General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

normal ranges non-diabetes

Started by cecelia · · Last activity · 6 posts · 1,420 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 January 2004
Last activity
13 January 2004
Original author
cecelia
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,420
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Can anyone tell me what the normal ranges is for BG in a non-diabetic? Say the normal fasting
    levels, and the range for after meals? Thanks.

    margo

  2. This may offer some info

    diabetesuk.co.uknewdiagnotic.htm

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:kkSvb.14630$f7.717691@localhost...

    Quoted message said:

    Can anyone tell me what the normal ranges is for BG in a non-diabetic? Say the normal fasting
    levels, and the range for after meals? Thanks.

    margo

  3. Quoted message said:

    Can anyone tell me what the normal ranges is for BG in a non-diabetic? Say the normal fasting
    levels, and the range for after meals? Thanks.

    margo

    Here you go:

    Fasting: Under 100 1 hour post meals: Under 140 2 hours post meals: Under 120

  4. [email hidden] wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:

    Can anyone tell me what the normal ranges is for BG in a non-diabetic? Say the normal fasting
    levels, and the range for after meals? Thanks.

    margo

    A normal, non-diabetic has a glucose regulatory system which tries to keep their bG at about 85
    mg/dL (4.7 mmol/L)

    The regulation is not perfect, nor ultra-fast in responding to meals and exercise but the younger
    and healthier you are, the better it is.

    I have a standing offer to test my friends for abnormal sugar with my home testing meter. I try to
    test them at what should be the highest point of their day, two hours after a meal (and I usually
    give them candy to kick it up a notch). I have never observed any of my friends above 100 mg/dL. The
    last one was 88 mg/dL. My wife (an old person, like me) is in the low 90's every time despite a diet
    which would reduce many diabetics to tears.

    The further you deviate from 85 mg/dL, the closer you are to "diabetes"

    Diabetes is not a simple medical condition which can be detected almost as if it had an on-off
    switch. It is characterized by destruction of the beta cells which produce insulin. The more
    destruction one has, the more erratic their bG. The doctors "draw a line in the sand". They
    establish an arbitrary levels of blood sugars which formally define the existence of the disease, or
    the existence of arbitrary conditions called impaired glucose tolerance, or impaired fasting glucose
    or pre-diabetes.

    On average, a T2 diabetic suffers damage to their beta cells for 10 years before their sugar control
    reaches the level of instability which the doctors currently define as "Diabetic". . .(hmmm. . .or
    was that according to last year's line in the sand?). Aggressive doctors could draw their own lines
    and treat folks as diabetic at any time during those 10 years.

    Good thing that you're interested. There's a sneaky way to avoid or at least delay the whole issue
    if you catch it early. They have proven in co ntrolled clinical trials that changes in lifestyle
    which include:

    a. Losing fat lb
    b. Gaining muscle lb
    c. Exercising vigorously every day.

    will delay the onset of the disease. Many smart folks believe that

    d. Rationing your carb intake, eating slowly-digesting carbs, and spreading your total daily
    carb over several small meals during the day will also help.

    Type 2 diabetes is a genetic condition Keep coming back if you suspect you have the genes. Paying
    attention to our experiences can lead to a longer, more pleasant life for you.

    Regards
    Old Al

  5. Al, nice post.

    "oldal4865" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]-
    berlin.de>...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:

    Can anyone tell me what the normal ranges is for BG in a non-diabetic? Say the normal fasting
    levels, and the range for after meals? Thanks.

    margo

    A normal, non-diabetic has a glucose regulatory system which tries to keep their bG at about 85
    mg/dL (4.7 mmol/L)

    The regulation is not perfect, nor ultra-fast in responding to meals and exercise but the younger
    and healthier you are, the better it is.

    I have a standing offer to test my friends for abnormal sugar with my home testing meter. I try to
    test them at what should be the highest point of their day, two hours after a meal (and I usually
    give them candy to kick it up a notch). I have never observed any of my friends above 100 mg/dL.
    The last one was 88 mg/dL. My wife (an old person, like me) is in the low 90's every time despite
    a diet which would reduce many diabetics to tears.

    The further you deviate from 85 mg/dL, the closer you are to "diabetes"

    Diabetes is not a simple medical condition which can be detected almost as if it had an on-off
    switch. It is characterized by destruction of the beta cells which produce insulin. The more
    destruction one has, the more erratic their bG. The doctors "draw a line in the sand". They
    establish an arbitrary levels of blood sugars which formally define the existence of the disease,
    or the existence of arbitrary conditions called impaired glucose tolerance, or impaired fasting
    glucose or pre-diabetes.

    On average, a T2 diabetic suffers damage to their beta cells for 10 years before their sugar
    control reaches the level of instability which the doctors currently define as "Diabetic". .
    .(hmmm. . .or was that according to last year's line in the sand?). Aggressive doctors could draw
    their own lines and treat folks as diabetic at any time during those 10 years.

    Good thing that you're interested. There's a sneaky way to avoid or at least delay the whole issue
    if you catch it early. They have proven in co ntrolled clinical trials that changes in lifestyle
    which include:

    a. Losing fat lb
    b. Gaining muscle lb
    c. Exercising vigorously every day.

    will delay the onset of the disease. Many smart folks believe that

    d. Rationing your carb intake, eating slowly-digesting carbs, and spreading your total daily
    carb over several small meals during the day will also help.

    Type 2 diabetes is a genetic condition Keep coming back if you suspect you have the genes. Paying
    attention to our experiences can lead to a longer, more pleasant life for you.

    Regards
    Old Al

  6. On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 08:37:19 -0500, "oldal4865" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    [email hidden] wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:

    Can anyone tell me what the normal ranges is for BG in a non-diabetic? Say the normal fasting
    levels, and the range for after meals? Thanks.

    margo

    A normal, non-diabetic has a glucose regulatory system which tries to

    <more good advice snipped>

    When I first joined this ng as a scared newly diagnosed Type 2 I opened a seperate folder in "My
    Documents" for good advice worth reading again and again.

    I found I had to add a few sub-folders for some special posters Like Jennifer, Dr Biggs and a
    few others.

    I think I'm going to have to start cataloguing and indexing Old Al's folder. It's getting too full.

    Thanks Al

    Cheers Alan, T2, Oz dx May 2002 , no meds, diet and not enough exercise.
    --
    Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.