Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Trek 7200 vs. 7300

Started by Steve · · Last activity · 9 posts · 1,945 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
25 July 2004
Last activity
26 July 2004
Original author
Steve
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,945
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My wife and I have decided to get our first bicycles in 10 years. I have
    previous road bike experience and my wife used to have a mountain bike.
    Since we want to remain sitting upright and relaxed and since our bikes will
    mainly be used in the "burbs" on pavement and perhaps at most on a highly
    groomed trail a hybrid seems an obvious choice. The bikes will be used for
    enjoyment and light exercise more than any formal training goal.

    For price considerations we are limiting our selection to the Trek
    7300/7200/7100 series of bikes, their hybrids. It seems everywhere in our
    area the 2004 models are sold out and the 2005 are just starting to arrive
    so this purchase will be made in the next 2-4 weeks as the appropriate 2005
    model arrives. Right now mens frames are only starting to trickle in but our
    LBS says for sure within the next 3-4 weeks they should have any option
    available. Based on the 7100 series there have been no changes between
    2004/05 accept for paint. Details of the 7200/7300 2004/05 differences are
    as of yet unavailable.

    This is where I get lost: I am trying to decide between the 7100/200/300
    series. I feel fine about the price of the 7200 so because I do believe
    paying more you get better components and features I will rule out the 7100.
    However the price of getting two 7300's is getting a bit steep for the use
    of these bikes, but I am willing to do so if it will increase my enjoyment
    of the bicycle. I have asked folks at the LBS want the differences are and
    they say "a nicer handle bar, better derailleur etc." None of which means
    anything to me from a practicle standpoint. How is it nicer? Will I notice?
    What makes one derailleur better than another? Weight? Reliablity?

    Assuming the 2004 stats remain the same here are the areas of difference in
    the 7300 vs. 7200 series. Can you please help me get a concrete idea of
    "what I am getting" that is better and why if I buy a 7300! Thanks!!!

    Price: 7300 $470 / 7200 $390

    Wheels: 7300 Alloy F, Shimano C201 R hub; ACE19 rims / 7200 Alloy F, Shimano
    RM40 R hub, Matrix 750 rims

    Tires: 7300 Bontrager Invert HC, Kevlar belt, 700x35c / 7200 Bontrager
    Invert Select, 700x35c

    Handlebars: 7300 Bontrager Bar-Keeper / 7200 55mm rise

    Shifters: 7300 SRAM ESP Pro / 7200 SRAM MRX Plus

    Front Derailleur: 7300 Shimano T301 / 7200 Shimano C102

    Rear Derailleur: 7300 SRAM X.7 / 7200 Shimano Alivio

    Crankset: 7300 Bontrager Sport 48/38/28 / 7200 Shimano C203 48/38/28

    THOSE ARE THE ONLY DIFFERENCES, that I am aware of besides paint. How will
    these differences be seen or felt over time? Thanks again!

    Dave

  2. You get the 7300 and she gets the 7100.

  3. actually she is saying she wants the 7200, and i kinda want the 7300. i am
    wondering if i just shouldn't get us both the 7300 so we can have the same
    set of equipment which will make me more familar in case i want to do some
    at home adjustment. still wish i could "understand" the equipment
    differences though...

    "Belicians" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You get the 7300 and she gets the 7100.

  4. "Steve" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:h7WMc.158427$a24.127942@attbi_s03...

    First, look at the 7300fx instead. It's cheaper and better because you're
    not wasting your money on a [censored] suspension fork that offers no benefit on
    pavement, and on other features like an adjustable stem and a saddle with a
    built-in blinkie and handlebars with accessory clips that were invented by
    the marketing department.

    Second... actually, there is no second. The 7300fx is faster, lighter,
    cheaper, and has better parts than the 7300.

    RichC

  5. On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:03:57 GMT, "Steve" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Can you please help me get a concrete idea of
    "what I am getting" that is better and why if I buy a 7300! Thanks!!!

