NYNY - Fred - Dec 3rd

you could never bore me - such scintillating wit is always entrancing *grin*

i merely meant ho hum as in - d*rn for the weight loss but ho hum, life carries on.... 🙂

--
krys

UK 157/135.8/126 Started March 1st 2001 GOAL August 16th 2001 struggling now.......

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sorry to bore you (g)

krys said:

Ho Hum.. I don't attend meetings anymore - but I used to wear the same outfit religiously all
year - whatever the weather! Boy did I ever get

cold

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

weighing in in January!

I think you will make it, too. But that's what I'm now heading toward if it seems possible so I
ain't letting you get ahead of me just yet
(G). But with my up/down fluctuations it might not be either possible or comfortable.

Lesanne said:

Oh, I will eventually get to the 155. Consider that it took me from 1981 to this past August to get
from my highest weight to my WW goal....

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

YES!!!!!!!!! (g)

We shall see. (g)

Lesanne said:

I don't think I am going to beat 158.4, so you get this week too. However, one of these days I
am going to get to my Actual goal weight of 155, so ....

🙂🙂🙂 Good going, only 1.4 after a major meal. Very very good.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
> Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
>
> What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer
> wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on
> clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount
> shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
>
> So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
>
> The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
>
> The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I
> weighed 160.0
>
>
> Fred
> 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
>

Actually, other than the work lunch, no one has mentioned Xmas yet - well, the orphan's dinner (all
those folks who moved here from elsewhere) which has been happening with friends now for 30 years.
That's always xmas day.

Joyce said:

Fred said:

Thanks.

Boy, you and Lesanne were in here fast! (G)

Yup, I have fallen behind with the newsgroup - managed to pop in here for a few minutes while I
caught my breath from the afternoon running.

Quoted message said:

Maybe I will just become more of a hermit and not accept any invitations to any parties. (g)

Yeah, sure - like THAT'S gonna happen. <G>

Joyce

Quoted message said:

Joyce said:

No matter what clothing option you choose, you still are well below your goal weight.
Congratulations on keeping everything under control through the first step of the holiday season.

Joyce

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:02:06 -0800, Fred <[email hidden]> wrote:

>Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
>
>What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer
>wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing
>weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below.
>Too anal - probably! (G)
>
>So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
>
>The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
>
>The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I
>weighed 160.0
>
>
>Fred
>219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Funny you should mention Cinnabon. The woman who developed their deadly cinnamon roll had a
restaurant north of here that was a very popular bicycling destination and many of us would eat the
cinnamon rolls. She sold the restaurant and then apparently went on to create the cinnabon roll. I
do forget how many calories and fat grams on in those things. A one way up and back to the
restaurant was 26 miles or so and the loop was about 37 miles. So maybe the roll was acceptable and
not knowing its values made it safer (G)

Lesanne said:

This is so true. My leader set her goal at the top, and did not go under it. She is always on
probation or something because she is a pound or two over when any holiday hits, or other stuff,
like when the cinnabon opened their first place here and her husband found it.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Thanks - well, it really does help to be a bit below goal which is probably why some of us set
our goal at the TOP of the WW range. A group of us here have realized that there is not such
thing a ONE STEADY WEIGHT. There are normal variations based on how much "bulk" you have left
over from the day before's foods, water retention due to exercise or salt or women's period, etc.
So up and down from week to week is something that just will happen. Anyone who can stay exactly
the same week to week is not normal. So below goal is really the only way to actually be AT GOAL
and Maintain LIFETIME.

Janice Kennish said:

Fred,

Sorry about the gain but it wasn't much considering Thanksgiving was in there!!! I have to say I
can't wait until the day a 1.4 pound gain still keeps me under goal!! Way to stay below your goal--
you're doing a great job!!!

I may have figured it out but straying is always too possible.

Prairie Roots said:

Fred said:

I'm set as long as I keep to the program.

Huh! And here I was thinking you'd figured this out already. <G>

Prairie Roots
232/175/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

Oh, yes you would! (G)

Brenda Hammond said:

Maybe it is a good thing that you have that clothing allowance then. Wouldn't want you arrested for
indecent exposure!

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

That's enough from the northerly contingent! (G)

It was not quite empty and my leader probably would have me arrested.

Brenda Hammond said:

Sorry about the little gain Fred, but you're still under goal and that's great! Gee if the place
was empty, why didn't you weigh naked?

Well, it was a weight GAIN (sniff) but yes, life carries on.

krys said:

you could never bore me - such scintillating wit is always entrancing *grin*

i merely meant ho hum as in - d*rn for the weight loss but ho hum, life carries on.... 🙂

from the way the ladies talked about the pictures the exposure would be more
than decent, Lee, running fast
Brenda Hammond <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Maybe it is a good thing that you have that clothing allowance then. Wouldn't want you arrested
for indecent exposure!

