General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Oops.

Started by David Skinner · · Last activity · 38 posts · 1,273 views

← Back to General fitness, health and nutrition

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postOops.David Skinner · 21 Jan 2004 02 / This pagePosts 1–20Page 1 of 2 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #38Harbinger · 2 Feb 2004

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
21 January 2004
Last activity
2 February 2004
Original author
David Skinner
Posts
38
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,273
Views / 30 days
5

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 38
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Original post
    David Skinner
    Archived post
    #1

    ananova.comsm 858065.html

    -----------

    Magazine blunder directs walkers over cliff

    Britain's biggest-selling hillwalking magazine has apologised after the latest issue contained a
    route that would have led climbers off the edge of a cliff.

    The February edition of Trail gave advice to walkers caught in foul weather and poor visibility on
    how to get off Britain's tallest peak safely.

    If readers had followed the magazine's directions they would have plunged from Ben Nevis' north
    face, which has claimed a number of lives.

    Editor Guy Procter said he was "gutted" by the error, but did not believe it would endanger anyone's
    life. He said the article was written by a very experienced hillwalker from Loch Lomond and the
    mistake had occurred during the production process.

    "Somewhere in the journey to press, our route on Ben Nevis has lost the first of two bearings needed
    to get off the summit safely," he said. The first bearing of 150 metres for evading a dangerous
    gully had been deleted, leaving only the second bearing to follow, he added.

    The Mountaineering Council for Scotland has issued an alert on its website warning hillwalkers to be
    aware of the mistake. Spokesman Roger Wild said: "Getting off Ben Nevis is probably one of the most
    infamous navigational tasks in the British Isles.

    "Trail omitted the first bearing of 231 degrees which leads you away from Gardyloo Gully and only
    printed the second dogleg bearing that leads you off the summit. Anyone following that route in poor
    visibility and with snow cover could easily have walked straight off the edge."

    Peterborough-based Trail, which has a circulation of 36,000, was criticised last year for claiming
    popular routes were snow-free, even in winter. Mountain rescue teams branded the article on the
    three routes in the Cairngorms, the Highlands and the Lake District, irresponsible and inaccurate.

    Mr Procter said today: "I'm quite gutted at this mistake because we print up to 200 of these routes
    a year and this is the first time we've got it wrong.

    "No Trail reader would countenance going out on any mountain without a map, and the route is given a
    high technical rating, serving further to deter the novice. This gives me reason to be optimistic
    that our omission will swiftly be picked up by our readers."

    Story filed: 16:21 Wednesday 21st January 2004

    Report
  2. Katherine
    Archived post
    #2
    David Skinner said:

    ananova.comsm 858065.html

    -----------

    Magazine blunder directs walkers over cliff

    Britain's biggest-selling hillwalking magazine has apologised after the latest issue contained a
    route that would have led climbers off the edge of a cliff.

    The February edition of Trail gave advice to walkers caught in foul weather and poor visibility on
    how to get off Britain's tallest peak safely.

    If readers had followed the magazine's directions they would have plunged from Ben Nevis' north
    face, which has claimed a number of lives.

    Editor Guy Procter said he was "gutted" by the error, but did not believe it would endanger
    anyone's life. He said the article was written by a very experienced hillwalker from Loch Lomond
    and the mistake had occurred during the production process.

    "Somewhere in the journey to press, our route on Ben Nevis has lost the first of two bearings
    needed to get off the summit safely," he said. The first bearing of 150 metres for evading a
    dangerous gully had been deleted, leaving only the second bearing to follow, he added.

    Sounds like they needed a proofreader!

    Katherine

    Report
  3. Bob
    Archived post
    #3
    David Skinner said:

    This gives me reason to be optimistic that our omission will swiftly be picked up by our readers."

    As they hurtle over the cliff edge?

    Bob

    Report
  4. Rj Webb
    Archived post
    #4

    On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:15:53 +0000, Bob <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    David Skinner said:

    This gives me reason to be optimistic that our omission will swiftly be picked up by our readers."

    As they hurtle over the cliff edge?

    Yes.. who will pick(scrape?) up their readers?

