Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

full-sus ss

Started by Matthew Paterso · · Last activity · 24 posts · 1,630 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
7 February 2004
Last activity
13 February 2004
Original author
Matthew Paterso
Posts
24
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,630
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 24
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Whats the deal with Singlespeed full sus bikes? I mean, really!

    And surely wouldnt the chain tension decrease when the suspension is active?

    Madness

    --
    Matt

    Fear of a flat planet

  2. Matthew Paterson said:

    Whats the deal with Singlespeed full sus bikes? I mean, really!

    And surely wouldnt the chain tension decrease when the suspension is active?

    Madness

    What bikes FS SS bikes have you seen? The only one I know of is the Kona A:
    konaworld.com2k3 a.cfm and it looks like they don't offer it anymore (can't find it
    in 2004 bikes)

    I ride rigid, but I wouldn't mind givin' the A a try.

    G

  3. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: full-sus ss
    From: Gman [email hidden]
    Date: 2/7/2004 2:55 PM Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Matthew Paterson said:

    Whats the deal with Singlespeed full sus bikes? I mean, really!

    And surely wouldnt the chain tension decrease when the suspension is active?

    Madness

    What bikes FS SS bikes have you seen? The only one I know of is the Kona A:
    konaworld.com2k3 a.cfm and it looks like they don't offer it anymore (can't find it
    in 2004 bikes)

    I ride rigid, but I wouldn't mind givin' the A a try.

    G

    The "A" is available frame only for 2004

  4. Gman said:

    What bikes FS SS bikes have you seen?

    None from manufacturers like the Kona, just custom. Like this d00d off pinkbike :

    pinkbike.comphoto

    --
    Matt

    Fear of a flat planet

  5. Matthew Paterson <[email hidden]> had this to say
    "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:


    AAAACCCCCKKKKK!

  6. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    None from manufacturers like the Kona, just custom. Like this d00d off pinkbike :

    pinkbike.comphoto

    Can somebody explain what it is with "I-Drive"?

    The guys at the local LBS have a few in stock - but even they couldn't come up with a plausible-
    sounding explainatin for what's going on down there...
    --
    PeteCresswell

  7. (Pete Cresswell) said:

    RE/

    Quoted message said:

    None from manufacturers like the Kona, just custom. Like this d00d off pinkbike :

    pinkbike.comphoto

    Can somebody explain what it is with "I-Drive"?

    The guys at the local LBS have a few in stock - but even they couldn't come up with a plausible-
    sounding explainatin for what's going on down there...

    gtmountainbikes.comidrive.php

    --
    Slacker

  8. Matthew Paterson <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Whats the deal with Singlespeed full sus bikes? I mean, really!

    A cruel joke.

    Quoted message said:

    And surely wouldnt the chain tension decrease when the suspension is active?

    Not on a URT.

    Quoted message said:

    Madness

    No, sadness.

    JD

  9. (Pete Cresswell) said:

    RE/

    Quoted message said:

    None from manufacturers like the Kona, just custom. Like this d00d off pinkbike :

    pinkbike.comphoto

    Can somebody explain what it is with "I-Drive"?

    The guys at the local LBS have a few in stock - but even they couldn't come up with a plausible-
    sounding explainatin for what's going on down there...

    It is a unified-rear-triangle design with a bizarre floating bottom-bracket mechanism to make it
    seem less like a URT. A lot of work for little gain, if you ask me.

    Miles

  10. Quoted message said:

    gtmountainbikes.comidrive.php

    They decided to put all their cranks in the 11 and 5-o-clock positions. Weird.

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  11. "Matthew Paterson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Gman said:

    What bikes FS SS bikes have you seen?

    None from manufacturers like the Kona, just custom. Like this d00d off pinkbike :

    pinkbike.comphoto

    What a POS.

    -CA-G

    Can-Am Girls Kick Ass!

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Carla A-G said:

    "Matthew Paterson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Gman said:

    What bikes FS SS bikes have you seen?

    None from manufacturers like the Kona, just custom. Like this d00d off pinkbike :

    pinkbike.comphoto

    Speaking of manufacturer's FS SS bikes, Norco has added a bizarre but wonderful new machine to their
    already fairly bizarre "Supercross" lineup. I give you the Norco Four20:

    norco.comfour20.htm

    Looks like a URT design, but it has a heavy urban/dirt jump orientation. Not many singlespeed fans
    are likely to desire the axle pegs or Gyro cable rotor.

