The usual from someone who swears by the scientific method. I will know. The point is you won't and you will still be parroting assumptions that is doesn't work. I will find out.
No, the point is that your methodology will not allow you to "find out," nor is a sample size of one likely to give a definitive answer.
-- Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"
Illness 9 has become so emotionally unbalanced over nobody responding to her she has changed her ID to get past most of our spam filters over 30 times in the last 6 months.
Anybody wanting a list of her used email addies send a self address stamped email to me and I will send you the generic filter how to delete her permanently.
"mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Ilsa9.10" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
The problem is I will. Anth
No, the problem is
The problem is that ilsa9, had some "problem", and has morphed into ilsa 9.10. Cute. Wonder if it might be to get past filters? Oh
I had my gallbladder Ultrasounded for stones and found it was clear after 5-6 flushes. I never had it scanned before the flushes.
My wife had her gallbladder diagnosed full and after 5-6 flushes had it out after a few severe attacks months later. Her gallbladder was rock hard with scar tissue. Stones were not discussed at that point. She flushed many very large stones during her flushes. All medics agreed that once a gallbladder becomes defective it will not stop filling with stones.
Do it. It cleans your liver and feels great. Gallbladder? Maybe.
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Did they scan the gall bladder and find stones then no/reduced stones
after
Quoted message said:
the flush? Did you get the stones sent off to a lab? Cheers Anth
"Gymmy Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
We had absolutely no problem with this flush. It worked and caused no discomfort except the hunger for the day. A couple bouts of diarrhea in
the
Quoted message said:
late morning and it was basically over except a good healthful feeling
or
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
cleanliness.
Many stones came out each time but my wife's gallbladdar was so hard
they
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
thought she had cancer. Biopsy on it proved hardened with scar tissue
from
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
so much abuse to it. The stones destroyed it. The stones IMO are from
the
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
liver mostly and this is excellent for your health to cleanse your liver anyway.
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
We'll see. Anth
"Gymmy Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > Most of stones for us came out after resuming normal eating again.
Don't
Quoted message said:
> wory, you can't miss them because of their turquoise colour. > > > "Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > (and on top of that I added 8floz of celery juice 20:42) > > Anth > > > > "Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:[email hidden]... > > > > > >
Illness 9 has become so emotionally unbalanced over nobody responding to her she has changed her ID to get past most of our spam filters over 30 times in the last 6 months.
Anybody wanting a list of her used email addies send a self address stamped email to me and I will send you the generic filter how to delete her permanently.
Just send me your Debit card and pin # and I'll tell you on your birthday.
"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I don't know anyone who is against conventional medicine, organized
medicine is
Quoted message said:
a different story. There are all kinds of parasites.
====================== Can you direct me to a website covering those claimed to be removed by these cleanses? When you say parasite do you mean internal/intestinal worms of some kind? Or are you including viruses, bacterial and fungi as well?
Please note, I don't wish to get involved in any personal conflicts between the posters here. I'm simply looking for answers.
"Bew" <qw@nonamewhatsover> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I was bored when I did mine , just something to do ya know ? - satisfied ?
Bew
============================ Satisfied? What are you referring to? You did a cleanse because of boredom and not because a test showed you could benefit by it?
If you're bored you can do volunteer work and keep yourself occupied. Have you looked into doing volunteer work at a local Animal Shelter or Nursing Home? Even local Hospitals usually welcome volunteers.
"Ilsa9.10" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040305201321.20524.00000996@mb-> >>
Quoted message said:
Jan wrote that she saw large parasites in her feces when she imagined a
Loa-Loa
Quoted message said:
infestation.
==================== Had she been to Africa? That is not a parasite found in the USA as far as I know. Could the Lab have made a mistake in identifying the parasite she submitted for identification? Also, unless I missed something these are not passed in the stool since they don't infest the GI track. A purge of the GI tract would not remove them. See: http://www.biosci.ohio-state.edu/~parasite/lifecycles/loa_lifecycle.html
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
The usual from someone who swears by the scientific method. I will know. The point is you won't and you will still be parroting assumptions that is doesn't work. I will find out. Anth
====================== How will you know Anth? I can't picture a normal rational person picking through their purged bowel contents (diarrhea) in a toilet bowl looking for tiny stones or a sandlike substance. If you do or don't find them how will you know if you removed them or not? Or removed all of them? This also goes for these "parasites" no one seems to know the names of.
