UK and Europe · Public discussion

almost first crash

Started by Shumit · · Last activity · 37 posts · 783 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
31 October 2007
Last activity
3 November 2007
Original author
Shumit
Posts
37
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
783
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–37 of 37
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Doki said:

    It really is far less daunting than it sounds.

    The other really nasty one to watch for when scooting up the left is
    that one of the queuing vehicles may allow a gap to open up in front
    and flash their headlights to allow an oncoming vehicle to turn right
    into a side road. This can be hard to spot especially if the gap-
    leaver is a large vehicle, and the right-turner tends to go fast to
    get through the gap. Be extra careful when passing side roads.

    Then there's the peds crossing between stationary vehicles to avoid
    too...

  2. Shumit said the following on 01/11/2007 09:57:

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think I could overtake on the outside yet as its enough work
    thinking about traffic on my side let alone on-coming.

    I think you'll find that it's actually easier and safer on the outside.
    You have to watch for the traffic to start moving to time your move
    back to the inside, and also watch for other two-wheeled thingies
    already on the outside.

    Don't follow the example in LSMike's video though until you do have more
    experience :-)

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    Highway rule 163 tells you that you should "only overtake on the left if the
    vehicle in front is signalling to turn right, and there is room to do so"
    and "stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues. If the queue
    on your right is moving more slowly than you are, you may pass on the left".
    Basically, they're saying it's not a good idea to overtake someone on the
    left hand side. I really can't see how you're going to get very far in a
    compensation case if you were directly disobeying the highway code.

    OTOH Cyclecraft, which is published by the Stationary Office, says it is
    acceptable and accepted practice for bike to pass on the left with care.
    It is also common enough for long enough to be unlikely to be
    successfully challenged in Court. I tend to prefer the right but mix
    left and right in dense traffic according to circumstances.

    --
    Tony

    " I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong."
    Bertrand Russell

  4. On Oct 31, 8:47 pm, "burtthebike" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Undertaking is permitted if traffic is stopped or slow moving. You'd do
    well to avoid considering the legality of it though, better aim to avoid
    getting left hook'ed. Expect drivers to turn left at junctions, they
    frequently don't look for cyclists on their left.

    Quoted message said:

    Or the passenger that decides to jump out of a queued vehicle and flings
    the door into your path with gay abandon.

    Excuse me, but I don't think there's any place on this group for sexual
    discrimination.

    What? Where do you get that from?

  5. POHB said:

    Sounds like the Isle of Man is a very dangerous place to cycle.

    No, not really.

    --
    From the sunny Isle of Man.
    Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.

  6. Doki said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Why not just overtake on the right hand side?

    You can't/shouldn't when there is little room or vehicles are turning
    right. You could then just stop and wait.

    IME there's often more room on the right than there is on the left,

    I agree there is "often" more room on the right, but there is also often
    more room on the left - particularly on main roads with one lane in each
    direction. Vehicles then tend to be positioned closer to the middle of the
    road than the edge.

    I use whichever side is more convenient and only proceed in either case when
    I think it is safe enough. Just as you do on the left, when overtaking on
    the right, you either have to keep your speed very low or allow loads of
    room.

    Quoted message said:

    and it's far less likely to disappear than room on the LHS of a car.
    I'd prefer not to end up under a car than to chance it on the basis
    that the driver should be checking over his left shoulder...

    There are plenty of times when it's unlikely for a car to steer left - most
    obviously when it's stationary in a long queue of traffic on a straight bit
    of road with no turnings.

    ~PB

  7. POHB said:

    The other really nasty one to watch for when scooting up the left is
    that one of the queuing vehicles may allow a gap to open up in front
    and flash their headlights to allow an oncoming vehicle to turn right
    into a side road. This can be hard to spot especially if the gap-
    leaver is a large vehicle, and the right-turner tends to go fast to
    get through the gap. Be extra careful when passing side roads.

    Then there's the peds crossing between stationary vehicles to avoid
    too...

    Peds crossing between stationary vehicles are more of a problem (because
    they're harder to spot) when you're filtering up the outside than when
    going up the inside, though. Many years ago I almost hit a ped when she
    stepped in front of me as I filtered (slowly) up the outside of a queue
    of cars on my motorbike.

    --
    Danny Colyer <http://www.redpedals.co.uk>
    Reply address is valid, but that on my website is checked more often
    "The plural of anecdote is not data" - Frank Kotsonis

  8. Danny Colyer said:
    POHB said:

    The other really nasty one to watch for when scooting up the left is
    that one of the queuing vehicles may allow a gap to open up in front
    and flash their headlights to allow an oncoming vehicle to turn right
    into a side road. This can be hard to spot especially if the gap-
    leaver is a large vehicle, and the right-turner tends to go fast to
    get through the gap. Be extra careful when passing side roads.

