General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Fit for life

Started by C W Browne · · Last activity · 10 posts · 1,485 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
3 March 2004
Last activity
9 March 2004
Original author
C W Browne
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,485
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Book "Fit for Life A New Beginning" by Harvey Diamond

    This book, published in 2000, is by the co-author of the previous best-seller "Fit for Life. It
    reveals how we can take charge of our health and prevent disease. With its logical common-sense
    approach, it is one of the best books on health that I have read. Some quotations follow:

    "It can appear that it is haphazard circumstances that bring on ill health, but it is not." P14.

    "I don't just want to show people what to do after they're sick; I want to show them what to do so
    they don't become sick." P15.

    "The fact that impeccably reliable and effective methods of prevention and healing are virtually
    hidden from the general public is a tragedy of immense proportions." P16.

    "Can you see that the basic function of medicine is after-the-fact treatment. Rather than focusing
    on the cause of the problem, it focuses on lessening the symptoms of the problem." P45.

    "The enormous importance of diet in determining our health is no longer a matter of speculation but
    rather a well established, scientifically substantiated fact of life." P46.

    "The cleaner the body is, the better it works." P52.

    "How sad that the prevailing opinion of traditional medicine ignores the need for inner
    cleansing." P57.

    "You see, cancer is not the problem, it is the end result of the problem."
    P61.

    "Incidence of cancer is also increasing, suggesting a failure to prevent or control new or current
    causes of cancer." P65.

    "Millions of animals have been tortured throughout the world to find the cure of a malady which has
    been steadily increasing for 50 years." P66 (referring to words written in 1924, that just as
    relevant today).

    "Where that (cancer) happens isn't the most important thing. Why it happens is the issue." P69.

    "Traditional therapies of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy attack the problem at the end stages
    of its growth, after the fact. It is attacking the effect while ignoring the cause." P70.

    "Cancer will never just happen. It will inevitably be the result of causes that were not removed
    over a very long period of time." P70.

    "By and large, drugs don't do any good in addressing the underlying causes of illness. Although they
    can block symptoms that can be life-threatening, in most cases they are overused and misused." P88

    "The causes are never addressed, ensuring that whatever problem was being drugged gets worse,
    requiring even more drugs." P92.

    "Drugs do have their place. Emergency situations require emergency measures and sometimes, under
    certain circumstances, drugs fulfil that need." P94.

    "We must nurture a genuine appreciation for the unparalleled ability to heal that our bodies
    possess." P97.

    "Radiation and chemotherapy are poisons. They poison and kill both cancer cells and healthy cells.
    Moreover, these treatments are themselves carcinogenic. That's right, the treatment for cancer
    causes cancer." P114.

    "Women have choices outside of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation and they are not being told about
    them." P130.

    "It would be one thing if the incidence of, and death rate from, breast cancer were steadily
    decreasing, but the exact opposite is true." P130.

    "That I am not a medical doctor is in my favor. It afforded me the opportunity to study before-the-
    fact treatment instead of after-the-fact treatment." P131.

    "There's no drug, no shot, no pill, no potion that will prevent the inevitable results of negative
    living habits from coming to pass." P152.

    "The greatest threat to your health is the overconsumption of animal products. Animal products
    include all meat, chicken, fish, eggs, and dairy products." P179.

    "High-fat animal products stimulate the development of free radicals. Antioxidant rich fruits and
    vegetables prevent their formation." P190.

    "The relationship between a healthy life and regular exercise is irrefutable." P206.

    "Good thoughts produce good things and negative thoughts produce negative things." P281.

    "Scholars and researchers have shown that repressed, unvented anger, coupled with a lack of self-
    love, has been a major contributor in many cases of all kinds of disease." P300.

    Christopher Browne.

  2. spammer!

    "C W Browne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Book "Fit for Life A New Beginning" by Harvey Diamond

  3. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Fit for life
    From: "Gymmy Bob" [email hidden]
    Date: 3/3/04 8:10 PM Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    spammer

    [censored].

    Prove it.

    DrC PhD.

  4. Prove what? You cannot read?

    "DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Fit for life From: "Gymmy Bob" [email hidden] Date: 3/3/04 8:10 PM Eastern
    Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    spammer

    [censored].

    Prove it.

    DrC PhD.

  5. Complaint sent to

    [email hidden]

    "Gymmy Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Prove what? You cannot read?

    "DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040303211136.10061.00000888@mb-
    m17.aol.com...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Fit for life From: "Gymmy Bob" [email hidden] Date: 3/3/04 8:10 PM Eastern
    Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    spammer

    [censored].

    Prove it.

    DrC PhD.