In any case please wear disposable gloves if you're going to spend time handling your feces.
Well apparently according to alt med folklore it comes out with your pee. To my knowledge I don't have any stones, there was arguments raised on here that the cleanse is nothing more than a chemical reaction in the body. I want to find out. Anth
"Kim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
The usual from someone who swears by the scientific method. I will know. The point is you won't and you will still be parroting assumptions that
is
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
doesn't work. I will find out. Anth
====================== How will you know Anth? I can't picture a normal rational person picking through their purged bowel contents (diarrhea) in a toilet bowl looking
for
Quoted message said:
tiny stones or a sandlike substance. If you do or don't find them how
will
Quoted message said:
you know if you removed them or not? Or removed all of them? This also goes for these "parasites" no one seems to know the names of.
In any case please wear disposable gloves if you're going to spend time handling your feces.
"Gymmy Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I had my gallbladder Ultrasounded for stones and found it was clear after 5-6 flushes. I never had it scanned before the flushes.
My wife had her gallbladder diagnosed full and after 5-6 flushes had it
out
Quoted message said:
after a few severe attacks months later. Her gallbladder was rock hard
with
Quoted message said:
scar tissue. Stones were not discussed at that point. She flushed many
very
Quoted message said:
large stones during her flushes. All medics agreed that once a gallbladder becomes defective it will not stop filling with stones.
Do it. It cleans your liver and feels great. Gallbladder? Maybe.
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Did they scan the gall bladder and find stones then no/reduced stones
after
Quoted message said:
the flush? Did you get the stones sent off to a lab? Cheers Anth
"Gymmy Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
We had absolutely no problem with this flush. It worked and caused no discomfort except the hunger for the day. A couple bouts of diarrhea
in
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
the
Quoted message said:
late morning and it was basically over except a good healthful feeling
or
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
cleanliness.
Many stones came out each time but my wife's gallbladdar was so hard
they
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
thought she had cancer. Biopsy on it proved hardened with scar tissue
from
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
so much abuse to it. The stones destroyed it. The stones IMO are from
the
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
liver mostly and this is excellent for your health to cleanse your
liver
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
anyway.
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > We'll see. > Anth > > "Gymmy Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > Most of stones for us came out after resuming normal eating
again.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Don't > > wory, you can't miss them because of their turquoise colour. > > > > > > "Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:[email hidden]... > > > (and on top of that I added 8floz of celery juice 20:42) > > > Anth > > > > > > "Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > > news:[email hidden]... > > > > > > > > > > > >
Subject: Re: anth and the flush From: "Kim" [email hidden] Date: 3/6/2004 10:08 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>
"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I don't know anyone who is against conventional medicine, organized
medicine is
Quoted message said:
a different story. There are all kinds of parasites.
====================== Can you direct me to a website covering those claimed to be removed by these cleanses? When you say parasite do you mean internal/intestinal worms of some kind? Or are you including viruses, bacterial and fungi as well?
Please note, I don't wish to get involved in any personal conflicts between the posters here. I'm simply looking for answers.
Kim
I figured that would be coming next.
However, you thanked Rich for his information and said I understand. Then you posted to RB that he shouldn't say things he couldn't prove.
After I showed you Rich's pattern of behavior, you eagerly believed his lies. You didn't ask for any proof.
If you really want to read about parasites, get one of Hulda Clark's books.
Subject: Re: anth and the flush - loa loa? From: "Kim" [email hidden] Date: 3/6/2004 10:25 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>
"Ilsa9.10" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040305201321.20524.00000996@mb-> >>
Quoted message said:
Jan wrote that she saw large parasites in her feces when she imagined a
Loa-Loa
Quoted message said:
infestation.
==================== Had she been to Africa? That is not a parasite found in the USA as far as I know. Could the Lab have made a mistake in identifying the parasite she submitted for identification? Also, unless I missed something these are not passed in the stool since they don't infest the GI track. A purge of the GI tract would not remove them. See: http://www.biosci.ohio-state.edu/~parasite/lifecycles/loa_lifecycle.html
Kim
Kim,
You should reaslize by now you can't believe Andrew Kingoff who is NOT IIsa. I don't recall ever saying I saw any *large* parasites. He can prove it by showing where I said it, or be labled a liar AGAIN.
Furthermore this has been discussed over and over and over and twisted and twisted and twisted, nad I refused to discuss it again. You are being used as a sucker and baited by Andrew and Rich.
