General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Lake walk from Waterhead

Started by Paul Blake · · Last activity · 13 posts · 481 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
25 April 2004
Last activity
26 April 2004
Original author
Paul Blake
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
481
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Prior to my week long wild camp, I am planning a walk to
    get a feel for hill walking again. (It's been 20 years
    since my last hill walk with the boy scouts) I am quite fit
    "I cycle dally" I most certainly want to visit the top of
    High pike to re-live some childhood memories; my planned
    route is as follows.

    Starting from Waterhead, heading north through the town, and
    picking up the trail passing nook end farm to the east,
    still heading North passed the waterfalls, and up to Low
    pike. Continuing north up to High Pike, north to Dove Crag,
    Hart Crag, Then Westerly past Rydal Head. South towards
    Great Rig, Past Rydal Fell, Herron Pike, Nab Scar, and then
    South easterly towards the road back to Waterhead.

    I'm thinking that this may be too much to achieve in one
    day, I would appreciate any comments, suggestions

    Thanks in advance

    Paul

    --
    ...........................................................-
    ................

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    TQ 85030 88000

    Phew! only 257.187 miles to Scarfell Pike top!

  2. Quoted message said:

    walking again. (It's been 20 years since my last hill walk
    with the boy scouts) I am quite fit "I cycle dally"

    Hope you walk better Paul .......

    Quoted message said:

    Starting from Waterhead, heading north through the town,
    and picking up


    the

    Quoted message said:

    trail passing nook end farm to the east, still heading
    North passed the waterfalls, and up to Low pike.
    Continuing north up to High Pike, north to Dove Crag, Hart
    Crag, Then Westerly past Rydal Head. South towards Great
    Rig, Past Rydal Fell, Herron Pike, Nab Scar, and then
    South easterly


    towards

    Quoted message said:

    the road back to Waterhead.

    Not sure where Waterhead is Paul, your starting point, but
    the walk you describe is the Fairfield Horseshoe anti-
    clockwise. I have done this route clockwise a few of times,
    (Feb the last time) from the large car park in north
    Ambleside, close to the small National Trust house over the
    river. Not a problem for a day walk if you are fit, just
    over the 10 mile mark, although again, do not know what
    extra distance you would need to do from 'this' Waterhead
    place. Normally takes me between 5 and 6 hours, depending on
    how often I stop for photographs. Its a nice outing though,
    great views on a clear day of all the Lakeland Fells. Hope
    you enjoy the walk. There are some photos from along the
    route from my Feb trip at the address below.

    --
    Sandy Saunders @ www.thewalkzone.co.uk

    "Mountains or Mole Hills ..... sumitting still brings the
    same excitement"

  3. Paul Blake said:

    Prior to my week long wild camp, I am planning a walk to
    get a feel for hill walking again. (It's been 20 years
    since my last hill walk with the boy scouts) I am quite fit
    "I cycle dally"

    I cycle to work daily and it most certainly doesn't make me
    walking fit.
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the
    "Westminster Gasworks"

  4. "sandy saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:4IJic.16$cy3.9@newsfe1-win...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    walking again. (It's been 20 years since my last hill
    walk with the boy scouts) I am quite fit "I cycle dally"


    (I did see the typo "dally" but only after i hit send) 😉

    Quoted message said:


    Hope you walk better Paul .......

    When I say fit, as I cycle daily I'm fitter than the average
    person who drives or takes the bus, sorry I should have
    mentioned that most of my cycling is done off road on very
    rough terrain, which is good for the leg muscles, and
    strengthening the lower back, so I think the cycling I do is
    relevant to my fitness for this walk.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Not sure where Waterhead is Paul, >
    --
    Sandy Saunders @ www.thewalkzone.co.uk

    Waterhead? Ambleside, Northeast of the lake

    streetmap.co.uknewmap.srf
    3&sv=337500,503500&st=4&mapp=newmap.srf&searchp=newsearch.-
    srf&dn=741

  5. Paul Blake said:

    I'm thinking that this may be too much to achieve in one
    day, I would appreciate any comments, suggestions

    No problem if you're reasonably fit. You can loiter a bit
    and still fit it in quite easily.

    --

    Paul

    My Lake District walking site (updated 29th September 2003):

    paulrooney.netfirms.compaulrooney.netfirms.com

  6. Quoted message said:

    Waterhead? Ambleside, Northeast of the lake

    Cheers Paul. I was using my Superscale Anquet map at the
    time and that doesn't actually show Waterhead on the map.
    Later, I had a look at my OS1:25,000 and there was Waterhead
    on the map just south of Ambleside ....... at the head of
    Windermere.

    --
    Sandy Saunders @ www.thewalkzone.co.uk

    "Mountains or Mole Hills ..... sumitting still brings the
    same excitement"

  7. Paul Blake said:

    so I think the cycling I do is relevant to my fitness for
    this walk.

    Might be in cardio-vascular terms, but I think there's
    quite a difference between walking and cycling as far as
    your legs go. Not to mention feet and ankles. However, even
    my moaning car-bound kids completed this route, albeit
    after some time...

    It's a good walk. Reverse the route and do it clockwise if
    you would prefer the steepest part nearer the beginning than
    the end. I would also say that finishing by walking all the
    way back along the road to Ambleside is really boring and
    the traffic noise becomes quickly tiresome. You could
    consider parking at Rydal itself (some spots by the church,
    honesty box provided) and a bit of research should indicate
    how to get from there over to your original route somewhere
    between Low Sweden Bridge and High Sweden Bridge.

    --
    My computer has a nut loose on the keyboard.

    Mail john rather than nospam...