    Richard Webb

    Report
  5. Craven Birds
    Archived post
    #5

    "Katherine" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    David Skinner said:

    ananova.comsm 858065.html

    -----------

    Magazine blunder directs walkers over cliff

    Britain's biggest-selling hillwalking magazine has apologised after the latest issue contained a
    route that would have led climbers off the edge of a cliff.

    The February edition of Trail gave advice to walkers caught in foul weather and poor visibility
    on how to get off Britain's tallest peak safely.

    If readers had followed the magazine's directions they would have plunged from Ben Nevis' north
    face, which has claimed a number of lives.

    Editor Guy Procter said he was "gutted" by the error, but did not believe it would endanger
    anyone's life. He said the article was written by a very experienced hillwalker from Loch Lomond
    and the mistake had occurred during the production process.

    "Somewhere in the journey to press, our route on Ben Nevis has lost the first of two bearings
    needed to get off the summit safely," he said. The first bearing of 150 metres for evading a
    dangerous gully had been deleted, leaving only the second bearing to follow, he added.

    Sounds like they needed a proofreader!

    I wouldn't imagine a proof-reader would have spotted that mistake;-)

    CB
    --
    Craven Birds

    Bird sightings based around 'Craven' Skipton, North Yorks.
    cravenbirds.mysite.freeserve.comcravenbirds.mysite.freeserve.com
    mysite.freeserve.comcravenbirds

    Report
  6. Druidh
    Archived post
    #6

    "RJ Webb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Bob said:
    David Skinner said:

    This gives me reason to be optimistic that our omission will swiftly be picked up by our
    readers."

    As they hurtle over the cliff edge?

    Yes.. who will pick(scrape?) up their readers?

    I believe that Trail will be giving away a free plastic sack with next months "episode" - all the
    better to collect body parts with.

    However, I foresee that they'll fail to warn their readers of being hit by falling Trail readers
    while searching for bodies beneath Gardyloo Gully and that that the BBC will have to interview the
    SMC, Tim Walker et al all over again!

    druidh

    Report
  7. Gordon
    Archived post
    #7

    Craven Birds <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Sounds like they needed a proofreader!

    I wouldn't imagine a proof-reader would have spotted that mistake;-)


    Ironically - I think they would, assuming that the original draft was correct. My mate was a proof
    reader, and they have to be able to detach from what they are reading, and should spot an omission,
    which this apparently was.

    However, in this case it should also have been validated by the author.
    --
    Gordon

    Report
  8. Craven Birds
    Archived post
    #8

    "Gordon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Craven Birds <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Sounds like they needed a proofreader!

    I wouldn't imagine a proof-reader would have spotted that mistake;-)


    Ironically - I think they would, assuming that the original draft was correct. My mate was a proof
    reader, and they have to be able to detach from what they are reading, and should spot an
    omission, which this apparently was.

    However, in this case it should also have been validated by the author.

    Validated by the author? Who would that be! How many magazines use a proof-reader nowadays? Not many
    due to computerisation of printing matter a different matter when it had to be type sett ;-)

    CB
    --
    Craven Birds

    Bird sightings based around 'Craven' Skipton, North Yorks.
    cravenbirds.mysite.freeserve.comcravenbirds.mysite.freeserve.com
    mysite.freeserve.comcravenbirds

    Report
  9. Stuart Mann
    Archived post
    #9

    "Craven Birds" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:


    "Gordon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Craven Birds <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    > Sounds like they needed a proofreader!

    I wouldn't imagine a proof-reader would have spotted that mistake;-)


    Ironically - I think they would, assuming that the original draft was correct. My mate was a
    proof reader, and they have to be able to detach from what they are reading, and should spot an
    omission, which this apparently was.

    However, in this case it should also have been validated by the author.

    Validated by the author? Who would that be! How many magazines use a proof-reader nowadays? Not
    many due to computerisation of printing matter a different matter when it had to be type sett ;-)


    Anyone who publishes safety-critical information should take all necessary steps to validate both
    the information and the process used to publish it. Computerisation increases the need for effective
    validation processes.

