"Richard Bullock" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
The local paper in Wilmslow, Cheshire reported on a cycle track which was in planning - which would be a designated "local cycle route" on the Sustrans scheme. The planning permission was overturned because it was too dangerous - the reason? A set of 80 or so steps was to form an integral part of the cycle route where the cycle track came up against a 1:12 incline which rises a total of 23 metres.
Brilliant! Do these people know what a bike is? Is it a cycle track specifically for trials riders?
"Richard Bullock" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
The local paper in Wilmslow, Cheshire reported on a cycle track which was in planning - which would be a designated "local cycle route" on the Sustrans scheme. The planning permission was overturned because it was too dangerous - the reason? A set of 80 or so steps was to form an integral part of the cycle route where the cycle track came up against a 1:12 incline which rises a total of 23 metres.
Brilliant! Do these people know what a bike is? Is it a cycle track specifically for trials riders?
Prabably had a surplus of Cyclist Dismount signs they were hoping to use up.
Prabably had a surplus of Cyclist Dismount signs they were hoping to use up.
Tee-hee!
I have been using a short stretch of Sustrans path to avoid Nastiness. I'm going to have to stop usig it; it was marginal on the tourer but is bloody unpleasant on the 'bent. Why? Because Sustrans, in their infinite wisdom, have chosen to spread loose gravel over the tarmac surface. Somebody really out to point out to them that the "trans" part means "transport", which means that you can't assume balloon-tyred MTBs will be the only bikes.
I have been using a short stretch of Sustrans path to avoid Nastiness.
I'm
Quoted message said:
going to have to stop usig it; it was marginal on the tourer but is bloody unpleasant on the 'bent. Why? Because Sustrans, in their infinite
wisdom,
Quoted message said:
have chosen to spread loose gravel over the tarmac surface. Somebody
really
Quoted message said:
out to point out to them that the "trans" part means "transport", which means that you can't assume balloon-tyred MTBs will be the only bikes.
I took an old MTB along to do short sections of the Trans-Pennine Trail - I've done the bit from Spike Island, Widnes to somewhere East of Stockport - and the quality varies enormously. The section along the former railway between Altrincham and Lymm is actually quite good (although has annoying gates where it meets a couple of minor roads) - and certain bits in Warrington are ok - the section past Fiddlers Ferry power station was almost impassable on foot let alone on a bike - it was so overgrown. The bit from the end of the end of the railway to the east of Stockport is generally quite [censored] - the surfacing is very poor - I certainly wouldn't recommend doing it on anything with smaller wheels than my MTB - and one particular section East of Stockport - I wouldn't recommend doing it on a bike at all - I nearly broke a wheel. I hope that bit has been properly surfaced now/ or an alternative route found - rather than just saying that large loose rocks are an adequate surface.
Prabably had a surplus of Cyclist Dismount signs they were hoping to use up.
William. I think they gave a job lot to British Waterways too - on a whim I rode home up the tow path (Regent's Canal, Hertford Union Canal, river Lea) yesterday and there were a profusion of signs forbidding the riding of bicycles under bridges.
"Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I have been using a short stretch of Sustrans path to avoid Nastiness. I'm going to have to stop usig it; it was marginal on the tourer but is bloody unpleasant on the 'bent. Why? Because Sustrans, in their infinite wisdom, have chosen to spread loose gravel over the tarmac surface. Somebody really out to point out to them that the "trans" part means "transport", which means that you can't assume balloon-tyred MTBs will be the only bikes.
But that would involve them having some knowledge of what they were doing. Interested to see John Grimshaw in a letter to AtoB saying no-one in Sustrans "has any knowledge that trikes cannot be used on bridleways". So no one is Sustrans has heard of that fundamental piece of rights of way for cyclists legislation, The Countryside Act 1968, which only allows bicycles and not tricycles or unicycles on bridleways then.
Dave Larrington <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
Tony Raven said:
Prabably had a surplus of Cyclist Dismount signs they were hoping to use up.
William. I think they gave a job lot to British Waterways too - on a whim I rode home up the tow path (Regent's Canal, Hertford Union Canal, river Lea) yesterday and there were a profusion of signs forbidding the riding of bicycles under bridges.
Plenty of those up here too. I'll never understand why they build a cycleway and then put "Cyclists Dismount" signs every time it meets some kind of obstruction.
On Tue, 11 May 2004 17:21:03 +0000 (UTC) someone who may be Iain Jones <[email hidden]> wrote this:-
Quoted message said:
Plenty of those up here too. I'll never understand why they build a cycleway and then put "Cyclists Dismount" signs every time it meets some kind of obstruction.
Officials are either stupid or intimidated.
They would of course never dream of putting up a "Motorists get out and push sign", when they start doing so it is time for cyclists to consider the request to dismount.
The double standards of officials was also demonstrated by the foot & mouth "crisis". Cycle paths were closed, but not roads. A risk assessment shows that roads are more likely to spread the disease, but cyclists can be picked on.
-- David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government prevents me using the RIP Act 2000.
I'll never understand why they build a cycleway and then put "Cyclists Dismount" signs every time it meets some kind of obstruction.
It's because (a) the cycleway is for the convenience of cagers not cyclists and (b) it is so self-evidently dangerous that even the council, in their infinite cluelessness, can't fail to recognise it. The possibility of option (c), doing the job properly, of course never occurs to them.
