Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Ultegra - 105 - Tiagra

Started by Burak Ilter · · Last activity · 14 posts · 564 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
26 August 2004
Last activity
28 August 2004
Original author
Burak Ilter
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
564
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

    Hi, I am planning to buy a racing bike since I am planning to do my first
    triathlon next season. But I do not want to invest an awesome money to the
    bike. So here is my question: Should I use an Ultegra set or 105 or Tiagra?
    What do I lose if I use Tiagra, which is cheaper? What is the weight
    difference or am I missing the point completely?

    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Burak

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    *** Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! ***
    http://www.usenet.com
    Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Burak Ilter said:

    **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

    Hi, I am planning to buy a racing bike since I am planning to do my first
    triathlon next season. But I do not want to invest an awesome money to the
    bike. So here is my question: Should I use an Ultegra set or 105 or Tiagra?
    What do I lose if I use Tiagra, which is cheaper? What is the weight
    difference or am I missing the point completely?

    Well, other racers will look down their noses at you if you don't use at
    least 105 🙂.

    The minimal weight difference is, apparently, the main difference.

    Since you're using this as a tri-bike, will you configure the bike with
    aerobars? Will you use "barcon" shifters on the aerobars, or road-bike
    "brifteurs"?

    If there is one thing you deserve to be warned against, it's the odd
    bottom bracket choices on these three component sets:

    -Tiagra uses a square-taper BB, which sorta works okay for small people
    like me, and sorta doesn't work very well for very long for many large
    or powerful people.

    -105 currently uses the Shimano "Hollowtech" splined BB. For various
    reasons, this BB is ill-starred and on its way out. 2005 may be the last
    year that any Shimano group uses it. If possible, I would choose an
    ISIS-standard crank and BB (many makers sell road-bike cranks using ISIS
    splines).

    Ultegra used to use the Hollowtech BB, but as of 2005 is using the
    "Hollowtech II" pinch-bolt BB. this appears to be a vastly superior
    drive setup to the old Hollowtech stuff.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com
    Verus de parvis; verus de magnis.

  3. Ryan Cousineau <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Burak Ilter said:

    **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

    Hi, I am planning to buy a racing bike since I am planning to do my first
    triathlon next season. But I do not want to invest an awesome money to the
    bike. So here is my question: Should I use an Ultegra set or 105 or Tiagra?
    What do I lose if I use Tiagra, which is cheaper? What is the weight
    difference or am I missing the point completely?

    Well, other racers will look down their noses at you if you don't use at
    least 105 🙂.

    The minimal weight difference is, apparently, the main difference.

    Since you're using this as a tri-bike, will you configure the bike with
    aerobars? Will you use "barcon" shifters on the aerobars, or road-bike
    "brifteurs"?

    If there is one thing you deserve to be warned against, it's the odd
    bottom bracket choices on these three component sets:

    -Tiagra uses a square-taper BB, which sorta works okay for small people
    like me, and sorta doesn't work very well for very long for many large
    or powerful people.

    -105 currently uses the Shimano "Hollowtech" splined BB. For various
    reasons, this BB is ill-starred and on its way out. 2005 may be the last
    year that any Shimano group uses it. If possible, I would choose an
    ISIS-standard crank and BB (many makers sell road-bike cranks using ISIS
    splines).

    Ultegra used to use the Hollowtech BB, but as of 2005 is using the
    "Hollowtech II" pinch-bolt BB. this appears to be a vastly superior
    drive setup to the old Hollowtech stuff.

    I agree with everything above. The tiagra crank seems to be a bit
    bellow the others as far as design. I would avoid it. The rest of the
    group is ok. I personaly ride a mix of tiagra & 105 & it has worked
    great for 2 years. I'm very pleased. Keep in mind i only ride for fun
    & fitness. If i did much racing i might think different. The weight
    diff. in the 3 groups is not much.

  4. Should I use an Ultegra set or 105 or Tiagra?

    Quoted message said:

    What do I lose if I use Tiagra, which is cheaper? What is the weight
    difference or am I missing the point completely?

    The Tiagra hub is significantly worse than the 105, which is nearly as good
    as the Ultegra.

  5. **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

    Thanks for the answers, I will compare the part weights for the sets from
    the Shimano site and select according to the prices I get. And I will choose
    the crank with your tips' help.

    Since I am just planning to complete the race, I will not care what the
    others think. And for the same reason I am not planning to use aero-bars, in
    case I would give-up triathlon racing and bike just for fun and fitness.

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    *** Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! ***
    http://www.usenet.com
    Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

  6. "Burak Ilter" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:412d8020
    @post.usenet.com:

    Quoted message said:

    Hi, I am planning to buy a racing bike since I am planning to do my first
    triathlon next season. But I do not want to invest an awesome money to the
    bike. So here is my question: Should I use an Ultegra set or 105 or Tiagra?

