General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Race Report: Bolder Boulder 10K

Started by dp · · Last activity · 8 posts · 471 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 June 2004
Last activity
7 June 2004
Original author
dp
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
471
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I ran the Bolder Boulder 10K for the seventh time on
    May 31, 2004.

    My strategy for the race was to run even splits of 5 minute
    kilometers, to try to beat my 10K PR of 49:56. I had
    optimistically written 49:00 as my expected finish time on
    the race entry form, expecting fully not to do that well.

    My training had not gone as well as I had hoped. Ever since
    running my first marathon back in December 2003, I settled
    back to about 25 miles per week, but it seemed that my
    weekly miles had been decreasing steadily, primarily due to
    lack of time for getting in a long run on weekends. During
    the month of May, I was down to about 15 miles per week.
    Also, I was having a difficult time running 8 minute miles
    during training.

    The Bolder Boulder uses a wave start, with qualifying times
    used for seeding into the faster front waves. I had
    qualified for the sub-49:15 wave with a 23:21 time in a 5K
    race about 10 months previous. I always start too fast and
    fade in the latter miles of races I run, so for sure I
    didn't think I could make my "predicted" time of 49:00.

    Since the Bolder Boulder is the only race that I have run
    that marks both kilometers and miles, and I decided to use
    kilometer splits rather than mile splits to pace myself,
    because kilometers would allow for more opportunities to
    adjust my pace.

    The day was relatively cool, with a slight breeze, and the
    usual Colorado low humidity. It made for perfect
    conditions. I ran the race with a co-worker, who was in
    the same qualifying wave and also hoped to finish in under
    50 minutes.

    We started off about halfway back in our wave, I didn't
    want to get up at the front and impede those runners that
    truly had a shot a 49 minutes. Our pace for the first two
    kilometers was about what I expected, 4:39 and 4:54,
    (about 7:30 and 7:54 minutes per mile respectively), and
    really close to the pace I ran two years ago when I had
    set my PR. At that point I expected my pace to start to
    decrease throughout the rest of the race, like it does in
    every race I run.

    I was in for a surprise. Kilometer 3 was 4:44 and kilometer
    4 was 5:02, right on pace. To my amazement, I didn't slow
    down. Here are my splits for the entire race:

    4:39 4:54 4:44 5:02 4:52 4:54 4:46 4:52 4:53 4:34

    I am especially please with my final split of 4:34 -- I'm
    usually running out of steam by then, and it has the tough
    uphill into the stadium, yet it was my fastest split.

    I am elated with my finishing time of 48:11 (my watch),
    beating my PR by
    5:40, and at least two minutes better than my expected time.
    I'm 46, I'm not supposed to be setting PR's.

    Looking back, I think I did better than expected for
    several reasons:

    Marathon training I started on at the same pace I
    always do for a 10K, but the long distance training for
    a marathon allowed me to keep that same pace through
    out the run.

    Month long taper I (unintentionally) tapered for this race
    when I pulled back to 15 miles/week.

    Cool,breezy weather Always improves performance

    Running with someone We paced each other. When I felt
    myself slowing down, I pushed myself to keep up. Likewise
    for my co-worker.

    Using K splits Allowed for more constant monitoring of
    pace.

    Overall, the race was great experience (as are all PR
    setting races :-). Boulder has always been one of my
    favorite road races, it is well organized, does a great job
    of handling so many runners, and I always run a fast time.
    I'll be back every year I can and try to keep setting PRs,
    at least until the years catch up to me.

    David Pinedo

  2. [email hidden] wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I ran the Bolder Boulder 10K for the seventh time on May
    31, 2004.

    <snipped a great race report>

    Quoted message said:


    Overall, the race was great experience (as are all PR
    setting races :-). Boulder has always been one of my
    favorite road races, it is well organized, does a great
    job of handling so many runners, and I always run a fast
    time. I'll be back every year I can and try to keep
    setting PRs, at least until the years catch up to me.

    Congrats on your new PR David!!!! Way to go!!!!