    Quoted message said:

    Price: 7300 $470 / 7200 $390

    Quoted message said:

    Wheels: 7300 Alloy F, Shimano C201 R hub; ACE19 rims / 7200 Alloy F, Shimano
    RM40 R hub, Matrix 750 rims

    I think the Matrix rims might be a bit heavier and stronger, but the
    ACE19 rims should be plenty strong enough for the use you describe.

    Quoted message said:

    Tires: 7300 Bontrager Invert HC, Kevlar belt, 700x35c / 7200 Bontrager
    Invert Select, 700x35c

    The kevlar belt may reduce flats, but it adds rolling resistance. If
    you're not in a hurry (keeping up with anyone?) it shouldn't matter.
    Keep in mind tires are easy to change. The dealer may even be willing
    to change them out when the bikes are new.

    Quoted message said:

    Handlebars: 7300 Bontrager Bar-Keeper / 7200 55mm rise

    The Bar-Keeper lets you add compatible accessories (computer, lights)
    with a "click". Not a big deal in my opinion; you may prefer
    accessories that aren't compatible anyway.

    Quoted message said:

    Shifters: 7300 SRAM ESP Pro / 7200 SRAM MRX Plus

    I don't know of any functional difference here; is the grip texture or
    shifting action on either one more pleasant to you?

    Quoted message said:

    Front Derailleur: 7300 Shimano T301 / 7200 Shimano C102
    Rear Derailleur: 7300 SRAM X.7 / 7200 Shimano Alivio

    The 7300 does have "nicer" derailleurs, but you won't notice it. In my
    experience adjustment and shift cable friction have more to do with
    good or bad shifting than the difference between these derailleurs.

    Quoted message said:

    Crankset: 7300 Bontrager Sport 48/38/28 / 7200 Shimano C203 48/38/28

    No noticeable difference in my opinion.

    Quoted message said:

    THOSE ARE THE ONLY DIFFERENCES, that I am aware of besides paint.

    Paint might be the most important difference. Seriously! ;-) You will
    enjoy riding more if you like the way your new bike looks.

    Quoted message said:

    How will
    these differences be seen or felt over time? Thanks again!

    Dave

    If the colors were good, I'd get the nicer bikes. I have more fun
    riding a nice bike.

  6. dianne_1234 said:


    Quoted message said:

    Tires: 7300 Bontrager Invert HC, Kevlar belt, 700x35c / 7200 Bontrager
    Invert Select, 700x35c

    The kevlar belt may reduce flats, but it adds rolling resistance. If
    you're not in a hurry (keeping up with anyone?) it shouldn't matter.

    Rolling resistance difference on a hybrid with 35mm tyres? ..D'oh? OK!

  7. boudreaux said:
    dianne_1234 said:

    The kevlar belt may reduce flats, but it adds rolling resistance. If
    you're not in a hurry (keeping up with anyone?) it shouldn't matter.

    Quoted message said:

    Rolling resistance difference on a hybrid with 35mm tres? ..D'oh? OK!

    Sure, rolling resistance on hybrids with 35mm tires.

    At lower speeds like on hybrids, aero drag is pretty low. So rolling
    resistance becomes a significant factor slowing you down. About equal
    with aerodynamics.

    From http://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/aero/formulas.htm:

    "At approximately 12 km/h rolling and air resistance have equivalent
    magnitude. At higher velocities air resistance dominates quite
    strongly."

    So I consider rolling resistance on my bikes, and especially on my
    hybrid.

  8. dianne_1234 said:

    On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:23:48 +1000, boudreaux

    Quoted message said:
    dianne_1234 said:

    The kevlar belt may reduce flats, but it adds rolling resistance. If
    you're not in a hurry (keeping up with anyone?) it shouldn't matter.

    Quoted message said:

    Rolling resistance difference on a hybrid with 35mm tres? ..D'oh? OK!

