UK and Europe · Public discussion

nice bike

Started by Mark Hanley · · Last activity · 9 posts · 436 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
30 July 2004
Last activity
31 July 2004
Original author
Mark Hanley
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
436
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Have been ogling this bike for a while:

    http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2004/mountain/6066e.jsp#largerview

    I finally saw one for real last week and it is truly a beautiful bike. BUT I
    can't find anything out about it. No rider comments, reviews - nothing. If
    you go onto the Trek website, there's no link to the page it's on; I had to
    find it through google.

    Why is this bike not more well known? Why are Trek hiding it?

    What do you lot think of the look and spec?

    Mark.

  2. "Mark Hanley" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2004/mountain/6066e.jsp#largerview

    I finally saw one for real last week and it is truly a beautiful bike. BUT


    I

    Quoted message said:

    can't find anything out about it. No rider comments, reviews - nothing. If
    you go onto the Trek website, there's no link to the page it's on; I had


    to

    Quoted message said:

    find it through google.

    Why is this bike not more well known? Why are Trek hiding it?

    What do you lot think of the look and spec?

    TBH it looks a bit of a mish-mash to me. High speed tyres with front
    suspension, albeit with lock-out. Hayes discs are great but why suffer the
    weight penalty on a high speed (by the look) road bike when rim brakes are
    more than adequate? And a low front end which if fitted with drops would
    offer more hand positions.
    I'm not really sure what it's about.
    Well, you did ask ;-)

    Rgds,
    Pete

  3. Mark Hanley said:

    Have been ogling this bike for a while:

    http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2004/mountain/6066e.jsp#largerview

    I finally saw one for real last week and it is truly a beautiful
    bike. BUT I can't find anything out about it. No rider comments,
    reviews - nothing. If you go onto the Trek website, there's no link
    to the page it's on; I had to find it through google.

    Why is this bike not more well known? Why are Trek hiding it?

    What do you lot think of the look and spec?

    Mark.

    Wow. That's one ugly bike.

  4. in message <[email hidden]>, Mark Hanley

    (') said:

    Have been ogling this bike for a while:

    http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2004/mountain/6066e.jsp#largerview

    I finally saw one for real last week and it is truly a beautiful bike.
    BUT I can't find anything out about it. No rider comments, reviews -
    nothing. If you go onto the Trek website, there's no link to the page
    it's on; I had to find it through google.

    Quality urban bike with mountain type gears; see also Cannondale Bad Boy
    Ultra and 1FG. The 1FG is interesting as a manufactured-as-such single
    speed (one f***ing gear). Designed for relatively short sprints rather
    than long, steady rides. Target market is (I think) young-and-trendy
    urbanites. Based on courier's bikes, although I'd be surprised if many
    working couriers spent this sort of money on a bike. The suspension on
    the Cannondales is short-travel road suspension; I suspect the Trek
    will be too (although it is interesting that it has lockout).

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; Women are from Venus. Men are from Mars. Lusers are from Uranus.

  5. Mark Hanley said:

    What do you lot think of the look and spec?

    Er... the wheels look too small.

    To me it looks like a bike that highlights the deficiencies of the
    hybrid concept, ie with the mix-and-match components it ends up being
    neither one thing nor the other.

    OK, it wouldn't really be a /bad/ road bike but I'd rather spend the
    same money on a proper road bike or a proper MTB.

    d.

  6. "davek" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mark Hanley said:

    What do you lot think of the look and spec?

    Er... the wheels look too small.

    To me it looks like a bike that highlights the deficiencies of the
    hybrid concept, ie with the mix-and-match components it ends up being
    neither one thing nor the other.

    OK, it wouldn't really be a /bad/ road bike but I'd rather spend the
    same money on a proper road bike or a proper MTB.

    d.

    LOL - I suppose beauty IS in the eye of the beholder! Thanks guys - I need
    such constructive comments to stop me going out and blowing a not
    inconsiderable amount of money on one of these things.

  7. Mark Hanley said:

    Have been ogling this bike for a while:

    http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2004/mountain/6066e.jsp#largerview

    I finally saw one for real last week and it is truly a beautiful
    bike. BUT I can't find anything out about it. No rider comments,
    reviews - nothing. If you go onto the Trek website, there's no link
    to the page it's on; I had to find it through google.

    Why is this bike not more well known? Why are Trek hiding it?

    What do you lot think of the look and spec?

    Mark.

    I dunno much about bikes, but it looks like the result of what happens when
    you let a committee design a bike. Plus it's really ugly.

    --

    Burning_Ranger

    To email: [email hidden]

  8. davek typed:

    Quoted message said:
    Mark Hanley said:

    What do you lot think of the look and spec?

    Er... the wheels look too small.

    To me it looks like a bike that highlights the deficiencies of the
    hybrid concept, ie with the mix-and-match components it ends up being
    neither one thing nor the other.

    OK, it wouldn't really be a /bad/ road bike but I'd rather spend the
    same money on a proper road bike or a proper MTB.

    Or even half the money on one of each .. 😉

    --
    Paul ...

    (8(|) ... Homer Rocks

  9. Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Mark Hanley

    (') said:

    Have been ogling this bike for a while:

    http://www.trekbikes.com/bikes/2004/mountain/6066e.jsp#largerview

    I finally saw one for real last week and it is truly a beautiful bike.
    BUT I can't find anything out about it. No rider comments, reviews -
    nothing. If you go onto the Trek website, there's no link to the page
    it's on; I had to find it through google.

    Quality urban bike with mountain type gears; see also Cannondale Bad Boy
    Ultra and 1FG. The 1FG is interesting as a manufactured-as-such single
    speed (one f***ing gear). Designed for relatively short sprints rather
    than long, steady rides. Target market is (I think) young-and-trendy
    urbanites. Based on courier's bikes, although I'd be surprised if many
    working couriers spent this sort of money on a bike. The suspension on
    the Cannondales is short-travel road suspension; I suspect the Trek
    will be too (although it is interesting that it has lockout).

    I agree it appears to be a copy of the Bad Boy, of which I possess the
    original model (slightly heavier frame, no suspension) and would not
    do without. For my commute in and out of Cambridge, including short
    cut through a couple of fields, it really does the business: plenty
    fast enough for me on the roads and able to carry that speed onto the
    bridlepaths. It has also been used for many longer rides at weekends.
    And the matt black paint is nicely anonymous in the Cambridge cycle
    racks....

    I was told it was supposed to be a "courier culture bike" and that it
    was intended for owners to buy a second set of wheels, equipped for
    off-road, the idea being that you commuted to work on it in the week
    on tarmac and rode on dirt at the weekends.

    It is not a pretty bike, but it does what I want it to very well.

    Clear skies
    Sarennah

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.