    Are you buying the component group to install on a frame, or are you buying a
    complete bike? If you're buying components, I'd go with at least 105. The
    price difference over Tiagra isn't that much, but the components will
    function more smoothly. If you're buying a complete bike, remember that the
    price difference between levels also goes to upgraded forks and wheels.
    Those often have a bigger performance impact than the other components.

  7. Quoted message said:

    Hi, I am planning to buy a racing bike since I am planning to do my first
    triathlon next season. But I do not want to invest an awesome money to the
    bike. So here is my question: Should I use an Ultegra set or 105 or Tiagra?
    What do I lose if I use Tiagra, which is cheaper? What is the weight
    difference or am I missing the point completely?

    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Burak

    You are paying for more than just the weight difference with 105 vs.
    Tiagra. Tiagra is not designed as a racing group, and shares less of
    Shimano's high-end technology than the 105. IOW, Tiagra won't last as
    long and won't function as well while you have it.

    I don't have any personal experience with Tiagra or 105, but think you
    will be much happier if you get the 105 instead of the Tiagra. I
    don't think the difference between ultegra and 105 is very large.

  8. [email hidden] (Eric Lambi) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:


    You are paying for more than just the weight difference with 105 vs.
    Tiagra. Tiagra is not designed as a racing group, and shares less of
    Shimano's high-end technology than the 105. IOW, Tiagra won't last as
    long and won't function as well while you have it.

    Really, how so? Aside from aesthetics and weight, how, specifically is
    tiagra not as reliable, or will not perform as well as 105? Metal
    quality will result in components wearing out faster? Finish will
    prevent components from engaging properly? Since you don't have
    expereince with either, have you read any research that supports your
    claim? Have other riders specifically told you that tiagra wears out
    faster than 105?

    Andres

  9. "Burak Ilter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

    Thanks for the answers, I will compare the part weights for the sets from
    the Shimano site and select according to the prices I get. And I will choose
    the crank with your tips' help.

    Since I am just planning to complete the race, I will not care what the
    others think. And for the same reason I am not planning to use aero-bars, in
    case I would give-up triathlon racing and bike just for fun and fitness.

    Not sure where you are located but in the United States, you can
    probably buy a complete bike cheaper than the bike kit, i.e. house
    brand AL frame with Ultegra or 105 from Performancebike, Colorado
    Cyclist, .. Sell the frame or use it as a spare.

  10. Burak Ilter wrote in message <[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

    Hi, I am planning to buy a racing bike since I am planning to do my first
    triathlon next season. But I do not want to invest an awesome money to the
    bike. So here is my question: Should I use an Ultegra set or 105 or Tiagra?
    What do I lose if I use Tiagra, which is cheaper? What is the weight
    difference or am I missing the point completely?

    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Use the cheapest, other expenses are incurred for racing and training.
    Don't get caught out and only being able to recoup 1/4 of your spent money
    should you not enjoy this abysmal sport.

    Trevor


  11. Quoted message said:


    Not sure where you are located but in the United States, you can
    probably buy a complete bike cheaper than the bike kit, i.e. house
    brand AL frame with Ultegra or 105 from Performancebike, Colorado
    Cyclist, .. Sell the frame or use it as a spare.

    I just toss those [censored] frames into the dumpster.

  12. If you have to go buy the components to put on the frame (ie, you miss
    out on The Great OEM Give-Away), consider Centaur or even Veloce as well.

    Burak Ilter said:

    **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

    Hi, I am planning to buy a racing bike since I am planning to do my first
    triathlon next season. But I do not want to invest an awesome money to the
    bike. So here is my question: Should I use an Ultegra set or 105 or Tiagra?
    What do I lose if I use Tiagra, which is cheaper? What is the weight
    difference or am I missing the point completely?

    Thanks in advance for any help.

  13. RM-<< If you have to go buy the components to put on the frame (ie, you miss
    out on The Great OEM Give-Away), consider Centaur or even Veloce as well.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    Agree. If I were racing again(and I'm not), I would use a well fitting frameset
    fitted with a mix of Mirage(levers, ders), Veloce(brakes, cogset) and
    Centaur(hubs, BB, crank). Cuz if this Cat 4 crashed in the weekly Cat 4
    bloodbath, cheaper to repair/replace is better. The weight differences for this
    ..1 offa otn guy wouldn't mean squat.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  14. [email hidden] (Qui si parla Campagnolo ) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    RM-<< If you have to go buy the components to put on the frame (ie, you miss
    out on The Great OEM Give-Away), consider Centaur or even Veloce as well.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    Agree. If I were racing again(and I'm not), I would use a well fitting frameset
    fitted with a mix of Mirage(levers, ders), Veloce(brakes, cogset) and
    Centaur(hubs, BB, crank). Cuz if this Cat 4 crashed in the weekly Cat 4
    bloodbath, cheaper to repair/replace is better. The weight differences for this
    .1 offa otn guy wouldn't mean squat.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

    Those are very wise choices. If you race chances are you will crash.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.