Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

question: fitday.com

Started by Monique Y. Herm · · Last activity · 10 posts · 2,409 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
24 February 2004
Last activity
5 March 2004
Original author
Monique Y. Herm
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,409
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Pippen and Joel Crum mentioned this site on the "dumb fat person post" thread, but I think they
    might be from that racing ng.

    Anyway, does anyone use this? I've used it for two days now to record my meals and activities. The
    thing is, their analysis of my calorie usage seems *way* off. I'm a software type, so I listed
    myself as "seated work, some movement." (I do have to walk among buildings now and then, and I'm not
    chained to my desk.)

    Anyway, they seem to have this crazy idea that, even with no exercise, I burn 2507 calories a day.
    Granted, I weigh a "healthy" 163-ish pounds, so I'm not small, but this seems high.

    Does anyone else use this and have an opinion on their estimates?

    --
    monique

  2. Monique Y. Herman stood on a soapbox and shouted to anyone who would
    listen :

    Quoted message said:

    Pippen and Joel Crum mentioned this site on the "dumb fat person post" thread, but I think they
    might be from that racing ng.

    Anyway, does anyone use this? I've used it for two days now to record my meals and activities. The
    thing is, their analysis of my calorie usage seems *way* off. I'm a software type, so I listed
    myself as "seated work, some movement." (I do have to walk among buildings now and then, and I'm
    not chained to my desk.)

    Anyway, they seem to have this crazy idea that, even with no exercise, I burn 2507 calories a day.
    Granted, I weigh a "healthy" 163-ish pounds, so I'm not small, but this seems high.

    Does anyone else use this and have an opinion on their estimates?

    147.208.9.133Default.asp here's one I've messed around with.

    usda sponsored. I like how it tells you where you could stand to improve, doing good.,..

    penny

  3. "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Pippen and Joel Crum mentioned this site on the "dumb fat person post" thread, but I think they
    might be from that racing ng.

    Anyway, does anyone use this? I've used it for two days now to record my meals and activities. The
    thing is, their analysis of my calorie usage seems *way* off. I'm a software type, so I listed
    myself as "seated work, some movement." (I do have to walk among buildings now and then, and I'm
    not chained to my desk.)

    Anyway, they seem to have this crazy idea that, even with no exercise, I burn 2507 calories a day.
    Granted, I weigh a "healthy" 163-ish pounds, so I'm not small, but this seems high.

    Does anyone else use this and have an opinion on their estimates?

    --
    monique

    Does seem somewhat high to me. Seems to oversimplify a lot - not that you really can't, otherwise
    it'd be incredibly complex and take way too long to fill in.

    It told me, with my 1 hour or so of fairly heavy duty weight training, and my "seated work, some
    movement" (combo of walking to class, sitting in class, and machine shop occasionally), that I
    burned 3023 calories. Seems a bit high to me - especially since only 370 of those were from the
    weight lifting!

    I did eat over 3200 calories today though, and 184g of protein (!!!), so at least I'm still above
    what I burning!

    Jon "Trying to gain weight" Bond

  4. "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Pippen and Joel Crum mentioned this site on the "dumb fat person post" thread, but I think they
    might be from that racing ng.

    Anyway, does anyone use this? I've used it for two days now to record my meals and activities.
    The thing is, their analysis of my calorie usage seems *way* off. I'm a software type, so I
    listed myself as "seated work, some movement." (I do have to walk among buildings now and then,
    and I'm not chained to my desk.)

    Anyway, they seem to have this crazy idea that, even with no exercise, I burn 2507 calories a
    day. Granted, I weigh a "healthy" 163-ish pounds, so I'm not small, but this seems high.

    Does anyone else use this and have an opinion on their estimates?

    --
    monique

    Does seem somewhat high to me. Seems to oversimplify a lot - not that you really can't, otherwise
    it'd be incredibly complex and take way too long


    to

    Quoted message said:

    fill in.

    It told me, with my 1 hour or so of fairly heavy duty weight training, and my "seated work, some
    movement" (combo of walking to class, sitting in class, and machine shop occasionally), that I
    burned 3023 calories. Seems


    a

    Quoted message said:

    bit high to me - especially since only 370 of those were from the weight lifting!

    I did eat over 3200 calories today though, and 184g of protein (!!!), so


    at

    Quoted message said:

    least I'm still above what I burning!

