Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

A Torque Experiment

Started by John Everett · · Last activity · 6 posts · 822 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
8 July 2004
Last activity
9 July 2004
Original author
John Everett
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
822
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. As I posted yesterday I had to install a new BB in my touring bike.
    I've posted many times before about using a torque wrench to properly
    afix crank arms. Instead of repeating here's a url to an old posting
    about my technique: tinyurl.com2cyvh

    Anyway, I got to thinking about the proper way to use the
    wrench. It occurred to me (after years of doing this)
    that applying the torque against the arm being afixed
    involves some side loads in the arm/ taper interface. As
    an experiment I torqued the arms the way I usually do,
    then retorqued against resistance applied to the opposite
    arm. Guess what, the bolt turned a bit before again
    reaching 30 ft.lbs.

    I'm not sure what this all means, but I'll be using this
    technique from now on. Of course this all means nothing to
    the "calibrated forearm" crowd. ;-)

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net
    home.earthlink.net~jeverett3

  2. John Everett said:

    As I posted yesterday I had to install a new BB in my
    touring bike. I've posted many times before about using a
    torque wrench to properly afix crank arms. Instead of
    repeating here's a url to an old posting about my
    technique: tinyurl.com2cyvh

    Anyway, I got to thinking about the proper way to use the
    wrench. It occurred to me (after years of doing this)
    that applying the torque against the arm being afixed
    involves some side loads in the arm/ taper interface. As
    an experiment I torqued the arms the way I usually do,
    then retorqued against resistance applied to the opposite
    arm. Guess what, the bolt turned a bit before again
    reaching 30 ft.lbs.

    I'm not sure what this all means, but I'll be using this
    technique from now on. Of course this all means nothing to
    the "calibrated forearm" crowd. ;-)

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net
    home.earthlink.net~jeverett3


    any time you "retorque" a fastener, it will get tighter.
    Once you've set the torque wrench to the final torque, don't
    "retorque"; all you are doing is making it tighter than
    specs. If you don't believe me, go out to your car and
    torque a lug nut to specs. Then reposition the torque wrench
    so that you can crank it down again. You'll see the torque
    wrench handle move before it clicks, as often as not,
    indicating that you've moved (tightened) the lug nut. This
    effect doesn't occur EVERY time you "retorque" but it WILL
    occur on some fasteners.

    dave

  3. John Everett said:

    As an experiment I torqued the arms the way I usually do,
    then retorqued against resistance applied to the opposite
    arm. Guess what, the bolt turned a bit before again
    reaching 30 ft.lbs.

    It's likely that it would have done so with a retorque done
    identically to the first. If you have a junker bike around,
    try it and see.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to
    reply via email. Surrealism is a pectinated ranzel.

  4. Bay Area Dave said:

    any time you "retorque" a fastener, it will get tighter.
    Once you've set the torque wrench to the final torque,
    don't "retorque"; all you are doing is making it tighter
    than specs. If you don't believe me, go out to your car and
    torque a lug nut to specs. Then reposition the torque
    wrench so that you can crank it down again. You'll see the
    torque wrench handle move before it clicks, as often as
    not, indicating that you've moved (tightened) the lug nut.
    This effect doesn't occur EVERY time you "retorque" but it
    WILL occur on some fasteners.

    If the fastener is driving something onto a tapered hub,
    this is a reasonably accurate observation. For fasteners in
    normal applications, a retorque should produce little or no
    motion. As has been pointed out multiple times, however,
    cranks tend to "creep up" the taper, causing the fastener to
    lose apparent tension. Mostly, this is reported with regard
    to bolts seeming loose after just one or two rides follwoing
    installation, but in my experience, the amount of creep that
    accurs within a few seconds of removal of the wrench can be
    enough to make the fastener appear to have been incorrectly
    torqued by a significant margin.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to
    reply via email. Surrealism is a pectinated ranzel.

  5. Quoted message said:

    applications, a retorque should produce little or no
    motion. As has been pointed out multiple times, however,
    cranks tend to "creep up" the taper, causing the fastener
    to lose apparent tension. Mostly, this is reported with
    regard to bolts seeming loose after just one or two rides
    follwoing installation, but in my experience, the amount
    of creep that accurs within a few seconds of removal of
    the wrench can be enough to make the fastener appear to
    have been incorrectly torqued by a significant margin.

    Don't you have to at least load the cranks to have
    creep occur?

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  6. ZeeExSixAre said:
    Quoted message said:

    applications, a retorque should produce little or no
    motion. As has been pointed out multiple times, however,
    cranks tend to "creep up" the taper, causing the fastener
    to lose apparent tension. Mostly, this is reported with
    regard to bolts seeming loose after just one or two rides
    follwoing installation, but in my experience, the amount
    of creep that accurs within a few seconds of removal of
    the wrench can be enough to make the fastener appear to
    have been incorrectly torqued by a significant margin.

    Don't you have to at least load the cranks to have
    creep occur?

    Not in my experience, though loading them will greatly
    increase the creep. I intentionally retorqued the same left
    crank six times, waiting 15 minutes between each attempt,
    and got a surprising amount of rotation each time. This was
    with a Snap-On click-type wrench that was left at the same
    adjustment point throughout the test.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to
    reply via email. Surrealism is a pectinated ranzel.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.