    Quoted message said:

    David Pinedo

  3. Wow, what a wonderful surprise David! Big kudos to you!
    Thanks for sending the detailed report. I had a freind run
    it, so I got a bit of a feel for it from your report. That's
    a really big improvement for a 10k.

    Teresa in AZ

    Quoted message said:

    My strategy for the race was to run even splits of 5
    minute kilometers, to try to beat my 10K PR of 49:56. I
    had optimistically written 49:00 as my expected finish
    time on the race entry form, expecting fully not to do
    that well.

    I was in for a surprise. Kilometer 3 was 4:44 and
    kilometer 4 was 5:02, right on pace. To my amazement, I
    didn't slow down. Here are my splits for the entire race:

    4:39 4:54 4:44 5:02 4:52 4:54 4:46 4:52 4:53 4:34

    I am elated with my finishing time of 48:11 (my watch),
    beating my PR by
    1:40, and at least two minutes better than my expected
    time. I'm 46, I'm not supposed to be setting PR's.

    David Pinedo

  4. Quoted message said:


    I am elated with my finishing time of 48:11 (my watch),
    beating my PR by 1:40, and at least two minutes better
    than my expected time.

    Well done! A PRs a PR, no matter what the time.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm 46, I'm not supposed to be setting PR's.

    Have to disagree with you there (and agree with Cam). At 46
    you've still got plenty of years to improve.

    Tim
    --
    Remove the obvious to reply by email.

  5. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    My strategy for the race was to run even splits of 5
    minute kilometers, to try to beat my 10K PR of 49:56. I
    had optimistically written 49:00 as my expected finish
    time on the race entry form, expecting fully not to do
    that well.

    I was in for a surprise. Kilometer 3 was 4:44 and
    kilometer 4 was 5:02, right on pace. To my
    amazement, I didn't slow down. Here are my splits
    for the entire race:

    4:39 4:54 4:44 5:02 4:52 4:54 4:46 4:52 4:53 4:34

    I am elated with my finishing time of 48:11 (my watch),
    beating my PR by
    1:40, and at least two minutes better than my expected
    time. I'm 46, I'm not supposed to be setting PR's.

    David Pinedo


    hey, don't say that! We are only as young as we think we
    are, and as an example, at age 40, I just recently broke my
    5K personal record, which I had set three years ago. hard
    work and a good attitude can make anything happen.

    great splits.... you were very conservative with a 5min/km
    goal pace, considering what you churned out in the race.
    you'll be looking at a 45-46 min. 10k before you know it. my
    first 10k was around 50 min. and my best is now 45 and
    change. mind you, that time is a few years old, so maybe i'm
    due to break it 🙂

    good race,

    cam

  6. Tim Downie <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : [email hidden] wrote:

    :> I'm 46, I'm not supposed to be setting PR's.

    : Have to disagree with you there (and agree with Cam). At
    : 46 you've still got plenty of years to improve.

    I did some running for about 3 years when I was in my early
    20's, didn't run for many years, then started up again about
    7 years ago. I got serious about running only about 2 years
    ago, so I can see why I'm still improving.

    Does anyone know when the typical runner peaks as he ages?
    I've heard the peak is later in life for the longer
    distances, and earlier for the shorter distances. Does
    anyone know of any studies that have been done on this?

    David Pinedo

  7. Quoted message said:

    Does anyone know when the typical runner peaks as he ages?
    I've heard the peak is later in life for the longer
    distances, and earlier for the shorter distances. Does
    anyone know of any studies that have been done on this?

    I do not know of many studies, but the general consensus I
    have heard is that professionals run their best times
    between the ages of 23-28, then you still hear of
    professionals in their early 30's breaking their PBs.

    Ed

  8. Quoted message said:

    Does anyone know when the typical runner peaks as he ages?
    I've heard the peak is later in life for the longer
    distances, and earlier for the shorter distances. Does
    anyone know of any studies that have been done on this?

    I do not know of many studies, but the general consensus I
    have heard is that professionals run their best times
    between the ages of 23-28, then you still hear of
    professionals in their early 30's breaking their PBs.

    Ed

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.