Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
No matter what clothing option you choose, you still are well below your goal weight. Congratulations on keeping everything under control through the first step of the holiday season.
Joyce
Fred said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
I don't think I am going to beat 158.4, so you get this week too. However, one of these days I am going to get to my Actual goal weight of 155, so ....
🙂🙂🙂 Good going, only 1.4 after a major meal. Very very good.
"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
Sorry about the gain this week, Fred, but at least when you change to your winter wardrobe, you know that you will get that loss back again in the spring. As long as you're below your goal & don't have to pay, it's OK ;-D Elaine K 331.4/213./179
Fred said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
Sorry about the gain but it wasn't much considering Thanksgiving was in there!!! I have to say I can't wait until the day a 1.4 pound gain still keeps me under goal!! Way to stay below your goal-- you're doing a great job!!!
-- Janice 263/256.25/150 (maybe 130)
"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
I can't keep track anymore who's under and who's on top. No matter. You're still well below goal, you celebrated Thanksgiving and your BBS friendships, and you (along with your cohorts in comedy) are keeping the entire NG in stitches. Keep up the great work.
Prairie Roots
Fred said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
Sorry about the little gain Fred, but you're still under goal and that's great! Gee if the place was empty, why didn't you weigh naked? -- Brenda 209/173/150 NYNY goal 160
"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
Ho Hum.. I don't attend meetings anymore - but I used to wear the same outfit religiously all year - whatever the weather! Boy did I ever get cold weighing in in January!
-- krys
UK 157/135.8/126 Started March 1st 2001 GOAL August 16th 2001 struggling now.......
"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
good either way if you ask me, Lee Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
Maybe I will just become more of a hermit and not accept any invitations to any parties. (g)
Joyce said:
No matter what clothing option you choose, you still are well below your goal weight. Congratulations on keeping everything under control through the first step of the holiday season.
Joyce
Fred said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
I don't think I am going to beat 158.4, so you get this week too. However, one of these days I am going to get to my Actual goal weight of 155, so ....
🙂🙂🙂 Good going, only 1.4 after a major meal. Very very good.
"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
Oh, not really a problem this time. There was Thanksgiving and a breakfast with friends. And, yes, the issue is staying Lifetime and not having to pay and so I have what I need - my coveted "clothing cushion."
Thanks
Elaine Kirkham said:
Sorry about the gain this week, Fred, but at least when you change to your winter wardrobe, you know that you will get that loss back again in the spring. As long as you're below your goal & don't have to pay, it's OK ;-D Elaine K 331.4/213./179
Fred said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
Thanks - well, it really does help to be a bit below goal which is probably why some of us set our goal at the TOP of the WW range. A group of us here have realized that there is not such thing a ONE STEADY WEIGHT. There are normal variations based on how much "bulk" you have left over from the day before's foods, water retention due to exercise or salt or women's period, etc. So up and down from week to week is something that just will happen. Anyone who can stay exactly the same week to week is not normal. So below goal is really the only way to actually be AT GOAL and Maintain LIFETIME.
Janice Kennish said:
Fred,
Sorry about the gain but it wasn't much considering Thanksgiving was in there!!! I have to say I can't wait until the day a 1.4 pound gain still keeps me under goal!! Way to stay below your goal-- you're doing a great job!!!
Thanks and thanks for the chuckles you just provided, too. (G)
And this week I finally got a handle on clothing weights, too. I'm set as long as I keep to the program. And since I am enjoying the current me, I am hoping that staying with the program will just be fine since the outcome is so damn acceptable.
Prairie Roots said:
I can't keep track anymore who's under and who's on top. No matter. You're still well below goal, you celebrated Thanksgiving and your BBS friendships, and you (along with your cohorts in comedy) are keeping the entire NG in stitches. Keep up the great work.
Prairie Roots
Fred said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
Ho Hum.. I don't attend meetings anymore - but I used to wear the same outfit religiously all year - whatever the weather! Boy did I ever get cold weighing in in January!
Oh, I will eventually get to the 155. Consider that it took me from 1981 to this past August to get from my highest weight to my WW goal....
"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
YES!!!!!!!!! (g)
We shall see. (g)
Lesanne said:
I don't think I am going to beat 158.4, so you get this week too. However, one of these days I am going to get to my Actual goal weight of 155, so ....
🙂🙂🙂 Good going, only 1.4 after a major meal. Very very good.
"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
Yup, I have fallen behind with the newsgroup - managed to pop in here for a few minutes while I caught my breath from the afternoon running.
Quoted message said:
Maybe I will just become more of a hermit and not accept any invitations to any parties. (g)
Yeah, sure - like THAT'S gonna happen. <G>
Joyce
Quoted message said:
Joyce said:
No matter what clothing option you choose, you still are well below your goal weight. Congratulations on keeping everything under control through the first step of the holiday season.
Joyce
Fred said:
Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I weighed 160.0
Fred 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