    Stuart

    Report
  10. Katherine
    Archived post
    #10
    Stuart Mann said:

    "Craven Birds" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    "Gordon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Craven Birds <[email hidden]> wrote

    >>Sounds like they needed a proofreader!
    >>
    >I wouldn't imagine a proof-reader would have spotted that mistake;-)
    >
    >
    Ironically - I think they would, assuming that the original draft was correct. My mate was a
    proof reader, and they have to be able to detach from what they are reading, and should spot an
    omission, which this apparently was.

    However, in this case it should also have been validated by the author.


    Validated by the author? Who would that be! How many magazines use a proof-reader nowadays? Not
    many due to computerisation of printing matter a different matter when it had to be type sett ;-)


    Anyone who publishes safety-critical information should take all necessary steps to validate both
    the information and the process used to publish it. Computerisation increases the need for
    effective validation processes.

    Stuart

    And using spell check isn't enough.

    Katherine

    Report
  11. Craven Birds
    Archived post
    #11

    "Stuart Mann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Craven Birds" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:


    "Gordon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Craven Birds <[email hidden]> wrote
    >
    >> Sounds like they needed a proofreader!
    >
    >I wouldn't imagine a proof-reader would have spotted that mistake;-)
    >
    Ironically - I think they would, assuming that the original draft was correct. My mate was a
    proof reader, and they have to be able to detach from what they are reading, and should spot an
    omission, which this apparently was.

    However, in this case it should also have been validated by the author.

    Validated by the author? Who would that be! How many magazines use a proof-reader nowadays?
    Not many due to computerisation of printing matter a different matter when it had to be type
    sett ;-)


    Anyone who publishes safety-critical information should take all necessary steps to validate both
    the information and the process used to publish it. Computerisation increases the need for
    effective validation processes.

    This subject has been blown up out of all proportion! Let me know when anyone drops over the edge,
    due to using information gleaned from this mag. With a distribution in the uk of about 1000 :-0

    CB
    --
    Craven Birds

    Bird sightings based around 'Craven' Skipton, North Yorks.
    cravenbirds.mysite.freeserve.comcravenbirds.mysite.freeserve.com
    mysite.freeserve.comcravenbirds

    Report
  12. Treefrog
    Archived post
    #12

    "Katherine" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Stuart Mann said:

    "Craven Birds" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    "Gordon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    >Craven Birds <[email hidden]> wrote
    >
    >>>Sounds like they needed a proofreader!
    >>>
    >>I wouldn't imagine a proof-reader would have spotted that mistake;-)
    >>
    >>
    >Ironically - I think they would, assuming that the original draft was correct. My mate was a
    >proof reader, and they have to be able to detach from what they are reading, and should spot an
    >omission, which this apparently was.
    >
    >However, in this case it should also have been validated by the author.
    >
    Validated by the author? Who would that be! How many magazines use a proof-reader nowadays?
    Not many due to computerisation of printing matter a different matter when it had to be type
    sett ;-)


    Anyone who publishes safety-critical information should take all


    necessary

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    steps to validate both the information and the process used to publish


    it.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Computerisation increases the need for effective validation processes.

    Stuart

    And using spell check isn't enough.

    That's it! They used MS word to write the article and the paper clip popped up with "I notice your
    trying to write a Ben Nevis summit guide, would you like Microsoft to complete it for you". Well,
    the poor fool must of clicked Ok. So, this is all Microsofts fault and not Trail mags. ;o)

    Report
  13. Gordon
    Archived post
    #13

    Stuart Mann <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Validated by the author? Who would that be! How many magazines use a proof-reader nowadays? Not
    many due to computerisation of printing matter a different matter when it had to be type sett ;-)


    Anyone who publishes safety-critical information should take all necessary steps to validate both
    the information and the process used to publish it. Computerisation increases the need for
    effective validation processes.

    Stuart


    The company my friend recently retired from was computerised way back, but still thought it worth
    while to employ him, and as Katherine said, it isn't just a matter of spell-checking, it has to
    match the original.

    If there was a mishap because of a less than professional magazine making such a dangerous error,
    the resultant corpse would want to know who to sue. ;-)

    I never trust walk descriptions from magazines without plotting the route on a map, because I have
    found them frequently misleading or plain wrong.
    --
    Gordon

    Report
  14. Gordon
    Archived post
    #14

    Paul Rooney <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Gordon said:


    I never trust walk descriptions from magazines without plotting the route on a map, because I have
    found them frequently misleading or plain wrong.

