Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

A Torque Experiment

Started by John Everett · · Last activity · 7 posts · 323 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
8 July 2004
Last activity
9 July 2004
Original author
John Everett
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
323
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. As I posted yesterday I had to install a new BB in my touring bike.
    I've posted many times before about using a torque wrench to properly
    afix crank arms. Instead of repeating here's a url to an old posting
    about my technique: http://tinyurl.com/2cyvh

    Anyway, I got to thinking about the proper way to use the wrench. It
    occurred to me (after years of doing this) that applying the torque
    against the arm being afixed involves some side loads in the arm/
    taper interface. As an experiment I torqued the arms the way I usually
    do, then retorqued against resistance applied to the opposite arm.
    Guess what, the bolt turned a bit before again reaching 30 ft.lbs.

    I'm not sure what this all means, but I'll be using this technique
    from now on. Of course this all means nothing to the "calibrated
    forearm" crowd. ;-)

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net http://home.earthlink.net/~jeverett3

  2. John Everett said:

    As I posted yesterday I had to install a new BB in my touring bike.
    I've posted many times before about using a torque wrench to properly
    afix crank arms. Instead of repeating here's a url to an old posting
    about my technique: http://tinyurl.com/2cyvh

    Anyway, I got to thinking about the proper way to use the wrench. It
    occurred to me (after years of doing this) that applying the torque
    against the arm being afixed involves some side loads in the arm/
    taper interface. As an experiment I torqued the arms the way I usually
    do, then retorqued against resistance applied to the opposite arm.
    Guess what, the bolt turned a bit before again reaching 30 ft.lbs.

    I'm not sure what this all means, but I'll be using this technique
    from now on. Of course this all means nothing to the "calibrated
    forearm" crowd. ;-)

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net http://home.earthlink.net/~jeverett3


    any time you "retorque" a fastener, it will get tighter.
    Once you've set the torque wrench to the final torque, don't
    "retorque"; all you are doing is making it tighter than
    specs. If you don't believe me, go out to your car and
    torque a lug nut to specs. Then reposition the torque
    wrench so that you can crank it down again. You'll see the
    torque wrench handle move before it clicks, as often as not,
    indicating that you've moved (tightened) the lug nut. This
    effect doesn't occur EVERY time you "retorque" but it WILL
    occur on some fasteners.

    dave

  3. John Everett said:

    As an experiment I torqued the arms the way I usually
    do, then retorqued against resistance applied to the opposite arm.
    Guess what, the bolt turned a bit before again reaching 30 ft.lbs.

    It's likely that it would have done so with a retorque done
    identically to the first. If you have a junker bike around, try it
    and see.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Surrealism is a pectinated ranzel.

  4. Bay Area Dave said:

    any time you "retorque" a fastener, it will get tighter.
    Once you've set the torque wrench to the final torque, don't
    "retorque"; all you are doing is making it tighter than
    specs. If you don't believe me, go out to your car and
    torque a lug nut to specs. Then reposition the torque
    wrench so that you can crank it down again. You'll see the
    torque wrench handle move before it clicks, as often as not,
    indicating that you've moved (tightened) the lug nut. This
    effect doesn't occur EVERY time you "retorque" but it WILL
    occur on some fasteners.

    If the fastener is driving something onto a tapered hub, this is a
    reasonably accurate observation. For fasteners in normal
    applications, a retorque should produce little or no motion. As has
    been pointed out multiple times, however, cranks tend to "creep up"
    the taper, causing the fastener to lose apparent tension. Mostly,
    this is reported with regard to bolts seeming loose after just one or
    two rides follwoing installation, but in my experience, the amount of
    creep that accurs within a few seconds of removal of the wrench can be
    enough to make the fastener appear to have been incorrectly torqued by
    a significant margin.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Surrealism is a pectinated ranzel.

  5. Quoted message said:

    applications, a retorque should produce little or no motion. As has
    been pointed out multiple times, however, cranks tend to "creep up"
    the taper, causing the fastener to lose apparent tension. Mostly,
    this is reported with regard to bolts seeming loose after just one or
    two rides follwoing installation, but in my experience, the amount of
    creep that accurs within a few seconds of removal of the wrench can be
    enough to make the fastener appear to have been incorrectly torqued by
    a significant margin.

    Don't you have to at least load the cranks to have creep occur?

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  6. Quoted message said:

    applications, a retorque should produce little or no motion. As has
    been pointed out multiple times, however, cranks tend to "creep up"
    the taper, causing the fastener to lose apparent tension. Mostly,
    this is reported with regard to bolts seeming loose after just one or
    two rides follwoing installation, but in my experience, the amount of
    creep that accurs within a few seconds of removal of the wrench can be
    enough to make the fastener appear to have been incorrectly torqued by
    a significant margin.

    Don't you have to at least load the cranks to have creep occur?

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  7. ZeeExSixAre said:
    Quoted message said:

    applications, a retorque should produce little or no motion. As has
    been pointed out multiple times, however, cranks tend to "creep up"
    the taper, causing the fastener to lose apparent tension. Mostly,
    this is reported with regard to bolts seeming loose after just one or
    two rides follwoing installation, but in my experience, the amount of
    creep that accurs within a few seconds of removal of the wrench can be
    enough to make the fastener appear to have been incorrectly torqued by
    a significant margin.

    Don't you have to at least load the cranks to have creep occur?

    Not in my experience, though loading them will greatly increase the
    creep. I intentionally retorqued the same left crank six times,
    waiting 15 minutes between each attempt, and got a surprising amount
    of rotation each time. This was with a Snap-On click-type wrench that
    was left at the same adjustment point throughout the test.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Surrealism is a pectinated ranzel.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.