  6. Gymmy Bob <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    spammer!

    Spam is Unsolicited Bulk Email, posting internet links or
    book reviews in a UseNet newsgroup does not qualify as spam.

    Spam is a luncheon meat product.

    Your usage of this word is an infringement of a copyright
    trade name. Unless you have express written permission to
    use the word "Spam" you are liable to litigation from the
    copyright holder namesake company.

    I think you're getting a little too agitated over this. It's
    amazing how some people get a handful of postal junk mail
    every day, and sheepishly dump it in the trash. Those same
    people, get email offering the same thing and they react
    like someone just gave them the finger in traffic, broke
    their windshield, and drove away.

    In America, we receive enough 3rd class postal mail to fill
    both buildings of the World Trade Center three and a half
    times each year. (If they were still there!) The U.S.
    government spends 320 million dollars a year to dispose of
    junk mail waste.

    It costs the same to send email as it does to receive it.
    That old argument that it "shifts costs to the recipient" is
    a load of [censored]. They are talking like bulk emailers get free
    InterNet access. If you used some persons account to dial in
    and send each email to them, then the whole cost would be
    theirs, but that's not the way it happens, the sender has an
    account also that they pay for.

    Would the anti-spammers accept it if it was metered like
    postal mail, and they got $2 off their InterNet bill each
    month to accept it? No way. It's not about cost, it's
    about control. The net-nazi types want control over what
    is sent and received on the InterNet. The few have become
    so polarized on this, they are almost angry to the point
    of madness.

    Another thing that gets me is when people have an
    "expectation of privacy" in a worldwide public forum like
    the InterNet. Your postal address is sold or traded several
    times a day on average, that's why you get so much junk mail
    in your postal mailbox. To expect that, on the InterNet,
    everything should be different, that it should be a Utopian
    place, free of advertising or solicitation, is insanity. The
    InterNet is a reflection of the "real world". You get mail
    both places, some will be unsolicited advertisements just
    like your postal mail box.

    I think it's time to break out of your dream-world where
    nobody should use the InterNet to make a living. Now of
    course, I'm on your side

    email out to a bulk list. They have become the lightning rod
    for the industry, there is no denying that.

    The point is, bulk email is too powerful to be ignored.
    Small businesses are at an all-time high, and most startups
    don't have the average $13,500 it costs to send out 100,000
    post cards with a sales offer on it. They will however,
    invest a few hundred dollars in software, and an InterNet
    connection. In this case, the genie is out of the bottle,
    and will not be put back in.

    Every message in every newsgroup is an unsolicited e-mail by
    definition. You did not request the author of the message to
    send to you via the newsgroup therefore every message meets
    your "daffy nition" (sic) of "Spam". Newsgroups are open &
    public & free, you choose to select and participate in them.
    If you don't like them, their content or the commercial
    content go elsewhere.

    Get off the 'net and it won't bother you. Set some filters
    to block messages you don't want. Set some filters to block
    key words in messages you don't want. You have control of
    what you receive. Don't cry about getting things you might
    not like. E-mail is growing as a communication means. If you
    don't like beer stay out of bars... Nobody forces you to go
    to certain newsgroups ! Shoot the mailman too.... he brings
    real paper junk to your door. He is endorsing the killing of
    trees and the depletion of the ozone layer by the
    destruction of trees and the rape of the land by the clear
    cutting practices of lumber companies to provide the paper
    to bring real physical junk mail to your door. Shoot him
    today. Read the title of an e-mail if it seems like junk to
    you don't read it and you only involve a few electrons that
    will dissipate into heat for your house in the Winter.

    Mr. Counterpoint.

    Quoted message said:

    "C W Browne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Book "Fit for Life A New Beginning" by Harvey Diamond


  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    No Way said:


    Gymmy Bob <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:zeidnTG804bKHNvdRVn-
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    spammer!

    Spam is Unsolicited Bulk Email, posting internet
    links or book reviews in a UseNet newsgroup does not
    qualify as spam.

    Commercial advertising does.

    Quoted message said:

    Spam is a luncheon meat product.

    Among other things.

    Quoted message said:

    Your usage of this word is an infringement of a copyright
    trade name. Unless you have express written permission to
    use the word "Spam" you are liable to litigation from the
    copyright holder namesake company.

    Ah yes, this stupid and erroneous claim again.

    Quoted message said:

    It costs the same to send email as it does to receive it.
    That old argument that it "shifts costs to the recipient"
    is a load of [censored].

    Not when it comes to download time.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
    opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
    have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
    standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  8. Was it good for you?

    "No Way" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:T3o2c.132$X_4.863@newscontent-
    01.sprint.ca...

    Quoted message said:


    Gymmy Bob <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:zeidnTG804bKHNvdRVn-
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    spammer!

