True, valid, or adequate at first sight; as it seems at first
    sight; ostensible.
    2. Self-evident; obvious.
    3. (Law) Sufficient to establish a fact or a case unless disproved.
    =================================================

    PF is not circumstantial. The only real PF evidence of doping is a
    confirmed positive blood test. That is sufficent to establish the
    fact of doping. Even possession would not, in itself, be PF evidence
    that someone actually took dope.

    So to say there's a PF case is simply incorrect.

    If you want a legal term to describe LA and drugs, you might try
    reasonable suspicion and even that's a stretch. Reasonable suspicion
    is the standard (in the US) that allows police agencies to conduct an
    investigation and/or obtain search warrants and wire taps.

  18. Jack Hollis a écrit :

    Quoted message said:


    PF is not circumstantial. The only real PF evidence of doping is a
    confirmed positive blood test. That is sufficent to establish the
    fact of doping. Even possession would not, in itself, be PF evidence
    that someone actually took dope.

    So to say there's a PF case is simply incorrect.

    If you want a legal term to describe LA and drugs, you might try
    reasonable suspicion and even that's a stretch. Reasonable suspicion
    is the standard (in the US) that allows police agencies to conduct an
    investigation and/or obtain search warrants and wire taps.

    Well, Lance is doing much better than Marion Jones, who has been
    systematically excluded from invitational events, despite never
    having tested positive. Like Lance, her accusers are untrustworthy
    people with an axe to grind.

    -ilan

  19. Laz said:
    Quoted message said:


    What I always found stupid about greg is how he in his latter years would
    always talk up his chances in the tour and falter miserably. year after
    year.


    He was always *fat* too... wonder if that had anything to do with his
    performance? Nah... everybody else was/is on drugs... that has to be
    it!

  20. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Interesting interview, but I was a bit suprised that Lance is still so
    irritated with Lemond. It's really too bad that Lemond and Lance don't
    have a better relationship. I just hope that Lance will play a bigger
    role in US cycling then Lemond has. I think that Lemond could have
    really helped racing in the US if he did more.

    "PLAYBOY: If you win another Tour or three, will you retire, sit around
    on the couch and get fat?
    ARMSTRONG:: I'll be a fitness junkie forever, not out of shape like
    some guys. But I'm not naming names... achoo-lemond!

    PLAYBOY: During that sneeze one side of your mouth mentioned Greg
    LeMond, your boyhood hero, who won three Tours but now rips you. He
    suspects you're a doper. What's your relationship with LeMond?
    ARMSTRONG:: None. What he did in 1989 and 1990 was phenomenal. But
    Greg's not even worth talking about today. And I don't need to hear
    from him -- he'd only shove his foot farther down his mouth."

    What a sad, unclassy, anger-fueled, immature side of Armstrong he shows
    us. So much for the modesty and grace he supposedly developed as a
    cancer victim, then survivor. Those qualities are apparently saved for
    his loyal friends and briefly after refreshers in media training.

    Did he have the same ugly words for Merckx before Merckx lost weight
    last year?

    Lemond shoving his foot farther down his mouth? Et tu, Lance.

    In the interview Armstrong tells how devastated he was by those
    who abandoned him. Left him for dead. Imagine living and breathing
    and treated like the dead. After that he could see clearly who his
    friends are. GL is not one of them. You want Armstrong to play
    kissy face with that?

    --
    Michael Press

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.