Subject: Re: anth and the flush From: "Anth" [email hidden] Date: 3/6/2004 10:47 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>
Well apparently according to alt med folklore it comes out with your pee. To my knowledge I don't have any stones, there was arguments raised on here that the cleanse is nothing more than a chemical reaction in the body. I want to find out. Anth
"Kim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
The usual from someone who swears by the scientific method. I will know. The point is you won't and you will still be parroting assumptions that
is
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
doesn't work. I will find out. Anth
====================== How will you know Anth? I can't picture a normal rational person picking through their purged bowel contents (diarrhea) in a toilet bowl looking
for
Quoted message said:
tiny stones or a sandlike substance. If you do or don't find them how
will
Quoted message said:
you know if you removed them or not? Or removed all of them? This also goes for these "parasites" no one seems to know the names of.
In any case please wear disposable gloves if you're going to spend time handling your feces.
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 06:47:19 -0000, "Anth" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Well apparently according to alt med folklore it comes out with your pee.
Why do you want to take the chance that whatever you take is going to result in your peeing out some chemical reaction from what you ingest?? Is your judgement always this impaired??
Quoted message said:
To my knowledge I don't have any stones, there was arguments raised on here that the cleanse is nothing more than a chemical reaction in the body. I want to find out.
Let's see. You don't think you have any stones. The only reason you are doing this cleanse is to see if it is more than just a chemical reaction? Lord have mercy.
Aloha,
Rich
Quoted message said:
Anth
"Kim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
The usual from someone who swears by the scientific method. I will know. The point is you won't and you will still be parroting assumptions that
is
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
doesn't work. I will find out. Anth
====================== How will you know Anth? I can't picture a normal rational person picking through their purged bowel contents (diarrhea) in a toilet bowl looking
for
Quoted message said:
tiny stones or a sandlike substance. If you do or don't find them how
will
Quoted message said:
you know if you removed them or not? Or removed all of them? This also goes for these "parasites" no one seems to know the names of.
In any case please wear disposable gloves if you're going to spend time handling your feces.
Subject: Re: anth and the flush - loa loa? From: "Kim" [email hidden] Date: 3/6/2004 10:25 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>
"Ilsa9.10" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040305201321.20524.00000996@mb-> >>
Quoted message said:
Jan wrote that she saw large parasites in her feces when she imagined a
Loa-Loa
Quoted message said:
infestation.
==================== Had she been to Africa? That is not a parasite found in the USA as far as I know. Could the Lab have made a mistake in identifying the parasite she submitted for identification? Also, unless I missed something these are not passed in the stool since they don't infest the GI track. A purge of the GI tract would not remove them. See: http://www.biosci.ohio-state.edu/~parasite/lifecycles/loa_lifecycle.html
Kim
Kim,
You should reaslize by now you can't believe Andrew Kingoff who is NOT IIsa. I don't recall ever saying I saw any *large* parasites. He can prove it by showing where I said it, or be labled a liar AGAIN.
Once again Jan demonstrates her tactics. Instead of addressing the issue of whether she claimed a lab test revealed that she was infested with loa loa parasite which is ONLY found in Africa, Jan focuses on a diversion. She wants to change the focus to whether she specifically used the word large. If a parasite is visible to the naked eye it may be considered large. Many parasites invisible to the naked eye are small.
Quoted message said:
Furthermore this has been discussed over and over and over and twisted and twisted and twisted, nad I refused to discuss it again.
Another one of Jan's tactics. Accuse others of the reason why she won't discuss it. Jan won't discuss it because she realizes that it is essentially impossible for her to have been infected with loa loa unless she visited Africa. Has there been a single case of confirmed loa loa in US where someone did not visit Africa??
Quoted message said:
You are being used as a sucker and baited by Andrew and Rich.
Gratuitous personal attacks. More evidence of Jan's despicable tactics.
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 06:47:19 -0000, "Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
To my knowledge I don't have any stones, there was arguments raised on here that the cleanse is nothing more than a chemical reaction in the body. I want to find out.
Let's see. You don't think you have any stones. The only reason you are doing this cleanse is to see if it is more than just a chemical reaction? Lord have mercy.
Indeed. And Anth had the gall (pun intended) to take me to task for supposedly not understanding statistics and the scientific method. As you say, Lord have mercy....
-- Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"