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

That's enough from the northerly contingent! (G)

It was not quite empty and my leader probably would have me arrested.

Brenda Hammond said:

Sorry about the little gain Fred, but you're still under goal and

that's

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

great! Gee if the place was empty, why didn't you weigh naked?

Yeah, fast and "lose" (G)

Lesanne said:

I get to jump on and off all day long, cause of my work at home status. We are just Fast women
these days, right Joyce??

"Joyce" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 13:46:18 -0800, Fred <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Thanks.

Boy, you and Lesanne were in here fast! (G)

Yup, I have fallen behind with the newsgroup - managed to pop in here for

a few

Quoted message said:

minutes while I caught my breath from the afternoon running.

Quoted message said:

Maybe I will just become more of a hermit and not accept any invitations to any parties. (g)

Yeah, sure - like THAT'S gonna happen. <G>

Joyce

Quoted message said:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:23:34 -0600, Joyce <[email hidden]> wrote:

>No matter what clothing option you choose, you still are well below your

goal

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>weight. Congratulations on keeping everything under control through the

first

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>step of the holiday season.
>
>Joyce
>
>
>On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:02:06 -0800, Fred <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>
>>Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
>>
>>What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer
>>wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on
>>clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount
>>shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
>>
>>So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
>>
>>The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
>>
>>The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I
>>weighed 160.0
>>
>>
>>Fred
>>219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

I think they have like 40 points a piece or something. I have never tried one. Not going to either.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Funny you should mention Cinnabon. The woman who developed their deadly cinnamon roll had a
restaurant north of here that was a very popular bicycling destination and many of us would eat
the cinnamon rolls. She sold the restaurant and then apparently went on to create the cinnabon
roll. I do forget how many calories and fat grams on in those things. A one way up and back to the
restaurant was 26 miles or so and the loop was about 37 miles. So maybe the roll was acceptable
and not knowing its values made it safer (G)

Lesanne said:

This is so true. My leader set her goal at the top, and did not go under it. She is always on
probation or something because she is a pound or

two

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

over when any holiday hits, or other stuff, like when the cinnabon opened their first place here
and her husband found it.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Thanks - well, it really does help to be a bit below goal which is probably why some of us set
our goal at the TOP of the WW range. A group of us here have realized that there is not such
thing a ONE STEADY WEIGHT. There are normal variations based on how much "bulk" you have left
over from the day before's foods, water retention due to exercise or salt or women's period,
etc. So up and down from week to week is something that just will happen. Anyone who can stay
exactly the same week to week is not normal. So below goal is really the only way to actually
be AT GOAL and Maintain LIFETIME.

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 01:21:19 GMT, "Janice Kennish" <[email hidden]> wrote:

>Fred,
>
>Sorry about the gain but it wasn't much considering Thanksgiving was

in

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>there!!! I have to say I can't wait until the day a 1.4 pound gain

still

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>keeps me under goal!! Way to stay below your goal--you're doing a

great

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>job!!!

Ah, yes! I find that this kind of self talk helps to drown out the other kind.

Fred said:

I may have figured it out but straying is always too possible.

Prairie Roots said:

Fred said:

I'm set as long as I keep to the program.

Huh! And here I was thinking you'd figured this out already. <G>

Prairie Roots
232/175/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

Prairie Roots
232/175/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

Well, I'll admit, the thought of an indecent picture sounds kind of interesting.... When are you
posting pics for us again????

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Oh, yes you would! (G)

Brenda Hammond said:

Maybe it is a good thing that you have that clothing allowance then. Wouldn't want you arrested
for indecent exposure!

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

That's enough from the northerly contingent! (G)

It was not quite empty and my leader probably would have me arrested.

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:31:50 -0800, "Brenda Hammond" <[email hidden]> wrote:

>Sorry about the little gain Fred, but you're still under goal and

that's

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>great! Gee if the place was empty, why didn't you weigh naked?

tee hee

"Miss Violette" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

from the way the ladies talked about the pictures the exposure would be

more

Quoted message said:

than decent, Lee, running fast Brenda Hammond <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Maybe it is a good thing that you have that clothing allowance then. Wouldn't want you arrested
for indecent exposure!

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

That's enough from the northerly contingent! (G)

It was not quite empty and my leader probably would have me arrested.

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:31:50 -0800, "Brenda Hammond" <[email hidden]> wrote:

>Sorry about the little gain Fred, but you're still under goal and

that's

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>great! Gee if the place was empty, why didn't you weigh naked?

Free is good - it is very good.