    That's just as much a problem on the outside as it is on the left,
    IMO.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Then there's the peds crossing between stationary vehicles to avoid
    too...

    Peds crossing between stationary vehicles are more of a problem (because
    they're harder to spot) when you're filtering up the outside than when
    going up the inside, though. Many years ago I almost hit a ped when she
    stepped in front of me as I filtered (slowly) up the outside of a queue
    of cars on my motorbike.

    --
    Danny Colyer <http://www.redpedals.co.uk>

    I think peds are just as hard to spot when filtering on either side.

  9. [ Hope I haven't mashed the attributions. Apologies if so ]

    LSMike said:
    Quoted message said:
    POHB said:

    The other really nasty one to watch for when scooting up the left is
    that one of the queuing vehicles may allow a gap to open up in front
    and flash their headlights to allow an oncoming vehicle to turn right

    Quoted message said:

    That's just as much a problem on the outside as it is on the left,
    IMO.

    On the outside, at least the oncoming vehicle can (might) see you. On
    the inside, that's less likely.

    Quoted message said:

    I think peds are just as hard to spot when filtering on either side.

    I find peds easier to spot when I'm on the outside: when cycling in the
    gutter, a pedestrian might step off the pavement without a moment's
    notice, whereas if I'm in the middle of the road at least they'll have
    had to cross a lane of traffic before they're in a position to collide
    with me, and I get a reasonable chance to see them through
    windscreens/over the car roofs/etc

    YMMV, mine often does.

    -dan

  10. LSMike said the following on 01/11/2007 13:16:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the door into your path with gay abandon.

    What? Where do you get that from?

    "gay" abandon??? I think burtthebike must have forgotten to put the
    smiley in. At least, I hope he did.

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  11. Quoted message said:

    On the outside, at least the oncoming vehicle can (might) see you. On
    the inside, that's less likely.

    The imporatnt distinction is that on the outside you can see the
    oncoming vehicle that is about to turn right, if you're on the inside
    you are hidden from each other by the big vehicle that has stopped for
    it.

    Quoted message said:

    I find peds easier to spot when I'm on the outside: when cycling in the
    gutter, a pedestrian might step off the pavement without a moment's
    notice, whereas if I'm in the middle of the road at least they'll have
    had to cross a lane of traffic before they're in a position to collide
    with me, and I get a reasonable chance to see them through
    windscreens/over the car roofs/etc

    Also, peds crossing from your right think they're home safe and dash
    for the kerb across your path when you're on the inside, whereas if
    you're on the outside they're more careful coz they're stepping out
    into the middle of the road.

    Neither of which mean I don't scoot up the inside, but I do it slowly
    and carefully (mostly).

  12. Quoted message said:

    [ Hope I haven't mashed the attributions. Apologies if so ]

    LSMike said:
    Quoted message said:

    On 01/11/2007 10:58, POHB wrote:
    > The other really nasty one to watch for when scooting up the left is
    > that one of the queuing vehicles may allow a gap to open up in front
    > and flash their headlights to allow an oncoming vehicle to turn right


    That's just as much a problem on the outside as it is on the left,
    IMO.

    On the outside, at least the oncoming vehicle can (might) see you. On
    the inside, that's less likely.

    but someone in a left hand side road turning right onto the road you
    are on can't

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I think peds are just as hard to spot when filtering on either side.

    I find peds easier to spot when I'm on the outside: when cycling in the
    gutter, a pedestrian might step off the pavement without a moment's
    notice, whereas if I'm in the middle of the road at least they'll have
    had to cross a lane of traffic before they're in a position to collide
    with me, and I get a reasonable chance to see them through
    windscreens/over the car roofs/etc

    Filtering on the offside either gives you more space (no oncoming
    taffic) or makes the crossing ped more circumspect (moving oncoming
    taffic). filtering between two way stationary traffic offers no
    advantage but isn't much worse than the inside of a queue. You just
    have to slow down as you pass large vehicles that are stationary

    best wishes
    james

  13. Quoted message said:

    [ Hope I haven't mashed the attributions. Apologies if so ]

    LSMike said:
    Quoted message said:

    On 01/11/2007 10:58, POHB wrote:
    > The other really nasty one to watch for when scooting up the left is
    > that one of the queuing vehicles may allow a gap to open up in front
    > and flash their headlights to allow an oncoming vehicle to turn right


    That's just as much a problem on the outside as it is on the left,
    IMO.