    No, I'm not sure why Kona and Norco, located about 40 km from each other and within driving distance
    of the Shore, both have FS SSes. I suppose if you're not climbing the trails under your own power,
    you only really need one gear.

    But hey, it's steel,

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] sfu.ca~rcousine President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

  13. Carla A-G said:

    "Matthew Paterson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Gman said:

    What bikes FS SS bikes have you seen?

    None from manufacturers like the Kona, just custom. Like this d00d off pinkbike :

    pinkbike.comphoto

    Quoted message said:

    What a POS.

    Look at the chain droop. That thing is a derailment waiting to happen. I don't care if people want
    to do this, but FFS do it right.

    And how come the crank isn't blue?

  14. "Matthew Paterson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Whats the deal with Singlespeed full sus bikes? I mean, really!

    And surely wouldnt the chain tension decrease when the suspension is active?

    Not if the pivot point is the center of the bottom bracket! I've often wondered why FS mtn bikes
    weren't designed this way to begin with.

    Quoted message said:

    Madness

    --
    Matt

    Fear of a flat planet

  15. onefred said:

    "Matthew Paterson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Whats the deal with Singlespeed full sus bikes? I mean, really!

    And surely wouldnt the chain tension decrease when the suspension is active?

    Not if the pivot point is the center of the bottom bracket! I've often wondered why FS mtn bikes
    weren't designed this way to begin with.

    Quoted message said:

    Madness

    --
    Matt

    Fear of a flat planet

    Read this:

    Quoted message said:

    math.chalmers.sebbpivot.html

    miles

  16. "onefred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<402850ef$0$43853

    Quoted message said:

    Not if the pivot point is the center of the bottom bracket! I've often wondered why FS mtn bikes
    weren't designed this way to begin with.

    Because it doesn't work as well as you might suppose?

    g

  17. "Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    (Pete Cresswell) said:

    RE/

    Quoted message said:

    None from manufacturers like the Kona, just custom. Like this d00d off pinkbike :

    pinkbike.comphoto

    Can somebody explain what it is with "I-Drive"?

    The guys at the local LBS have a few in stock - but even they couldn't come up with a plausible-
    sounding explainatin for what's going on down there...

    gtmountainbikes.comidrive.php

    Ach!!!!!!!!! What a fcuking gawd awful site! Never, EVER again!

    Shaun aRe utterly disgusted!

  18. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The guys at the local LBS have a few in stock - but even they couldn't come up with a plausible-
    sounding explainatin for what's going on down there...

    gtmountainbikes.comidrive.php

    Ach!!!!!!!!! What a fcuking gawd awful site! Never, EVER again!

    Shaun aRe utterly disgusted!

    If Rube Goldberg designed a suspension system, what would it be....
    --
    _________________________
    Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia ramsays-online.comramsays-online.com

  19. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Not if the pivot point is the center of the bottom bracket! I've often wondered why FS mtn bikes
    weren't designed this way to begin with.

    Because it doesn't work as well as you might suppose?

    Do you mean the problem of designing it around the bottom bracket shell or that having it pivot
    where it won't alter the chainstay length is a bad idea?

    Dave

  20. Quoted message said:

    Read this:

    Quoted message said:

    math.chalmers.sebbpivot.html

    Hey that's interesting. I didn't know that manufacturers were doing this. I don't know Rotec but
    I remember the Diablo. Can't recall it's design, tho. I couldn't find any info about it on the
    Jamis site.

    I still do not understand where the problem is (except that it is full suspension, lol). If you
    are concerned with pedaling efficiency then FS ain't your thang. FS is for DH and this seems
    like a superior design to me. Back to singlespeed, I think a design like this is the only
    practical solution.

    If you don't do DH and just need a full suspension bike to absorb the shock from the little pebbles
    on the course then I guess this is not a good design for you. The flaw then becomes your old
    dilapidated back and not the bike! (A little humor gents, don't flame me!)

    Of course what's most obvious is that only a few manufacturers adopted this system and now it
    appears to be abandoned. I can specualte that it must be a poor performer and/or be too expensive to
    manufacture and maintain.

    Dave "unsensitive is not a word, btw" T.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.