  8. Quoted message said:

    It's a good walk. Reverse the route and do it clockwise if
    you would


    prefer

    Quoted message said:

    the steepest part nearer the beginning than the end. I
    would also say


    that

    Quoted message said:

    finishing by walking all the way back along the road to
    Ambleside is


    really

    Quoted message said:

    boring and the traffic noise becomes quickly tiresome. You
    could consider parking at Rydal itself (some spots by the
    church, honesty box provided)


    and

    Quoted message said:

    a bit of research should indicate how to get from there
    over to your original route somewhere between Low Sweden
    Bridge and High Sweden Bridge.

    Thanks, a good idea, I would prefer to take the steepest
    part first and as for parking, it's not a consideration as I
    am travelling to Windermere by train.

  9. Paul Blake said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's a good walk. Reverse the route and do it clockwise
    if you would


    prefer

    Quoted message said:

    the steepest part nearer the beginning than the end. I
    would also say


    that

    Quoted message said:

    finishing by walking all the way back along the road to
    Ambleside is


    really

    Quoted message said:

    boring and the traffic noise becomes quickly tiresome.
    You could consider parking at Rydal itself (some spots by
    the church, honesty box provided)


    and

    Quoted message said:

    a bit of research should indicate how to get from there
    over to your original route somewhere between Low Sweden
    Bridge and High Sweden Bridge.

    Thanks, a good idea, I would prefer to take the steepest
    part first and as for parking, it's not a consideration as
    I am travelling to Windermere by train.

    Are you taking the ferry from there to Ambleside ? (It would
    explain your uncommon name for the start of your walk - I
    only found it on my 1:25000 map and I'm sure most folks
    think the whole area *is* Ambleside). If you're taking a
    bus, I would recommend you get one that goes as far as Rydal
    and start from there. At least the finish of the clockwise
    route brings you into Ambleside through some quiet backroads
    and then right into the centre. As I said, the main road is
    really tedious to walk on (although on the same map it looks
    as if there is an alternative path alongside a park for some
    of it at least).

    --
    We should go metric every inch of the way!

    Mail john rather than nospam...

  10. Quoted message said:

    Are you taking the ferry from there to Ambleside ? (It
    would explain your uncommon name for the start of your
    walk - I only found it on my 1:25000 map and I'm sure most
    folks think the whole area *is* Ambleside).

    As somebody from the Lake District my opinion may not be
    that of the average Joe, but surely most people don't
    consider Waterhead 'uncommon' (whatever that means when
    applied to a location!). I would have thought most
    visitors to the south Lakes know of Waterhead! It's quite
    a popular spot with visitors/tourists, for feeding the
    ducks, sunbathing with an ice-cream, taking a trip on the
    Lake, etc. etc.

    Anyway, regardless of that, the feeling you get from a walk
    in the lakes after arriving in Windermere by train is far
    superior to that obtained from arriving by car. Sure it's
    not as convenient, but I'd recommend everybody try it once.
    It adds an extra element to the experience!

    Enjoy your walk.

    Michael S

  11. (Michael S) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Are you taking the ferry from there to Ambleside ? (It
    would explain your uncommon name for the start of your
    walk - I only found it on my 1:25000 map and I'm sure
    most folks think the whole area *is* Ambleside).

    As somebody from the Lake District my opinion may not be
    that of the average Joe, but surely most people don't
    consider Waterhead 'uncommon' (whatever that means when
    applied to a location!). I would have thought most visitors
    to the south Lakes know of Waterhead! It's quite a popular
    spot with visitors/tourists, for feeding the ducks,
    sunbathing with an ice-cream, taking a trip on the Lake,
    etc. etc.

    I've been visiting the LD for some 20 years, and I'd never
    heard of it, although I see it is also marked on my 1"
    tourist map (a very useful map indeed). Mea culpa.

    [How many visitors can really tell Bowness from
    Windermere ? ;-)]

    --
    Artificial Intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.

    Mail john rather than nospam...

  12. John Laird said:

    On 26 Apr 2004 07:09:37 -0700, [email hidden]

    (Michael S) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Are you taking the ferry from there to Ambleside ? (It
    would explain your uncommon name for the start of your
    walk - I only found it on my 1:25000 map and I'm sure
    most folks think the whole area *is* Ambleside).

    As somebody from the Lake District my opinion may not be
    that of the average Joe, but surely most people don't
    consider Waterhead 'uncommon' (whatever that means when
    applied to a location!). I would have thought most
    visitors to the south Lakes know of Waterhead! It's quite
    a popular spot with visitors/tourists, for feeding the
    ducks, sunbathing with an ice-cream, taking a trip on the
    Lake, etc. etc.

    I've been visiting the LD for some 20 years, and I'd never
    heard of it, although I see it is also marked on my 1"
    tourist map (a very useful map indeed). Mea culpa.

    Waterhead's a lakeside suburb of Ambleside and is the bus
    stop for the massive Ambleside YH.

  13. Thanks for your kind comments, I know slightly inconvenient
    by train, but I will get a chance to see some spectacular
    view that may be missed whilst having to keep your eyes on
    the road whilst driving.

    "Michael S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    As somebody from the Lake District my opinion may not be
    that of the average Joe, but surely most people don't
    consider Waterhead 'uncommon' (whatever that means when
    applied to a location!). I would have thought most
    visitors to the south Lakes know of Waterhead! It's quite
    a popular spot with visitors/tourists, for feeding the
    ducks, sunbathing with an ice-cream, taking a trip on the
    Lake, etc. etc.

    Anyway, regardless of that, the feeling you get from a
    walk in the lakes after arriving in Windermere by train is
    far superior to that obtained from arriving by car. Sure
    it's not as convenient, but I'd recommend everybody try it
    once. It adds an extra element to the experience!

    Enjoy your walk.

    Michael S

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.