    Sure, rolling resistance on hybrids with 35mm tires.

    At lower speeds like on hybrids, aero drag is pretty low. So rolling
    resistance becomes a significant factor slowing you down. About equal
    with aerodynamics.

    From http://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/aero/formulas.htm:

    "At approximately 12 km/h rolling and air resistance have equivalent
    magnitude. At higher velocities air resistance dominates quite
    strongly."

    So I consider rolling resistance on my bikes, and especially on my
    hybrid.


    Sure. Now tell me just how much a kevlar belt incerases rolling resistance in 35mm hybrid or any other tyre.

  9. First a few questions. How many miles a year do you honestly think you'll
    pedal these bikes? Are we talking less than 500 a year? 1000? How many years
    do you expect to have these bikes? Is this strictly path riding or will you
    be on city streets as well?

    "Steve" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:h7WMc.158427$a24.127942@attbi_s03...

    Quoted message said:

    My wife and I have decided to get our first bicycles in 10 years. I have
    previous road bike experience and my wife used to have a mountain bike.
    Since we want to remain sitting upright and relaxed and since our bikes


    will

    Quoted message said:

    mainly be used in the "burbs" on pavement and perhaps at most on a highly
    groomed trail a hybrid seems an obvious choice. The bikes will be used for
    enjoyment and light exercise more than any formal training goal.

    For price considerations we are limiting our selection to the Trek
    7300/7200/7100 series of bikes, their hybrids. It seems everywhere in our
    area the 2004 models are sold out and the 2005 are just starting to arrive
    so this purchase will be made in the next 2-4 weeks as the appropriate


    2005

    Quoted message said:

    model arrives. Right now mens frames are only starting to trickle in but


    our

    Quoted message said:

    LBS says for sure within the next 3-4 weeks they should have any option
    available. Based on the 7100 series there have been no changes between
    2004/05 accept for paint. Details of the 7200/7300 2004/05 differences are
    as of yet unavailable.

    This is where I get lost: I am trying to decide between the 7100/200/300
    series. I feel fine about the price of the 7200 so because I do believe
    paying more you get better components and features I will rule out the


    7100.

    Quoted message said:

    However the price of getting two 7300's is getting a bit steep for the use
    of these bikes, but I am willing to do so if it will increase my enjoyment
    of the bicycle. I have asked folks at the LBS want the differences are and
    they say "a nicer handle bar, better derailleur etc." None of which means
    anything to me from a practicle standpoint. How is it nicer? Will I


    notice?

    Quoted message said:

    What makes one derailleur better than another? Weight? Reliablity?

    Assuming the 2004 stats remain the same here are the areas of difference


    in

    Quoted message said:

    the 7300 vs. 7200 series. Can you please help me get a concrete idea of
    "what I am getting" that is better and why if I buy a 7300! Thanks!!!

    Price: 7300 $470 / 7200 $390

    Wheels: 7300 Alloy F, Shimano C201 R hub; ACE19 rims / 7200 Alloy F,


    Shimano

    Quoted message said:

    RM40 R hub, Matrix 750 rims

    Tires: 7300 Bontrager Invert HC, Kevlar belt, 700x35c / 7200 Bontrager
    Invert Select, 700x35c

    Handlebars: 7300 Bontrager Bar-Keeper / 7200 55mm rise

    Shifters: 7300 SRAM ESP Pro / 7200 SRAM MRX Plus

    Front Derailleur: 7300 Shimano T301 / 7200 Shimano C102

    Rear Derailleur: 7300 SRAM X.7 / 7200 Shimano Alivio

    Crankset: 7300 Bontrager Sport 48/38/28 / 7200 Shimano C203 48/38/28

    THOSE ARE THE ONLY DIFFERENCES, that I am aware of besides paint. How will
    these differences be seen or felt over time? Thanks again!

    Dave

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.