Lesanne said:

Well you can figure that I am in it for the long haul, as long as I can go to meetings FREE like we
can (GIANT G) I figure I can spend the Next 20 years if I want getting that last 5 off. !

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I think you will make it, too. But that's what I'm now heading toward if it seems possible so I
ain't letting you get ahead of me just yet
(G). But with my up/down fluctuations it might not be either possible or comfortable.

Lesanne said:

Oh, I will eventually get to the 155. Consider that it took me from 1981

to

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

this past August to get from my highest weight to my WW goal....

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
> YES!!!!!!!!! (g)
>
> We shall see. (g)
>
>
>
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 21:41:22 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >I don't think I am going to beat 158.4, so you get this week too. However, one of these days
> >I am going to get to my Actual goal weight

of

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >155, so ....
> >
> >🙂🙂🙂 Good going, only 1.4 after a major meal. Very very good.
> >
> >
> >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> >"]news:[email hidden]...
> >> Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
> >>
> >> What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my
> >> warmer wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off

a

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> major drop. Or using the new information on clothing weight, I

could

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount

shown

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> below. Too anal - probably! (G)
> >>
> >> So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
> >>
> >> The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
> >>
> >> The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I
> >> weighed 160.0
> >>
> >>
> >> Fred
> >> 219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002
> >>
> >
>

Well, I've never had one either - at Cinnabon. Once I read the article about them even though I was
not on WW or even watching, I decided that they were completely UNhealthy and that while I ate all
kinds of other [censored], that was not going to be added to the list.

Now I have had cinnamon rolls on occasion altho, possibly not since starting WW. And I may again,
but not the SINabon ones (G)

Lesanne said:

I think they have like 40 points a piece or something. I have never tried one. Not going to either.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Funny you should mention Cinnabon. The woman who developed their deadly cinnamon roll had a
restaurant north of here that was a very popular bicycling destination and many of us would eat
the cinnamon rolls. She sold the restaurant and then apparently went on to create the cinnabon
roll. I do forget how many calories and fat grams on in those things. A one way up and back to
the restaurant was 26 miles or so and the loop was about 37 miles. So maybe the roll was
acceptable and not knowing its values made it safer (G)

Lesanne said:

This is so true. My leader set her goal at the top, and did not go under it. She is always on
probation or something because she is a pound or

two

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

over when any holiday hits, or other stuff, like when the cinnabon opened their first place here
and her husband found it.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
> Thanks - well, it really does help to be a bit below goal which is probably why some of us set
> our goal at the TOP of the WW range. A group of us here have realized that there is not such
> thing a ONE STEADY WEIGHT. There are normal variations based on how much "bulk" you have left
> over from the day before's foods, water retention due to exercise or salt or women's period,
> etc. So up and down from week to week is something that just will happen. Anyone who can stay
> exactly the same week to week is not normal. So below goal is really the only way to actually
> be AT GOAL and Maintain LIFETIME.
>
> On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 01:21:19 GMT, "Janice Kennish" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >Fred,
> >
> >Sorry about the gain but it wasn't much considering Thanksgiving was

in

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >there!!! I have to say I can't wait until the day a 1.4 pound gain

still

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >keeps me under goal!! Way to stay below your goal--you're doing a

great

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >job!!!
>

I have a good one of me in bicycling shorts and no shirt but I can just imagine the hullabalu it
would create so I do NOT think so.

Brenda Hammond said:

Well, I'll admit, the thought of an indecent picture sounds kind of interesting.... When are you
posting pics for us again????

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Oh, yes you would! (G)

Brenda Hammond said:

Maybe it is a good thing that you have that clothing allowance then. Wouldn't want you arrested
for indecent exposure!

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
> That's enough from the northerly contingent! (G)
>
> It was not quite empty and my leader probably would have me arrested.
>
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:31:50 -0800, "Brenda Hammond" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >Sorry about the little gain Fred, but you're still under goal and

that's

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >great! Gee if the place was empty, why didn't you weigh naked?
>

chicken, Lee
Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I have a good one of me in bicycling shorts and no shirt but I can just imagine the hullabalu it
would create so I do NOT think so.

Brenda Hammond said:

Well, I'll admit, the thought of an indecent picture sounds kind of interesting.... When are you
posting pics for us again????

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Oh, yes you would! (G)

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 06:16:20 -0800, "Brenda Hammond" <[email hidden]> wrote:

>Maybe it is a good thing that you have that clothing allowance then. Wouldn't want you
>arrested for indecent exposure!
>
>"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>"]news:[email hidden]...
>> That's enough from the northerly contingent! (G)
>>
>> It was not quite empty and my leader probably would have me

arrested.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>>
>> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:31:50 -0800, "Brenda Hammond" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> >Sorry about the little gain Fred, but you're still under goal and

that's

Quoted message said:

>> >great! Gee if the place was empty, why didn't you weigh naked?
>>
>

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:49:26 GMT, "Lesanne" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

*! *! *! *! *! *! *! *! *! speechless *!

