Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Alternative to mtbr?

Started by Bomba · · Last activity · 16 posts · 2,119 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
7 February 2003
Last activity
11 February 2003
Original author
Bomba
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,119
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Bikemagic.com is a British site that has a review section in much a similar style to mtbr. There are
    a couple of differences though. Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of
    a.m-b. Secondly, they give out prizes each week for those who have given good reviews. In BM's
    word's, "you'll not win with any old this is 'wickid/cr@p' nonsense." There is some of that about,
    but it's mainly reserved for the adult-bmx bits.

    There aren't a huge amount of reviews at the mo', but it's looking quite good. Hopefully, they can
    maintain the decent reviews and it will be a useful resource.

    bikemagic.comreview.asp

    --
    a.m-b FAQ: t-online.deambfaq.htm

    b.bmx FAQ: t-online.debmx faq.htm

  2. bomba said:

    Bikemagic.com is a British site that has a review section in much a similar style to mtbr. There
    are a couple of differences though. Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that
    of a.m-b. Secondly, they give out prizes each week for those who have given good reviews.

    we have a local board called bustedspoke.com which is quite similar.

  3. "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    | Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of a.m-b.

    What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?

    --
    Pete Fagerlin

    Save Fruita trails! petefagerlin.combookcliffs.htm

  4. Pete F says:

    Quoted message said:

    What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?

    They don't let Rimmer in there? ;-)

  5. P e t e F a g e r l i n said:

    | Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of a.m-b.

    What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?

    Ok, badly phrased, but I meant the contributors to both generally aren't testosterone-fueled,
    illiterate jump/shuttle monkeys who call everybody 'dude'.

  6. "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
    | P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:
    |
    | > | Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of
    a.m-b.
    | >
    | > What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?
    |
    | Ok, badly phrased, but I meant the contributors to both generally aren't testosterone-fueled,
    | illiterate jump/shuttle monkeys who call everybody 'dude'.

    Sorry. That still doesn't make sense.

  7. bomba said:

    In BM's word's, "you'll not win with any old this is 'wickid/cr@p' nonsense." There is some of that
    about, but it's mainly reserved for the adult-bmx bits.

    Wise guy aren't cha....adult-bmx....why I ought a!...

    peeeeesssssssssssssss, Bill The mind serves properly as a window glass rather than as a reflector,
    that is, the mind should give an immediate view instead of an interpretation of the world.
    :-]

  8. "Pete Fagerlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
    | P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:
    |
    | > | Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of
    a.m-b.
    | >
    | > What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?
    |
    | Ok, badly phrased, but I meant the contributors to both generally aren't testosterone-fueled,
    | illiterate jump/shuttle monkeys who call everybody 'dude'.

    Sorry. That still doesn't make sense.

    You forgot the all-important qualifier "to me" at the end of your sentence.

    To those of us with functional brain cells it made plenty of sense.

    Spider "if the shoe fits..."

  9. "Spider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    | "Pete Fagerlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...
    | > "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    | > "]news:[email hidden]...
    | > | P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:
    | > |
    | > | > | Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of
    | > a.m-b.
    | > | >
    | > | > What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?
    | > |
    | > | Ok, badly phrased, but I meant the contributors to both generally
    aren't
    | > | testosterone-fueled, illiterate jump/shuttle monkeys who call
    everybody
    | > | 'dude'.
    | >
    | > Sorry. That still doesn't make sense.
    |
    | You forgot the all-important qualifier "to me" at the end of your
    sentence.
    |
    | To those of us with functional brain cells it made plenty of sense.
    |
    | Spider "if the shoe fits..."

    Hmmm...I wonder how many folks you, or bomba, have met from MTBR?

    It still doesn't make sense.

    --
    Pete Fagerlin

    Save Fruita trails! petefagerlin.combookcliffs.htm

  10. Stephen Baker <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Pete F says:

    Quoted message said:

    What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?

    They don't let Rimmer in there? ;-)

    Bazturd.

    Shaun aRe

  11. "Pete Fagerlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Spider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    | "Pete Fagerlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...
    | > "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    | > "]news:[email hidden]...
    | > | P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:
    | > |
    | > | > | Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of
    a.m-b.
    | > | >
    | > | > What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?
    | > |
    | > | Ok, badly phrased, but I meant the contributors to both generally
    aren't
    | > | testosterone-fueled, illiterate jump/shuttle monkeys who call
    everybody
    | > | 'dude'.
    | >
    | > Sorry. That still doesn't make sense.
    |
    | You forgot the all-important qualifier "to me" at the end of your
    sentence.
    |
    | To those of us with functional brain cells it made plenty of sense.
    |
    | Spider "if the shoe fits..."

