In article <[email hidden]>,
Burak Ilter said:**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
Hi, I am planning to buy a racing bike since I am planning to do my first
triathlon next season. But I do not want to invest an awesome money to the
bike. So here is my question: Should I use an Ultegra set or 105 or Tiagra?
What do I lose if I use Tiagra, which is cheaper? What is the weight
difference or am I missing the point completely?
Well, other racers will look down their noses at you if you don't use at
least 105 🙂.
The minimal weight difference is, apparently, the main difference.
Since you're using this as a tri-bike, will you configure the bike with
aerobars? Will you use "barcon" shifters on the aerobars, or road-bike
"brifteurs"?
If there is one thing you deserve to be warned against, it's the odd
bottom bracket choices on these three component sets:
-Tiagra uses a square-taper BB, which sorta works okay for small people
like me, and sorta doesn't work very well for very long for many large
or powerful people.
-105 currently uses the Shimano "Hollowtech" splined BB. For various
reasons, this BB is ill-starred and on its way out. 2005 may be the last
year that any Shimano group uses it. If possible, I would choose an
ISIS-standard crank and BB (many makers sell road-bike cranks using ISIS
splines).
Ultegra used to use the Hollowtech BB, but as of 2005 is using the
"Hollowtech II" pinch-bolt BB. this appears to be a vastly superior
drive setup to the old Hollowtech stuff.
--
Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com
Verus de parvis; verus de magnis.