"Pete Fagerlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:"Spider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| "Pete Fagerlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
| > "Spider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| >
| > <snip>
| >
| > | > It still doesn't make sense.
| > |
| > | To you, Pete, to you.
| >
| > The funniest thing about this discussion is that the person who claimed
to
| > know what MTBR posters are like, doesn't read it.
|
| No, the funniest thing about this thread is you saying "it still doesn't make sense" when it
| actually DOES make sense, and has from the beginning (except to you.)
Yeah, it "makes sense," to folks who admit they don't even read MTBR. Yeah, perfect sense.
Clue: Define the difference between "I don't read it regularly," "I don't read it" and "I have read
it in the past, but don't bother any more."
Ding! We have a pedantic winner!
Quoted message said:But it's a nice diversionary attempt on
| your part.
Nope.
Uhh, yup.
Quoted message said:No diversion.
LOL!
Quoted message said:Just facts.
Yeah, "facts." Spin some more, please...
Quoted message said:Just commenting from experience, unlike others.
Ahhh, yes. The "superiority play." More classic Fagerlin.
Quoted message said:| > Classic AMB.
|
| Classic Fagerlin.
Yup. The truth, as opposed to silly generalizations based upon...no experience.
Ooops, now who made an unsubstantiated generalization? LOL! "The truth" - you are too funny.
Spider