    Spam is Unsolicited Bulk Email, posting internet links
    or book reviews in a UseNet newsgroup does not qualify
    as spam.

  9. "No Way" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Your usage of this word is an infringement of a copyright
    trade name.


    Unless

    Quoted message said:

    you have express written permission to use the word "Spam"
    you are liable


    to

    Quoted message said:

    litigation from the copyright holder namesake company.

    Hogwash. SPAM is doing quite well due to the free
    publicity...

    mdientertainment.comspam sales.html

    abcnews.go.comspam0
    10226.html

    In the era of internet spam, sales are going up!

    finance.yahoo.combc

  10. "No Way" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Gymmy Bob <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:zeidnTG804bKHNvdRVn-
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    spammer!



    <<snipped>>

    Quoted message said:

    It costs the same to send email as it does to receive it.
    That old argument that it "shifts costs to the recipient"
    is a load of [censored]. They are talking like bulk emailers get
    free InterNet access. If you used some persons account to
    dial in and send each email to them, then the whole cost
    would be theirs, but that's not the way it happens, the
    sender has an account also that they pay for.

    Not exactly correct. A person sending a bulk email message
    only sends one message that is received on multiple
    computers. This one message is broken up into multiple
    copies, each to an intended recipient. The processing of
    these multiple messages place demands on the resources of
    various servers, forwarding and storing them. These messages
    take up storage space on servers as well as slow down the
    processing of other messages that were sent. Although, I
    admit, that I do use a bulk email service; I only solicit
    users who have 'opted-in.' Unsolicited messages are, in my
    opinion, undesirable. Bulk email is an effective means of
    broadcasting to readers and is ethical only when they've
    requested to receive the information.

    So, when I dispatch a bulk message from my computer it is
    sent only once. But, when it hits an email server it is
    broken up into as many copies as there are recipients on my
    list. Therefore, the bulk of the cost has been transferred,
    indeed, to the various recipients of the message(s).

    <<snipped>>

    Quoted message said:

    Another thing that gets me is when people have an
    "expectation of privacy" in a worldwide public forum like
    the InterNet. Your postal address is sold or traded
    several times a day on average, that's why you get so much
    junk mail in your postal mailbox. To expect that, on the
    InterNet, everything should be different, that it should
    be a Utopian place, free of advertising or solicitation,
    is insanity. The InterNet is a reflection of the "real
    world". You get mail both places, some will be unsolicited
    advertisements just like your postal mail box.

    Again, in postal mail, the sender bears all costs of the
    message. Using email, the handlers of the message as well as
    the recipient bear the cost due to extra storage and
    processing costs.

    <<snipped>>

    Quoted message said:

    Every message in every newsgroup is an unsolicited e-mail
    by definition. You did not request the author of the
    message to send to you via the newsgroup therefore every
    message meets your "daffy nition" (sic) of "Spam".
    Newsgroups are open & public & free, you choose to select
    and participate in them. If you don't like them, their
    content or the commercial content go elsewhere.

    When a users subscribe to a forum they are stating their
    willingness to receive messages that are relevant to that
    particular forum, so technically it is not "spam" but rather
    "opted-in". The "spam" comes from messages not relevant to
    the forum and that solicit the readers. But, I agree, we
    choose whether or not to read the messages relevant to the
    forum as we have opted to receive them. We have not, on the
    other hand, opted to receive messages that are off-topic or
    solicit us.

    Quoted message said:


    <<snipped>>

    Quoted message said:

    Shoot the mailman too.... he brings real paper junk to
    your door. He

    ...is doing the job the message sender has paid for....

    Quoted message said:

    is endorsing the killing of trees and the depletion of the
    ozone layer by the destruction of trees and the rape of
    the land by the clear cutting practices of lumber
    companies to provide the paper to bring real physical junk
    mail to your door. Shoot him today.

    Perhaps we should all shoot each other. As we all use paper
    and wood in some form or fashion....

    Quoted message said:

    Read the title of an e-mail if it seems like junk to you
    don't read it and you only involve a few electrons that
    will dissipate into heat for your house in the Winter.

    Mr. Counterpoint.

    Quoted message said:

    "C W Browne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Book "Fit for Life A New Beginning" by Harvey Diamond

    --
    --
    Arden Robinson says: Are We Poisoning Ourselves?:
    workingsmarter.toxicfreehomes.comworkingsmarter.toxicfreehomes.com Moms, stay home
    with the kids: workingsmarter.momsmakemore.comworkingsmarter.momsmakemore.com Tax
    breaks for you: workingsmarter.justsaycash.comworkingsmarter.justsaycash.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.