That will be the day! (G)

Quoted message said:

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I have a good one of me in bicycling shorts and no shirt but I can just imagine the hullabalu it
would create so I do NOT think so.

Brenda Hammond said:

Well, I'll admit, the thought of an indecent picture sounds kind of interesting.... When are you
posting pics for us again????

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
> Oh, yes you would! (G)
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 06:16:20 -0800, "Brenda Hammond" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >Maybe it is a good thing that you have that clothing allowance then. Wouldn't want you
> >arrested for indecent exposure!
> >
> >"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> >"]news:[email hidden]...
> >> That's enough from the northerly contingent! (G)
> >>
> >> It was not quite empty and my leader probably would have me

arrested.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >>
> >> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:31:50 -0800, "Brenda Hammond" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Sorry about the little gain Fred, but you're still under goal and
that's
> >> >great! Gee if the place was empty, why didn't you weigh naked?
> >>
> >
>

hehehe, usually fast! I am very slow this week, haven't been home much and when I am I haven't been
doing much jumping. Watch out for the speed again next week.
<G>

Am heading off to bed right NOW ... before I get carried away and don't make it at all.

Joyce

Lesanne said:

I get to jump on and off all day long, cause of my work at home status. We are just Fast women
these days, right Joyce??

"Joyce" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 13:46:18 -0800, Fred <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Thanks.

Boy, you and Lesanne were in here fast! (G)

Yup, I have fallen behind with the newsgroup - managed to pop in here for

a few

Quoted message said:

minutes while I caught my breath from the afternoon running.

Quoted message said:

Maybe I will just become more of a hermit and not accept any invitations to any parties. (g)

Yeah, sure - like THAT'S gonna happen. <G>

Joyce

Quoted message said:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:23:34 -0600, Joyce <[email hidden]> wrote:

>No matter what clothing option you choose, you still are well below your

goal

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>weight. Congratulations on keeping everything under control through the

first

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>step of the holiday season.
>
>Joyce
>
>
>On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:02:06 -0800, Fred <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>
>>Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
>>
>>What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer
>>wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on
>>clothing weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount
>>shown below. Too anal - probably! (G)
>>
>>So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
>>
>>The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
>>
>>The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I
>>weighed 160.0
>>
>>
>>Fred
>>219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Ya know, not much has been mentioned here either. I finally tackled the family today to get plans
nailed down - need to know what direction I am moving mom in. So Christmas Eve will be at my oldest
girls home (pizza and mosticolli), Christmas breakfast at my house, and Christmas dinner at MIL's
house. I do think it will all be easily survivable though. I am expecting some damage is already
done, just from this last weeks craziness. And my youngest girl already has next weekend pinned down
for fudge and cookie making. Just when I thought I had been able to keep the stuff out of the house.
Oh well .........

Joyce

Fred said:

Actually, other than the work lunch, no one has mentioned Xmas yet - well, the orphan's dinner (all
those folks who moved here from elsewhere) which has been happening with friends now for 30 years.
That's always xmas day.

Joyce said:

Fred said:

Thanks.

Boy, you and Lesanne were in here fast! (G)

Yup, I have fallen behind with the newsgroup - managed to pop in here for a few minutes while I
caught my breath from the afternoon running.

Quoted message said:

Maybe I will just become more of a hermit and not accept any invitations to any parties. (g)

Yeah, sure - like THAT'S gonna happen. <G>

Joyce

Quoted message said:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:23:34 -0600, Joyce <[email hidden]> wrote:

>No matter what clothing option you choose, you still are well below your goal weight.
>Congratulations on keeping everything under control through the first step of the holiday
>season.
>
>Joyce
>
>
>On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:02:06 -0800, Fred <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>Okay, it was up as expected but it was quiet enough (empty) that I could WI twice (G)
>>
>>What this means is that I will definitely be UP next week if I use their numbers and my warmer
>>wardrobe unless I simulaneously pull off a major drop. Or using the new information on clothing
>>weight, I could recalculate a "constant" weight by always subtracting the amount shown below.
>>Too anal - probably! (G)
>>
>>So (drumroll) the numbers this week are .....
>>
>>The usual wardrobe (shorts and T-shirt): 158.4 Gain: 1.4
>>
>>The winter wardrobe weighed 1.6 pounds more and included jeans and a turtleneck shirt and I
>>weighed 160.0
>>
>>
>>Fred
>>219.2/158.4/164. (Lifetime) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002