    On the outside, at least the oncoming vehicle can (might) see you. On
    the inside, that's less likely.

    What about vehicles turning right out of the side road, across your
    path? That's why this particular factor is not one for choosing
    between under/overtaking. I should probably have explained myself
    better in my first response given the attribution, because I place
    both situations together - both are right turners and each has either
    under or overtaking as most likely to conceal.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    I think peds are just as hard to spot when filtering on either side.

    I find peds easier to spot when I'm on the outside: when cycling in the
    gutter, a pedestrian might step off the pavement without a moment's
    notice, whereas if I'm in the middle of the road at least they'll have
    had to cross a lane of traffic before they're in a position to collide
    with me, and I get a reasonable chance to see them through
    windscreens/over the car roofs/etc

    YMMV, mine often does.

    -dan

    It's even easier to see them on the pavement, LOL!

  14. in message <[email hidden]>, Shumit

    (') said:

    Hi

    I have bought my first real bike (Trek 7.0) and took it out yesterday.
    Riding on the inside of some stationary traffic I almost got hit
    twice, within a mile of my home. Both times were car drivers getting
    bored and opting to turn left without indicating, etc. It made me
    think , do I have any rights if I get knocked off my bike and hurt
    myself. Particularly if I am overtaking on the inside?

    (i) Yes, you have the same rights any other road user has.
    (ii) Don't /ever/ overtake on the inside - rights are no use when you're
    dead.

    Seriously, get some training in road riding, and/or get and read a copy of
    Cyclecraft. You shouldn't /be/ close enough to the kerb to overtake on the
    inside. If there's queueing traffic, go up the right-hand side of the
    right-most left turning lane.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    -- mens vacua in medio vacuo --

  15. in message <[email hidden]>, Pete Biggs

    (') said:
    Doki said:

    "Shumit" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi

    I have bought my first real bike (Trek 7.0) and took it out
    yesterday. Riding on the inside of some stationary traffic I almost
    got hit twice, within a mile of my home. Both times were car drivers
    getting bored and opting to turn left without indicating, etc. It
    made me think , do I have any rights if I get knocked off my bike
    and hurt myself. Particularly if I am overtaking on the inside?

    Regardless of what you were doing, a driver is in the wrong if they turn
    or
    open a door without checking it is safe first. You would have the right
    to
    compensation if yourself or your bike was damaged.

    While all this is true, it's better to be alive than compensated. If you
    can't overtake on the outside, wait in the queue.

    Quoted message said:

    You have to assume doors could open on the right hand side as well.

    Absolutely. Never cycle fast close to stopped cars with people in them.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; in faecibus sapiens rheum propagabit

  16. Simon Brooke said:

    (i) Yes, you have the same rights any other road user has.
    (ii) Don't /ever/ overtake on the inside - rights are no use when
    you're dead.

    Seriously, get some training in road riding, and/or get and read a
    copy of Cyclecraft. You shouldn't /be/ close enough to the kerb to
    overtake on the inside. If there's queueing traffic, go up the
    right-hand side of the right-most left turning lane.

    I don't want to encourage anyone to overtake more often than they feel
    comfortable doing already (on either side), but the idea that overtaking on
    the left necessarily leads to death is a bit OTT!

    Cyclecraft does not say you should never do it, and there's often penty of
    room to, IME.

    You have to be realistic for your safety advice to be taken seriously. This
    is something Cyclecraft is good at. Not too many "nevers" and "alwayses" in
    there.

    ~PB

  17. Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Shumit

    (') said:

    Hi

    Quoted message said:

    I have bought my first real bike (Trek 7.0) and took it out yesterday.
    Riding on the inside of some stationary traffic I almost got hit
    twice, within a mile of my home. Both times were car drivers getting
    bored and opting to turn left without indicating, etc. It made me
    think , do I have any rights if I get knocked off my bike and hurt
    myself. Particularly if I am overtaking on the inside?

    (i) Yes, you have the same rights any other road user has.
    (ii) Don't /ever/ overtake on the inside - rights are no use when you're
    dead.

    Seriously, get some training in road riding, and/or get and read a copy of
    Cyclecraft. You shouldn't /be/ close enough to the kerb to overtake on the
    inside. If there's queueing traffic, go up the right-hand side of the
    right-most left turning lane.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke)http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    -- mens vacua in medio vacuo --

    I'm with Pete, I don't think it's always wrong to undertake.
    Sometimes it's the safer option, though I'd agree that most of the
    time overtaking is better. Regardless, it should always be done
    carefully (probably much more so than my recent extreme example), and
    there's nothing wrong with waiting in the queue either.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.