    Jon "Trying to gain weight" Bond

    Just think....if you put a bit more effort into sitting around for 8 hours a day you could give the
    hours worth of weights a miss altogether ;-) Dave.
    p.s. - if you want to put weight on, just come to Walsall...seems to be something in the air ;-
    )...can send you pics as proof if you want 8-D

  5. "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Pippen and Joel Crum mentioned this site on the "dumb fat person post" thread, but I think they
    might be from that racing ng.

    Anyway, does anyone use this? I've used it for two days now to record my meals and activities. The
    thing is, their analysis of my calorie usage seems *way* off. I'm a software type, so I listed
    myself as "seated work, some movement." (I do have to walk among buildings now and then, and I'm
    not chained to my desk.)

    Anyway, they seem to have this crazy idea that, even with no exercise, I burn 2507 calories a day.
    Granted, I weigh a "healthy" 163-ish pounds, so I'm not small, but this seems high.

    Does anyone else use this and have an opinion on their estimates?

    --
    monique

    Monique,

    I'm interested in your findings... I have compared the cycling part (comparing average speeds based
    on a "average" road ride) to other calculators and found that fitday.com is very close in calories
    burned. What I have not compared is the BMR part. I too looked at my daily BMR for "Seated Work" and
    thought mine was high...

    And yes, I lurk in both amb and "that racing ng"... race mountain bikes and a fan of road racing.
    Please list your findings...

    Thanks,

    -p

  6. On 2004-02-24, Pippen penned:

    Quoted message said:


    Monique,

    I'm interested in your findings... I have compared the cycling part (comparing average speeds
    based on a "average" road ride) to other calculators and found that fitday.com is very close in
    calories burned. What I have not compared is the BMR part. I too looked at my daily BMR for
    "Seated Work" and thought mine was high...

    And yes, I lurk in both amb and "that racing ng"... race mountain bikes and a fan of road racing.
    Please list your findings...

    Thanks,

    -p

    Pippen,

    Sorry to be silent for so long.

    I'm not sure, but it does seem that since I've started watching my calories using this site, I have
    generally consumed fewer calories than I've burned, and I've also been losing weight. But it's far
    too short a time span to be reliable -- I'll have to let you know in a few months =)

    --
    monique

  7. "Monique Y. Herman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 2004-02-24, Pippen penned:

    Quoted message said:


    Monique,

    I'm interested in your findings... I have compared the cycling part (comparing average speeds
    based on a "average" road ride) to other calculators and found that fitday.com is very close in
    calories burned. What I have not compared is the BMR part. I too looked at my daily BMR for
    "Seated Work" and thought mine was high...

    And yes, I lurk in both amb and "that racing ng"... race mountain bikes and a fan of road
    racing. Please list your findings...

    Thanks,

    -p

    Pippen,

    Sorry to be silent for so long.

    I'm not sure, but it does seem that since I've started watching my calories using this site, I
    have generally consumed fewer calories than I've burned, and I've also been losing weight. But
    it's far too short a time span to be reliable -- I'll have to let you know in a few months =)

    --
    monique

    Monique,

    Since last posting I have started using the Polar S720i which has a calorie counter. The S720i is
    consistently calculating less calories than fitday.com for me... Fitday.com is roughly 10 - 15 %
    higher than the S720i...

    -p

  8. "Pippen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:R_u1c.174894$uV3.736460@attbi_s51...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    monique

    Monique,

    Since last posting I have started using the Polar S720i which has a


    calorie

    Quoted message said:

    counter. The S720i is consistently calculating less calories than


    fitday.com

    Quoted message said:

    for me... Fitday.com is roughly 10 - 15 % higher than the S720i...

    -p

    I use the 720i also. One thing which is crucial to its optimal use, is getting the VO2 max setting
    correct. Polar has several paragraphs devoted to explaining this...They have what they call the
    "Polar Fitness Test", which they want you to do frequently, so you can update the VO2 max values as
    your training progresses--and this will change the calories the computer suggests you will be
    burning on a given workout. It only makes sense that a couch potato at 220 pounds, will have a
    relatively low potential for burning calories, compared to a 220 pound muscular person with strong
    aerobic base---burning the calories on the bike will be derived on the computer by figuring the
    oxygen processing potential of the person, at a given heart rate--again, this is dramatically
    different for a fit 220 pounder than it is for a HFS ( huge fat slob) of 220 pounds. Polar also
    suggests a clinical VO2 max measurement is even better than their convenient "fitness test", so this
    could be used instead for even better calorie estimating potential.