    And then there's those that give the length of the walk in hours.....


    That would be Gladys, in her South Pennines book. :-)
    --
    Gordon

    Report
  15. Paul Rooney
    Archived post
    #15

    On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:56:23 +0000, Gordon <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Stuart Mann <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Validated by the author? Who would that be! How many magazines use a proof-reader nowadays?
    Not many due to computerisation of printing matter a different matter when it had to be type
    sett ;-)


    Anyone who publishes safety-critical information should take all necessary steps to validate both
    the information and the process used to publish it. Computerisation increases the need for
    effective validation processes.

    Stuart


    The company my friend recently retired from was computerised way back, but still thought it worth
    while to employ him, and as Katherine said, it isn't just a matter of spell-checking, it has to
    match the original.

    If there was a mishap because of a less than professional magazine making such a dangerous error,
    the resultant corpse would want to know who to sue. ;-)

    I never trust walk descriptions from magazines without plotting the route on a map, because I have
    found them frequently misleading or plain wrong.

    And then there's those that give the length of the walk in hours.....

    --

    Paul

    My Lake District walking site (updated 29th September 2003):

    paulrooney.netfirms.compaulrooney.netfirms.com

    Report
  16. Paul Saunders
    Archived post
    #16
    Paul Rooney said:

    And then there's those that give the length of the walk in hours.....

    Pont Nedd Fechan to Sgwd Gwladus and return - 3 hours 22 minutes.

    Paul
    --
    Calendars for 2004
    wildwales.fsnet.co.ukcal.html
    wilderness-wales.co.ukwilderness-wales.co.uk
    photosig.comuserphotos

    Report
  17. Adrian Tupper
    Archived post
    #17

    Paul Rooney <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    And then there's those that give the length of the walk in hours.....

    250m ascent in 40 mins. 250m descent in 20 mins. Add to that the time for any walk-ins and
    ridges. Try it.

    --
    Adrian

    Report
  18. Ian Dainty
    Archived post
    #18

    "Paul Saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Pont Nedd Fechan to Sgwd Gwladus and return - 3 hours 22 minutes.

    Paul

    Troll alert.

    Ian.

    --
    Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - mailgate.orgmailgate.org

    Report
  19. Craven Birds
    Archived post
    #19

    --
    Craven Birds

    Bird sightings based around 'Craven' Skipton, North Yorks. cravenbirds.mysite.freeserve.comcravenbirds.mysite.freeserve.com
    mysite.freeserve.comcravenbirds

    "Adrian Tupper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Paul Rooney <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    And then there's those that give the length of the walk in hours.....

    250m ascent in 40 mins. 250m descent in 20 mins. Add to that the time for any walk-ins and
    ridges. Try it.

    Didn't work for me on Mont Blanc :-0

    --
    Craven Birds

    Bird sightings based around 'Craven' Skipton, North Yorks. cravenbirds.mysite.freeserve.comcravenbirds.mysite.freeserve.com
    mysite.freeserve.comcravenbirds

    Report
  20. Paul Saunders
    Archived post
    #20
    Gordon said:

    That would be Gladys, in her South Pennines book. :-)

    Any relation to Sgwd?

    Paul
    --
    Calendars for 2004
    wildwales.fsnet.co.ukcal.html
    wilderness-wales.co.ukwilderness-wales.co.uk
    photosig.comuserphotos

    Report

Related discussions

Closely matching published threads from General fitness, health and nutrition.

01Ooops again! 7 replies · 169 views02Oops, I did it again... 75 replies · 523 views03Unbagging Groceries Oops. 82 replies · 605 views04Re: Unbagging Groceries Oops. 0 replies · 159 views05Tapioca pearls--OOPS 5 replies · 352 views06Oops! This time with recipe! Recipe: "Sauteed" Mushrooms in Dehydrator 4 replies · 235 views

Keep exploring

Browse the sectionGeneral fitness, health and nutrition Return to CyclingForumsStart at the home page Search discussionsFind another thread

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.