Professional Cycling · Public discussion

Doping Fatigue

Started by Ted B · · Last activity · 5 posts · 1,068 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Professional Cycling
Published
14 July 2010
Last activity
15 July 2010
Original author
Ted B
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,068
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I feel that timing doping scandals to coincide with the TdF is detrimental to the credibility of the sport and public interest. These things quickly degrade to a he-said, she-said affair of fingerpointing and nothing else, simply because they mostly deal with events that happened long ago. I'm just sick and tired of hearing about it.

    At this point, I am of the opinion that many more than not throughout the past 25 years that I've kept up with the sport have used banned substances at one time or another. Some will be caught, some will confess, others will forever keep their secrets to themselves. At this point, most of this is now so far after the fact that I no longer care. So many have either been caught or confessed (Riis, Ullrich, Pantani, etc. and so forth) that I can't imagine all the asterisks that would have to be added to the history books. For all I know, Pantani had a big snort of cocaine halfway up the Ventoux years ago, and I wouldn't care if he did at this point (not that anyone could prove it one way or another in 2010). Whenever I watch Lemond struggle in video clips of his later years, I can't help but wonder if he was losing his edge at least partly because of widespread EPO users. My understanding is that even Fignon admits to some naughty doing in his book, so nothing in the past seems verifiably clean.

    If anything positive can come of this tabloid grade noise, I hope it demonstrates that the cats hold the upper hand in the cat and mouse game. So far, there have been no positive drug test in this TdF, and that's all I care about at this point. As for what he did or she did years ago, I just don't give a damn so long after the fact and wish it would all evaporate.

  2. Ted B said:

    I feel that timing doping scandals to coincide with the TdF is detrimental to the credibility of the sport and public interest. These things quickly degrade to a he-said, she-said affair of fingerpointing and nothing else, simply because they mostly deal with events that happened long ago. I'm just sick and tired of hearing about it.

    At this point, I am of the opinion that many more than not throughout the past 25 years that I've kept up with the sport have used banned substances at one time or another. Some will be caught, some will confess, others will forever keep their secrets to themselves. At this point, most of this is now so far after the fact that I no longer care. So many have either been caught or confessed (Riis, Ullrich, Pantani, etc. and so forth) that I can't imagine all the asterisks that would have to be added to the history books. For all I know, Pantani had a big snort of cocaine halfway up the Ventoux years ago, and I wouldn't care if he did at this point (not that anyone could prove it one way or another in 2010). Whenever I watch Lemond struggle in video clips of his later years, I can't help but wonder if he was losing his edge at least partly because of widespread EPO users. My understanding is that even Fignon admits to some naughty doing in his book, so nothing in the past seems verifiably clean.

    If anything positive can come of this tabloid grade noise, I hope it demonstrates that the cats hold the upper hand in the cat and mouse game. So far, there have been no positive drug test in this TdF, and that's all I care about at this point. As for what he did or she did years ago, I just don't give a damn so long after the fact and wish it would all evaporate.

    I'm with you Ted B. I'm sick to my gills with all the doping allogations coming up now when they should have gained attention years ago. I understand your point; lets just hear the accusations when the cycling season is over. Personally my cycling season (spectating), to nobody's fault inparticular, is over. I don't care what happens in the the Tour, Vuelta or any other race of record. My off season debate is whether I will care the next year and I usually do care up until a point like today. What has happened in the past, is ruining cycling, for me. Perhaps today's cycling events will even futher ruin cycling if it turns out AC, AS or any other cyclist has one this year's tour while using PED's

    I watched today's stage and it seemed like such a shame that on a day that a young cyclist like Paulinho, who had nothing to do with the years in question at USPS was overshadowed by his teams history, accurate or incaccurate.

  3. I feel that doping is detrimental to the credibility of the sport and public interest.

  4. In the end it really does come down to perception, doesn't it?
    Some stand behind their truth others hide behind their deception.
    It was a lot easier when all the good guys wore white hats.

  5. In the end it really does come down to perception, doesn't it?
    Some stand behind their truth others hide behind their deception.
    It was a lot easier when all the good guys wore white hats.[LEFT]

    [/LEFT]

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 3 guests ·0 bots ·3 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.