    I would also suggest that while counting calories is important ( or weighing your protein in ounces
    for each meal, along with carbs), it is far more important to make sure each meal you eat has the
    correct balance of protein and carb, and even the correct amount of fat. I tried Atkins for a while,
    when I first went on my "get back into shape" mode ( after 6 years of software development and
    drastically reduced riding and fitness sports). While it definitely works, it limits you once you
    begin to reach a certain training volume---when you start doing big miles. I don't think it is
    designed for an athlete to be able to replenish muscle glycogen effectively, day in, day out, when
    on an advanced training regimen. So I reverted to more of a "bodybuilder type diet" , with 7 to 8
    ounces of protein in each meal, along with a carb like 1.5 cups of white rice, or one large potato,
    or if morning, 2 cups of uncooked oatmeal with 7 eggwhites and with 2 yokes. I need around 6 meals
    per day, each has only the fat in it of the protein source ( either steak, lean ground beef, tuna
    fish, chicken, turkey, eggs with preset # of yokes, salmon, hogsnapper!!, etc). I take a multi
    vitamin and multi mineral supplement, along with 2 EPA/DHA pills each meal--this has helped
    enormously in causing my body to burn more fat. So far, since December, I have gone from 235 to 213
    ( business sidetracked me 2 weeks ago for a slight backslide, but I'm dropping weight again now).
    I'm getting about 11 to 12 hours of riding each week, along with gym workouts 2 to 3 days per week
    to keep every major muscle fiber in my body "calling" for calories to burn ( body builders have
    pretty well proven this is "more important" than aerobic training in order to burn off unwanted
    fat...but both is better than just the gym..Bodybuilders are unwilling to do the aerobic volumes of
    cyclists, because it will catabolize/burn up some of their muscle mass, and hurt mass development--
    which I could care less about). And I also think its critical for a HFS to do lots of core strength,
    abdominal work as they begin to get back into shape, since having a huge gut, tends to weaken
    abdominal support muscles, and postural issues resulting from this will not be corrected by just
    losing the fat--and this would hamper the attempt to get back into shape if not dealt with. Pilates
    is good for this, initially, and once core strength has returned, heavy bag workouts with kicking
    and punching tend to tie in well with both more core strength development, and interval training.
    I'll be down to 180 by summer, and I will never allow work to prevent a lifestyle of mountain biking
    and good mix of other sports again--meaning I will stay at this weight/bodyfat level as I have the
    vast majority of my life after college.

    I realize this "gram counting" approach to diet and training will "nauseate" many of the "free
    spirits" on this NG, however, if you are a HFS, and have been like this for a few years, it will be
    unlikely you can succeed in getting in to great shape without major efforts on your part.....For
    something this hard, and this important, why not choose the path which is most effective in gaining
    the desired results, and take no chances that failure could occur. Once you are at a 10% bodyfat
    level , then you can just ride alot and pretty much maintain your fitness without a lot of gram
    counting concerns----its getting to the 10% bodyfat level that will require the real effort, not
    holding it.

    I'd much rather be mountain biking than working :-) Regards, Dan V

  9. "Pippen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:R_u1c.174894$uV3.736460@attbi_s51...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    monique

    Monique,

    Since last posting I have started using the Polar S720i which has a


    calorie

    Quoted message said:

    counter. The S720i is consistently calculating less calories than


    fitday.com

    Quoted message said:

    for me... Fitday.com is roughly 10 - 15 % higher than the S720i...

    -p

    I use the 720i also. One thing which is crucial to its optimal use, is getting the VO2 max setting
    correct. Polar has several paragraphs devoted to explaining this...They have what they call the
    "Polar Fitness Test", which they want you to do frequently, so you can update the VO2 max values as
    your training progresses--and this will change the calories the computer suggests you will be
    burning on a given workout. It only makes sense that a couch potato at 220 pounds, will have a
    relatively low potential for burning calories, compared to a 220 pound muscular person with strong
    aerobic base---burning the calories on the bike will be derived on the computer by figuring the
    oxygen processing potential of the person, at a given heart rate--again, this is dramatically
    different for a fit 220 pounder than it is for a HFS ( huge fat slob) of 220 pounds. Polar also
    suggests a clinical VO2 max measurement is even better than their convenient "fitness test", so this
    could be used instead for even better calorie estimating potential.

