Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

My new frame

Started by Peter@vecchios · · Last activity · 18 posts · 1,569 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
21 March 2008
Last activity
24 March 2008
Original author
Peter@vecchios
Posts
18
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,569
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–18 of 18
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Comes today, pix taken before ship-too pretty for me!!

    http://waterfordbikes.com/now/modelthis.php?blobid=595&bwid=199

    953 tubes-my, they did a nice job-I'll report on how it rides. Not my first steel bicycle, but maybe my last!!

  2. Peter@vecchios said:

    Comes today, pix taken before ship-too pretty for me!!

    waterfordbikes.commodelthis.php

    953 tubes-my, they did a nice job-I'll report on how it rides. Not my first steel bicycle, but maybe my last!!

    Very nice ...

    BUT, you might have to give a BROOKS saddle another try!

    The B17 "standard" is wider than the Professional/Swift/Swallow saddles ... for cosmetic reasons, I would suggest one with the larger, hammered, copper rivets.

    Despite what Grant Peterson recommends, the initial setup should be with the rails perfectly horizontal ... that will provide a shallow "shelf" upon which you can sit if you set the saddle's fore-aft so that your sitbones are over the area encompassed by the rivets.

    I do NOT recommend Proofide ... SnoSeal is subjectively better & definitely less expensive AND SnoSeal doesn't have any "fragrance" + can be buffed to a high gloss (or, not) if that is your preference.

  3. That is one sweet looking frameset.

    Enjoy it!!!

  4. Beautiful! I love the head tube lugs.

  5. Peter@vecchios said:

    Comes today, pix taken before ship-too pretty for me!!

    http://waterfordbikes.com/now/modelthis.php?blobid=595&bwid=199

    953 tubes-my, they did a nice job-I'll report on how it rides. Not my first steel bicycle, but maybe my last!!


    A classic looking beauty.
    What is the wall thickness: center & ends?
    I love the looks and ride of Waterford!... I just can't afford one.

  6. Molto bella. Enjoy it! And ride the heck out of it!

  7. alfeng said:

    Very nice ...

    BUT, you might have to give a BROOKS saddle another try!

    The B17 "standard" is wider than the Professional/Swift/Swallow saddles ... for cosmetic reasons, I would suggest one with the larger, hammered, copper rivets.

    Despite what Grant Peterson recommends, the initial setup should be with the rails perfectly horizontal ... that will provide a shallow "shelf" upon which you can sit if you set the saddle's fore-aft so that your sitbones are over the area encompassed by the rivets.

    I do NOT recommend Proofide ... SnoSeal is subjectively better & definitely less expensive AND SnoSeal doesn't have any "fragrance" + can be buffed to a high gloss (or, not) if that is your preference.

    No Brooks for me..tried twice and I am very happy with SSM Rolls, plus it looks great with the 1988 C-Record/Delta group. Rode the bike yesterday, very bright, lively ride.

  8. daveornee said:

    A classic looking beauty.
    What is the wall thickness: center & ends?
    I love the looks and ride of Waterford!... I just can't afford one.

    Not sure of the wall thickness, thinner than standard TrueTemper tubes.

    The lugs were a surprise, I think cuz we have been doing really well with Waterford lately-Thanks Richard!!

  9. Please post some decent pictures. I just love seeing bikes with C-Record!

  10. Is that a low BB?

    How come?

  11. Peter@vecchios said:

    Comes today, pix taken before ship-too pretty for me!!

    http://waterfordbikes.com/now/modelthis.php?blobid=595&bwid=199

    953 tubes-my, they did a nice job-I'll report on how it rides. Not my first steel bicycle, but maybe my last!!

    What a beauty. I'm very jealous. Build details please?

  12. 531Aussie said:

    Is that a low BB?

    How come?

    Not any lower than any other.

  13. Powerful Pete said:

    Please post some decent pictures. I just love seeing bikes with C-Record!

    Not sure how???

  14. PeterF said:

    What a beauty. I'm very jealous. Build details please?

    1 inch threaded fork, Henry James stainless crown and stainless legs. Late 80s C-Record/Delta group. Mavic Mach II CDs, tubulars, Conti Sprinters. Grammo stem. TTT Merckx bend handlebars.

  15. Peter@vecchios said:

    Not any lower than any other.

    I thought 'standard' was 68 to 70mm -- not that 5mm will make much difference, I guess

  16. 531Aussie said:

    Is that a low BB?


    70 mm drop is most common on stock frames these days, but that extra half-centimeter was common for most steel road (not criterium) frames.

  17. Peter! We are still waiting for pictures of your bike mounted with Campagnolo Corsa Record (the sexiest group ever produced!).

    Thanks!

  18. Peter, I am just a little jealous now. If you post more pictures of this beautiful bike, I'll be insanely jealous! I may have to sell my truck and buy one:p .

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.