Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Slightly OT: Sunglasses. M-frames vs Half Jackets

Started by John Rogerson · · Last activity · 5 posts · 748 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
30 June 2004
Last activity
1 July 2004
Original author
John Rogerson
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
748
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

    ------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C45EB1.CF4F7590 Content-Type:
    text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding:
    quoted-printable

    I'm lucky enough to have come into a little bit of money to
    waste as I = want. I'm quite happy with my bikes so no need
    to change them but it = does mean that I can fork out for
    some peripheral gear that I wouldn't = normally spend much
    money on. A pair of Oakleys is on the list.

    I know the M frames are meant to be the ultimate sports
    sunnies but they = really don't suit me. I want the
    changeable lens facility for different = light conditions.

    How do the Half Jackets measure up for cycle use? I also
    do a fair bit = of running and they would be used for
    that as well.

    Opinions appreciated.

    Cheers ------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C45EB1.CF4F7590 Content-
    Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-
    Encoding: quoted-printable

    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0
    Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-
    Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META
    content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
    <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm lucky enough to have
    come into a = little bit of=20 money to waste as I
    want. I'm quite happy with my bikes so no need
    = to=20 change them but it does mean that I can fork
    out for some peripheral = gear that I=20 wouldn't
    normally spend much money on. A pair of Oakleys
    is on the =

    list.</FONT></DIV>
    <DV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DVI><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I know the M frames are
    meant to be the = ultimate=20 sports sunnies but they
    really don't suit me. I want the = changeable
    lens=20 facility for different light
    conditions.</FONT></DIV>
    <DVII><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DVIII><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>How do the Half Jackets
    measure up for = cycle use?=20 I also do a fair
    bit of running and they would be used for that as =

    well.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIX><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DX><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Opinions
    appreciated.</FONT></DIV>
    <DXI><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
    <DXII><FONT face=3DArial
    size=3D2>Cheers</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

    ------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C45EB1.CF4F7590--

  2. John Rogerson said:

    I'm lucky enough to have come into a little bit of money to
    waste as I want. I'm quite happy with my bikes so no need
    to change them but it does mean that I can fork out for
    some peripheral gear that I wouldn't normally spend much
    money on. A pair of Oakleys is on the list.

    I know the M frames are meant to be the ultimate sports
    sunnies but they really don't suit me. I want the
    changeable lens facility for different light conditions.

    You can change the lenses in M frames. Oakley even makes a
    case for that holds the sunglasses and an extra lens.

    I've used my M's for cycling for several years now. They're
    simply incredible.

    Michael

  3. I know this doesn't really answer your questions, I just
    wanted to put in my .02 about Oakleys. I've had 1 pair of
    Frogskins, 1 pair of M frames, and 3 pairs of Jackets that
    ended up with broken frames. All of the frames were
    'crystal' (translucent colour) so that may be a
    contributing factor.

    The story I heard (not from Oakley) was that the plastic in
    Oakley frames does not stand up well to the combination of
    sweat and sunscreen. All of the cracks developed in the top
    of the frames, just above one of the lenses, and the frames
    had not been abused (sat on, stepped on, etc.) I've since
    switched to Rudy Projects, and haven't had a problem since.
    PLUS, if the lenses ever scratch, for any reason, Rudy will
    replace them.

    I'm not trying to disuade you from Oakleys, while they held
    together, they were great sunglasses, just relating my
    experiences.

    Steve

    John Rogerson said:

    I'm lucky enough to have come into a little bit of money
    to waste as I want. I'm quite happy with my bikes so no
    need to change them but it does mean that I can fork out
    for some peripheral gear that I wouldn't normally spend
    much money on. A pair of Oakleys is on the list.

    I know the M frames are meant to be the ultimate sports
    sunnies but they really don't suit me. I want the
    changeable lens facility for different light conditions.

    How do the Half Jackets measure up for cycle use? I also
    do a fair bit of running and they would be used for that
    as well.

    Opinions appreciated.

    Cheers

  4. You can change the lenses on M frames. Do not get the type
    that have folding sides like regular glasses. I was breaking
    one pair/year due to lots of little cracks as described
    below. At first, Oakley would replace them for free, then
    they started charging $15. I finally got mad at them and
    sold all my lenses.

    I like the M frames better than the Half Jackets because
    the latter have frames that create a blind spot in my
    peripheral vision.

    That said, I'm thinking about getting some of the non-
    folding Ms again. The gray lens works really well in all
    light conditions.

    -Dion

    "Steve Niece" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I know this doesn't really answer your questions, I just
    wanted to put in my .02 about Oakleys. I've had 1 pair of
    Frogskins, 1 pair of M frames, and 3 pairs of Jackets that
    ended up with broken frames. All of the frames were
    'crystal' (translucent colour) so that may be a
    contributing factor.

    The story I heard (not from Oakley) was that the plastic
    in Oakley frames does not stand up well to the combination
    of sweat and sunscreen. All of the cracks developed in the
    top of the frames, just above one of the lenses, and the
    frames had not been abused (sat on, stepped on, etc.) I've
    since switched to Rudy Projects, and haven't had a problem
    since. PLUS, if the lenses ever scratch, for any reason,
    Rudy will replace them.

    I'm not trying to disuade you from Oakleys, while they
    held together, they were great sunglasses, just relating
    my experiences.

    Steve

    John Rogerson said:

    I'm lucky enough to have come into a little bit of money
    to waste as I want. I'm quite happy with my bikes so no
    need to change them but it does mean that I can fork out
    for some peripheral gear that I wouldn't normally spend
    much money on. A pair of Oakleys is on the list.

    I know the M frames are meant to be the ultimate sports
    sunnies but they really don't suit me. I want the
    changeable lens facility for different light conditions.

    How do the Half Jackets measure up for cycle use? I also
    do a fair bit of running and they would be used for that
    as well.

    Opinions appreciated.

    Cheers

  5. "Steve Niece" wrote...

    Quoted message said:

    I know this doesn't really answer your questions, I just
    wanted to put in my .02 about Oakleys. I've had 1 pair of
    Frogskins, 1 pair of M frames, and 3 pairs of Jackets that
    ended up with broken frames. All of the frames were
    'crystal' (translucent colour) so that may be a
    contributing factor.

    The story I heard (not from Oakley) was that the plastic
    in Oakley frames does not stand up well to the combination
    of sweat and sunscreen.

    I'd heard rumours about Oakleys too. HOWEVER. I have not
    found that to be the case in the two or three years I've had
    my M-frames. In addition, Oakley has a first-rate
    warranty/replacement policy. My daughter decided to remove
    my M-frames for me one day, cracking the housing where the
    bow (ear-piece) joins the main frame. I sent it back (got
    contact info here in rbr in fact), paid a $15 handling
    charge, and received new(?) frame (at least it looks and
    acts like new). They've been great.

    JF

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.