    I would also suggest that while counting calories is important ( or weighing your protein in ounces
    for each meal, along with carbs), it is far more important to make sure each meal you eat has the
    correct balance of protein and carb, and even the correct amount of fat. I tried Atkins for a while,
    when I first went on my "get back into shape" mode ( after 6 years of software development and
    drastically reduced riding and fitness sports). While it definitely works, it limits you once you
    begin to reach a certain training volume---when you start doing big miles. I don't think it is
    designed for an athlete to be able to replenish muscle glycogen effectively, day in, day out, when
    on an advanced training regimen. So I reverted to more of a "bodybuilder type diet" , with 7 to 8
    ounces of protein in each meal, along with a carb like 1.5 cups of white rice, or one large potato,
    or if morning, 2 cups of uncooked oatmeal with 7 eggwhites and with 2 yokes. I need around 6 meals
    per day, each has only the fat in it of the protein source ( either steak, lean ground beef, tuna
    fish, chicken, turkey, eggs with preset # of yokes, salmon, hogsnapper!!, etc). I take a multi
    vitamin and multi mineral supplement, along with 2 EPA/DHA pills each meal--this has helped
    enormously in causing my body to burn more fat. So far, since December, I have gone from 235 to 213
    ( business sidetracked me 2 weeks ago for a slight backslide, but I'm dropping weight again now).
    I'm getting about 11 to 12 hours of riding each week, along with gym workouts 2 to 3 days per week
    to keep every major muscle fiber in my body "calling" for calories to burn ( body builders have
    pretty well proven this is "more important" than aerobic training in order to burn off unwanted
    fat...but both is better than just the gym..Bodybuilders are unwilling to do the aerobic volumes of
    cyclists, because it will catabolize/burn up some of their muscle mass, and hurt mass development--
    which I could care less about). And I also think its critical for a HFS to do lots of core strength,
    abdominal work as they begin to get back into shape, since having a huge gut, tends to weaken
    abdominal support muscles, and postural issues resulting from this will not be corrected by just
    losing the fat--and this would hamper the attempt to get back into shape if not dealt with. Pilates
    is good for this, initially, and once core strength has returned, heavy bag workouts with kicking
    and punching tend to tie in well with both more core strength development, and interval training.
    I'll be down to 180 by summer, and I will never allow work to prevent a lifestyle of mountain biking
    and good mix of other sports again--meaning I will stay at this weight/bodyfat level as I have the
    vast majority of my life after college.

    I realize this "gram counting" approach to diet and training will "nauseate" many of the "free
    spirits" on this NG, however, if you are a HFS, and have been like this for a few years, it will be
    unlikely you can succeed in getting in to great shape without major efforts on your part.....For
    something this hard, and this important, why not choose the path which is most effective in gaining
    the desired results, and take no chances that failure could occur. Once you are at a 10% bodyfat
    level , then you can just ride alot and pretty much maintain your fitness without a lot of gram
    counting concerns----its getting to the 10% bodyfat level that will require the real effort, not
    holding it.

    I'd much rather be mountain biking than working :-) Regards, Dan V

  10. "Dan Volker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Pippen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:R_u1c.174894$uV3.736460@attbi_s51...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    monique

    Monique,

    Since last posting I have started using the Polar S720i which has a


    calorie

    Quoted message said:

    counter. The S720i is consistently calculating less calories than


    fitday.com

    Quoted message said:

    for me... Fitday.com is roughly 10 - 15 % higher than the S720i...

    -p

    I use the 720i also. One thing which is crucial to its optimal use, is getting the VO2 max setting
    correct. Polar has several paragraphs devoted


    to

    Quoted message said:

    explaining this...They have what they call the "Polar Fitness Test", which they want you to do
    frequently, so you can update the VO2 max values as


    your

    Quoted message said:

    training progresses--and this will change the calories the computer


    suggests

    Quoted message said:

    you will be burning on a given workout. It only makes sense that a couch potato at 220 pounds,
    will have a relatively low potential for burning calories, compared to a 220 pound muscular person
    with strong aerobic base---burning the calories on the bike will be derived on the computer by
    figuring the oxygen processing potential of the person, at a given heart rate--again, this is
    dramatically different for a fit 220 pounder than it


    is

    Quoted message said:

    for a HFS ( huge fat slob) of 220 pounds. Polar also suggests a clinical VO2 max measurement is
    even better than their convenient "fitness test",


    so

    Quoted message said:

    this could be used instead for even better calorie estimating potential.

