Cycling Training · Public discussion

53x12 intervals

Started by blkhotrod · · Last activity · 42 posts · 11,005 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Training
Published
29 November 2005
Last activity
17 December 2005
Original author
blkhotrod
Posts
42
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
11,005
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–42 of 42
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. blkhotrod said:

    Had a chance to ride with one of the local pros. He was telling me one of his off season workouts was 2 hours in a 53x12 gear at whatever cadence he could muster.

    Any thoughts?

    (no response needed from Ric Stern, already know this is stupid just like CTC/LA training....)


    go to www.sportsci.org and scroll down to the original research section. the first article is on the positive effects of low cadence/high force interval training on power. the full text is available to read. since my area of expertise is nutrition I'd be interested in what comments, criticisms the ex phys and coaches have on the study.

    JS

  2. jrstevens said:

    go to www.sportsci.org and scroll down to the original research section. the first article is on the positive effects of low cadence/high force interval training on power. the full text is available to read. since my area of expertise is nutrition I'd be interested in what comments, criticisms the ex phys and coaches have on the study.

    JS


    lists.topica.commessage.html

    lists.topica.commessage.html

    Those were Andy Coggan's replies to the same study on topica a few weeks ago.

    My only two points:
    1. It appeared that the control group had a slight fall in power output, which magnifies the improvement and sort of agrees with Andy's 1st statement above.
    2. I wasn't aware the Cateye was accurate at measuring power. (or even consistent, which is more important)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.