    Hmmm...I wonder how many folks you, or bomba, have met from MTBR?

    Oooo, an impressive non sequitur. Very nicely done.

    Quoted message said:

    It still doesn't make sense.

    To you, Pete, to you.

    Spider

  12. "Spider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    <snip>

    | > It still doesn't make sense.
    |
    | To you, Pete, to you.

    The funniest thing about this discussion is that the person who claimed to know what MTBR posters
    are like, doesn't read it.

    Classic AMB.

  13. Pete Fagerlin said:

    | > It still doesn't make sense.
    |
    | To you, Pete, to you.

    The funniest thing about this discussion is that the person who claimed to know what MTBR posters
    are like, doesn't read it.

    I've read it on occasions - there's good stuff, but there's a lot of [censored] stuff. I don't read it
    regularly, so if I've made an erroneous generalisation and there are no longer large numbers of
    teenagers with spelling and shift key problems, I'll retract my comments.

    Quoted message said:

    Classic AMB.

    Ah, without large generalisations and your pedantry, things just wouldn't be the same :~)

  14. "Pete Fagerlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Spider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    <snip>

    | > It still doesn't make sense.
    |
    | To you, Pete, to you.

    The funniest thing about this discussion is that the person who claimed to know what MTBR posters
    are like, doesn't read it.

    No, the funniest thing about this thread is you saying "it still doesn't make sense" when it
    actually DOES make sense, and has from the beginning (except to you.) But it's a nice diversionary
    attempt on your part.

    Quoted message said:

    Classic AMB.

    Classic Fagerlin.

    Spider

  15. "Spider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    | "Pete Fagerlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...
    | > "Spider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    | >
    | > <snip>
    | >
    | > | > It still doesn't make sense.
    | > |
    | > | To you, Pete, to you.
    | >
    | > The funniest thing about this discussion is that the person who claimed
    to
    | > know what MTBR posters are like, doesn't read it.
    |
    | No, the funniest thing about this thread is you saying "it still doesn't make sense" when it
    | actually DOES make sense, and has from the beginning (except to you.)

    Yeah, it "makes sense," to folks who admit they don't even read MTBR. Yeah, perfect sense.

    But it's a nice diversionary attempt on
    | your part.

    Nope. No diversion. Just facts. Just commenting from experience, unlike others.

    | > Classic AMB.
    |
    | Classic Fagerlin.

    Yup. The truth, as opposed to silly generalizations based upon...no experience.

    --
    Pete Fagerlin

    Save Fruita trails! petefagerlin.combookcliffs.htm

  16. "Pete Fagerlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Spider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    | "Pete Fagerlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...
    | > "Spider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    | >
    | > <snip>
    | >
    | > | > It still doesn't make sense.
    | > |
    | > | To you, Pete, to you.
    | >
    | > The funniest thing about this discussion is that the person who claimed
    to
    | > know what MTBR posters are like, doesn't read it.
    |
    | No, the funniest thing about this thread is you saying "it still doesn't make sense" when it
    | actually DOES make sense, and has from the beginning (except to you.)

    Yeah, it "makes sense," to folks who admit they don't even read MTBR. Yeah, perfect sense.

    Clue: Define the difference between "I don't read it regularly," "I don't read it" and "I have read
    it in the past, but don't bother any more."

    Ding! We have a pedantic winner!

    Quoted message said:

    But it's a nice diversionary attempt on
    | your part.

    Nope.

    Uhh, yup.

    Quoted message said:

    No diversion.

    LOL!

    Quoted message said:

    Just facts.

    Yeah, "facts." Spin some more, please...

    Quoted message said:

    Just commenting from experience, unlike others.

    Ahhh, yes. The "superiority play." More classic Fagerlin.

    Quoted message said:

    | > Classic AMB.
    |
    | Classic Fagerlin.

    Yup. The truth, as opposed to silly generalizations based upon...no experience.

    Ooops, now who made an unsubstantiated generalization? LOL! "The truth" - you are too funny.

    Spider

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.