    I would also suggest that while counting calories is important ( or


    weighing

    Quoted message said:

    your protein in ounces for each meal, along with carbs), it is far more important to make sure
    each meal you eat has the correct balance of


    protein

    Quoted message said:

    and carb, and even the correct amount of fat. I tried Atkins for a while, when I first went on my
    "get back into shape" mode ( after 6 years of software development and drastically reduced


    riding

    Quoted message said:

    and fitness sports). While it definitely works, it limits you once you


    begin

    Quoted message said:

    to reach a certain training volume---when you start doing big miles. I


    don't

    Quoted message said:

    think it is designed for an athlete to be able to replenish muscle


    glycogen

    Quoted message said:

    effectively, day in, day out, when on an advanced training regimen. So I reverted to more of a
    "bodybuilder type diet" , with 7 to 8 ounces of protein in each meal, along with a carb like 1.5
    cups of white rice, or


    one

    Quoted message said:

    large potato, or if morning, 2 cups of uncooked oatmeal with 7 eggwhites


    and

    Quoted message said:

    with 2 yokes. I need around 6 meals per day, each has only the fat in it


    of

    Quoted message said:

    the protein source ( either steak, lean ground beef, tuna fish, chicken, turkey, eggs with preset
    # of yokes, salmon, hogsnapper!!, etc). I take a multi vitamin and multi mineral supplement, along
    with 2 EPA/DHA pills


    each

    Quoted message said:

    meal--this has helped enormously in causing my body to burn more fat. So far, since December, I
    have gone from 235 to 213 ( business sidetracked me


    2

    Quoted message said:

    weeks ago for a slight backslide, but I'm dropping weight again now). I'm getting about 11 to 12
    hours of riding each week, along with gym workouts 2 to 3 days per week to keep every major muscle
    fiber in my body "calling" for calories to burn ( body builders have pretty well proven


    this

    Quoted message said:

    is "more important" than aerobic training in order to burn off unwanted fat...but both is better
    than just the gym..Bodybuilders are unwilling to


    do

    Quoted message said:

    the aerobic volumes of cyclists, because it will catabolize/burn up some


    of

    Quoted message said:

    their muscle mass, and hurt mass development--which I could care less about). And I also think its
    critical for a HFS to do lots of core strength, abdominal work as they begin to get back into
    shape, since


    having

    Quoted message said:

    a huge gut, tends to weaken abdominal support muscles, and postural issues resulting from this
    will not be corrected by just losing the fat--and this would hamper the attempt to get back into
    shape if not dealt with. Pilates is good for this, initially, and once core strength has
    returned, heavy


    bag

    Quoted message said:

    workouts with kicking and punching tend to tie in well with both more core strength development,
    and interval training. I'll be down to 180 by summer, and I will never allow work to prevent a
    lifestyle of mountain biking and good mix of other sports again--meaning I will stay at this
    weight/bodyfat level as I have the vast majority of my life after college.

    I realize this "gram counting" approach to diet and training will


    "nauseate"

    Quoted message said:

    many of the "free spirits" on this NG, however, if you are a HFS, and have been like this for a
    few years, it will be unlikely you can succeed in getting in to great shape without major efforts
    on your part.....For something this hard, and this important, why not choose the path which is
    most effective in gaining the desired results, and take no chances that failure could occur. Once
    you are at a 10% bodyfat level , then you can just ride alot and pretty much maintain your fitness
    without a lot of gram counting concerns----its getting to the 10% bodyfat level that will


    require

    Quoted message said:

    the real effort, not holding it.

    I'd much rather be mountain biking than working :-) Regards, Dan V

    Dan,

    Thanks for reminder on VO2 settings on the S720i. This could be point of error in my readings since
    I have not reset/tested this value lately. Since I'm too cheap to get a clinical VO2 Max test I will
    re-run the Fit Test.

    As for dieting I have found that keeping a log of what I eat works best for
    me. On www.fitday.com logging your food you can generate reports on how well you are eating. I have
    lost eight pounds since January. I attribute this to increased volume of training and logging
    what I eat. When it's 8:00 PM and you feel like a snack go look at your log and see if you
    really need it... Anyhow, the other thing I also try to do is keep my meals colorful
    (literally)... The more colors the better the food groups, usually.

    Good luck on your weight loss. The season is just around the corner, but we still have a little time
    to lose...

    -p

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.